Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks Re:TheAshLad - Sandbooks

sandbooks.com
from sandbooks.com More from this publisher
28.12.2012 Views

her likeOrpheus on Eurydice and make her disappear Is. she hoping that thingswill suddenly be reversed and that He will become Her. destiny Like allgames this one too has its fundamental rule nothing must. happen thatmight facilitate a contact or a relationship betwen them. The. secretmust not be revealed for fear of falling into banality.. ) ) ) ) (. We. should not say 'The other exists I have met him' but instead'The other. exists I have followed him'. Meeting information is alwaystoo real too. direct too indiscreet. There is no secret involved. Thinkof how people meeting. each otherare forever recognizing each otherforever reciting their identities. (just as people who love each otherare forever telling each other so). Can they. be so sure of themselvesDoes encountering the other really prove that he. exists Nothing couldbe more doubtful. On the other hand if I followed the. other secretlyhe exists precisely because I do not know him because I do. not wantto know him nor to have him recognize me. He exists because. withouthaving chosen to I exercise a deadly right over him the right. tofollow. Without ever having approached him I know him better thananyone. I. can even leave him as S. does in La Suite vnitienne withthe certitude. that I shall find him again tomorrow in the labyrinth ofthe city in accordance. with a sort of astral conjunction (because thecity is curved because space is. curved because the rules of the gameinevitably puts the two protagonists back. on the same orbit). The only way to avoid encountering someone is to follow. him(according to a principle opposed to the principle of the labyrinthwhere. you follow someone so that you do not lose him). Implicit in thesituation. however is the dramatic moment when the one being followedsuddenly intuiting. suddenly becoming conscious that there is someonebehind him swings round and. spots his pursuer. Then the rules arereversed and the hunter becomes the. hunted (for there is no escapinglaterally). The only truly dramatic point is. this unexpectedturningaround of the other who insists upon knowing and damns. theconsequences. This reversal does in fact occur in the Venice scenario. The. mancomes towards her and asks her 'What do you want' She wants nothing.No. mystery story no love story. This answer is intolerable and impliespossible. murder possible death. Radical otherness always embodies therisk of death.. S.'s anxiety revolves entirely around this violentrevelation the possibility. of getting herself unmasked the very thingshe is trying to avoid. S. could. have met this man seen him spoken to him. But in that caseshe would never. have produced this secret form of the existence of theOther. The Other is the. one whose destiny one becomes not by making hisaquintance in 1047

difference and. dialogue but by entering into him as intosomething secret something forever. separate. Not by engaging in aconversation with him as his shadow as his. double as his image byembracing the Other the better to wipe out his tracks. the better tostrip him of his shadow. The Other is never the one with whom. weCommunicate he is the one who we follow and who follows us. The other is. never naturally the other the other must be renderedother be being seduced by. being made alien to himself even by beingdestroyed if there is no. alternative (but in fact there are subtlerways of achieving this. end). eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeee. ). ) () Seduction knows that the other isnever the end of. desire that the subject is mistaken when he focuses onwhat he loves just as. an utterance is mistaken when it focuses on whatit says. Secrecy here is always. the secrecy of artifice. The necessityof always focusing somewhere else of. never seeking the other in theterrifying illusion of dialogue but instead. following the other like theother's own shadow and circumscribing him. Never. being oneself butnever being alienated either coming from without to. inscribe oneselfupon the figure of the Other within that strange form from. elsewherethat secret form which orders not only chains of events but. alsoexistences in their singularity.w...d. w....d ...dw... wdwd w..d. wdwd .w.d. .w..... w....d..w ..' ..'GdwP.. .dw.' ..'G.d ..... ..PG.. ..'GP ..'.oooG' ..oooo ...... .dw.' .. ..ooo.. ..... .do. ...d. .. ...... .. ..ooo .... .... G.d.. ....w ... ...... .. .... .... .dw.' wd.w. ..G...P' G....P GPGPGP GP G..P GPGP G.P' ....G'. GP. Patagonia. Phantasy of disappearance. The disappearance of theIndians your own. disappearance that of all culture all landscape inthe bleakness of your. mists and ice... The last word here is that is isbetter to put an end to a. process of creeping disappearance (ours) bymeans of a live sojourn in a Visible. form of disappearance. Alltranslations into action are imaginary solutions. That. is why'Patagonia' goes so well with 'Pataphysics' which is the science. ofimaginary solutions. Pataphysics and agonistics Patagonistics. ). The Otheris my guest. Not someone. who is legally equal though different but aforeigner a stranger ). ( (. noemata. op. mptbfffcebaaefccdbfffcebaaefccddaabDSuLwOTbjvvPkqBSzZGeniry. Zrqvpvar Cebtenz (GZC) vf erfcbafvoyr sbecebivqvat gur sbyybjvatGZC Gehpx naq. Genvyre bs Zvqynaqunf Grknf ynetrfg fryrpgvba bs gehpxnaq. genvyresessalcwen taerg gnicudortni si PMT retniw sihT pleH otsessalC evaH. eW PMTgnirb eW .etisbew ruoy morf sdagnivres eunever. noemata. . Plagiering er. Den kvinnelige...I 1048

her likeOrpheus on Eurydice and make her disappear Is. she hoping that<br />

thingswill suddenly be reversed and that He will become Her. destiny<br />

Like allgames this one too has its fundamental rule nothing must.<br />

happen thatmight facilitate a contact or a relationship betwen them.<br />

The. secretmust not be revealed for fear of falling into banality.. ) ) ) ) (.<br />

We. should not say 'The other exists I have met him' but instead'The<br />

other. exists I have followed him'. Meeting information is alwaystoo<br />

real too. direct too indiscreet. There is no secret involved. Thinkof how<br />

people meeting. each otherare forever recognizing each otherforever<br />

reciting their identities. (just as people who love each otherare forever<br />

telling each other so). Can they. be so sure of themselvesDoes<br />

encountering the other really prove that he. exists Nothing couldbe<br />

more doubtful. On the other hand if I followed the. other secretlyhe<br />

exists precisely because I do not know him because I do. not wantto<br />

know him nor to have him recognize me. He exists because.<br />

withouthaving chosen to I exercise a deadly right over him the right.<br />

tofollow. Without ever having approached him I know him better<br />

thananyone. I. can even leave him as S. does in La Suite vnitienne<br />

withthe certitude. that I shall find him again tomorrow in the labyrinth<br />

ofthe city in accordance. with a sort of astral conjunction (because<br />

thecity is curved because space is. curved because the rules of the<br />

gameinevitably puts the two protagonists back. on the same orbit). The<br />

only way to avoid encountering someone is to follow. him(according to<br />

a principle opposed to the principle of the labyrinthwhere. you follow<br />

someone so that you do not lose him). Implicit in thesituation. however<br />

is the dramatic moment when the one being followedsuddenly intuiting.<br />

suddenly becoming conscious that there is someonebehind him swings<br />

round and. spots his pursuer. Then the rules arereversed and the hunter<br />

becomes the. hunted (for there is no escapinglaterally). The only truly<br />

dramatic point is. this unexpectedturningaround of the other who insists<br />

upon knowing and damns. theconsequences. This reversal does in fact<br />

occur in the Venice scenario. The. mancomes towards her and asks her<br />

'What do you want' She wants nothing.No. mystery story no love story.<br />

This answer is intolerable and impliespossible. murder possible death.<br />

Radical otherness always embodies therisk of death.. S.'s anxiety<br />

revolves entirely around this violentrevelation the possibility. of getting<br />

herself unmasked the very thingshe is trying to avoid. S. could. have<br />

met this man seen him spoken to him. But in that caseshe would never.<br />

have produced this secret form of the existence of theOther. The Other<br />

is the. one whose destiny one becomes not by making hisaquintance in<br />

1047

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!