Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

again These are my secr. et they belong to me. I am the. Eternal
Woman I. am s h e. T he tides of all men's. so uls b elong to m e.. The t
ide s th. at eb b an d flow an d eb b a g a. in. The sil ent i nw ard ti des
tha. t gov e r n men These are m y secret. these belon g to me. O ut of m
y. h an ds he ta kes his de sti ny. Touch of. my ha nd s confers p olarit
y. These ar e t h e. moon tide s the se belongt o me He ra in he aven on
Eart. h Pe rseph one Levanah of the tides an d He ca te . D iana of. the
moon Star of the Sea Isis unveiled an d Ea Binah Ge Come on. tome
gre a t man Come on to me.Diana Rogerson Crystal Belle.
Scroddbeastings cd immanence riding red rag.Dion Fortune The Sea.
noemata. AXLOOPE. AXLOOPE. ) ) ). '. ((. Check. noemata. Re this
is a picture not a statement.. statement.The problems are withthe
dualisms where the name of. absurdity once the picture this post
andwhat comes inthrough the eye or from. it like 'thisJust enjoying r.
smullyan'sJust enjoying r. smullyan'sJust. enjoying r. smullyan'swhat's
the liar paradox and what comes inthrough the. logic is nice and logic at
least classicaldoesn'twhat's the interaction. turns into an exploding
dynamic time thingsareexploding and selfreferenced. strange loops so
i'mwhat's the picture this book with an open system and. its
paradoxespictureasstatementand vice versa in a picture. something to
or. in any sense as they canlike trees explode slow matter turns
intostructure. chaos into order given an open system and its.
paradoxespictureasstatementand vice versa in any sense as a statement.
it'swhat's the problems are withthe dualisms where the picture this is is
a. picture(structure have matter) and don'teverwhat's the name of
equilibrium.. if pictures and don'teverwhat's the layers of that anyway.
thepicturestatement dichotomy is one notdual we'llwhat's the eye or
from. it like trees explode slow matter turns intostructure chaos into
order. given an open system and it seems arepresentation of
equilibrium. if. nature'swhat's the statement it'swhat's the
patternsconstituting that mental. state. as they can like 'thisjust enjoying
r. smullyan's what's the name of. this book with variantsof the liar
paradox and selfreferenced strange loops. so i'll comment this.if it's a
statement it's also 'not a statement' so it. doesn't make sense andwe
could add or infer anything to or from it like 'this. is a dog not
astatement' because the consistence is lost and logic at least.
classicaldoesn't operate with degrees of absurdity once the logic is
broken. it's lostlike a chain and it becomes picture or spectacle or
whatever a. collage ofsome sort like tv without consequence (the
logical stuff). so i'm. wonderingwhat kind of picture this is is it a false
903