28.12.2012 Views

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10 <strong>Frontline</strong> <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong><br />

high alert and in forward positions. <strong>The</strong> Indian leaders wanted to see<br />

whether Musharraf’s pledge was translated into practice. <strong>The</strong>y refused<br />

to resume negotiations and normalize relations with <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong> until all<br />

their conditions were met, including their extradition demands.<br />

Musharraf’s 12 January speech drew domestic as well international,<br />

support. But the measures taken by his government were insufficient<br />

against the activities of the jihadist groups. <strong>The</strong> ban was not applied to<br />

<strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>i-controlled Kashmir, or the semi-autonomous tribal areas bordering<br />

Afghanistan, which enabled militant organizations to shift their<br />

infrastructure and cadres to these regions. Hundreds of <strong>Islam</strong>ic militants,<br />

returning from Afghanistan after the collapse of the Taliban regime in<br />

December 2001, had moved to the <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>i part of Kashmir and were<br />

ready to join the armed struggle on the other side of the border. Most of<br />

these militants belonged to the three outlawed <strong>Islam</strong>ic groups.<br />

It became apparent that, while promising to curb <strong>Islam</strong>ic extremism<br />

and sectarianism, Musharraf was still not willing to completely delink<br />

<strong>Islam</strong>abad’s connection with the Kashmiri militants. Meanwhile,<br />

India’s refusal to pull back troops from advance positions and resume<br />

negotiations with <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong> also tied his hands. Cross-border infiltration<br />

of militants into Indian-controlled Kashmir slowed down, but never<br />

completely stopped. Most of the militants detained following the 12<br />

January declaration, were released. On 20 March 2002, the CIA chief,<br />

George Tenet, told the United States Senate Armed Services Committee<br />

that the chances of war in the region were the highest since 1971.<br />

In the midst of the military stand-off with India, Musharraf decided<br />

to hold a referendum to extend his term in the office of President. In<br />

his address to the nation in March 2001, Musharraf declared his intent<br />

to enter politics and stay at the helm, a far cry from the ‘reluctant coupmaker’<br />

of October 1999. <strong>With</strong> a feeling of déjà vu in the air, Musharraf<br />

announced that he was seeking public approval for an extension of<br />

his tenure in office, for an additional five years beyond the three-yearperiod<br />

stipulated by the Supreme Court. 15 <strong>The</strong> General also announced<br />

plans to introduce a new political formula, which he claimed was in<br />

conformity with the country’s requirement for progress and stability.<br />

He declared that the military would continue to play a dominant role in<br />

the new political system, which was to emerge after the parliamentary<br />

elections scheduled for October 2002. Predictably, Musharraf received<br />

more than 90 per cent of the votes in a highly rigged referendum<br />

held in April 2002. <strong>The</strong> dubious polls not only dented Musharraf’s<br />

credibility, but also sharpened the political polarization as the country

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!