28.12.2012 Views

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

Frontline Pakistan : The Struggle With Militant Islam - Arz-e-Pak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kashmir<br />

flared up again. A terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament on 13<br />

December renewed the threat of war.<br />

India quickly blamed two <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>i-based <strong>Islam</strong>ic militant groups,<br />

JeM and LeT, for the attack.This audacious raid on the symbol of Indian<br />

power brought the two newly nuclear-powered nations once again to<br />

the brink of war. India retaliated by severing diplomatic relations and<br />

cut rail and air communications and put <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong> on notice to rein<br />

in the militant groups or face the consequences of war. <strong>The</strong> gravity<br />

of the terrorist attack and the post-9/11 global security environment<br />

provided India the excuse to consider military action, to stop what<br />

it described, as cross-border terrorism. 12 Meanwhile, India demanded<br />

that <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong> hand over 20 ‘most wanted terrorists’, including Masood<br />

Azhar, Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh and five other men involved in the<br />

December 1999 hijacking of an Indian Airlines plane. <strong>The</strong> new Bush<br />

doctrine of pre-emptive strikes against the source of terrorism and the<br />

changes in the international rules of engagement afforded India the<br />

chance to engage <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong> in brinkmanship.<br />

In the third week of December, India launched ‘Operation<br />

Parakaram’ (Valour), which constituted the heaviest Indian troop<br />

mobilization since the 1971 war. It was a deliberate move by New<br />

Delhi, amidst the war on terror, to threaten <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong> with military<br />

strikes if <strong>Islam</strong>abad did not stop sponsoring cross-border terrorism.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was every indication that India would not shy away from going<br />

to war. <strong>With</strong> <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>’s counter-mobilization, nearly one million troops<br />

sat eyeball to eyeball across the India-<strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong> border. Both countries<br />

moved ballistic missiles and troops close to their shared border. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

was a considerable risk of nuclear escalation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> threat of war, coupled with US pressure, forced <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong> to<br />

take action against the <strong>Islam</strong>ic militant groups. On 12 January 2002,<br />

Musharraf banned LeT and JeM, which were blamed by India for the<br />

13 December attack. He promised not to let <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>i territory be used<br />

for cross-border terrorism. 13 Some two thousand activists of banned<br />

extremist groups were detained in a nationwide crackdown.<br />

Musharraf, however, made it very clear that the measures against<br />

the <strong>Islam</strong>ic extremist groups did not change his position on Kashmir.<br />

‘Kashmir runs in our blood. No <strong><strong>Pak</strong>istan</strong>i can afford to severe links<br />

with Kashmir. We will continue to give all diplomatic, political and<br />

moral support to the Kashmiris,’ he declared. 14<br />

India reacted positively to Musharraf’s 12 January speech and subsequent<br />

moves to curb the militants. Nevertheless, it kept its military on<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!