blocked_10_final
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
REVIEW OF<br />
By Uknitted Kingdom<br />
‘Number knitting, The new all-ways-stretch method’<br />
22<br />
I’m a self-confessed “process knitter.”<br />
The techniques and intricacies of knitting<br />
and crochet hold far more interest<br />
for me than a finished object. It is why I<br />
have dozens of works in progress (WIPs)<br />
and why, once I understand a new technique<br />
used in a pattern, I often lose interest<br />
in continuing. If the project is a<br />
large sweater, or a blanket, it sometimes<br />
morphs into a symbol of shame, a reminder<br />
of my failure to see the job<br />
through to the end.<br />
The phrase “A Jack of all trades is a<br />
master of none, but oftentimes better<br />
than a master of one,” definitely explains<br />
those of us with magpie-brains coveting<br />
knowledge and collecting<br />
techniques. Ooo, there’s a shiny<br />
new skill I need to learn. Be right<br />
back…<br />
I hold an envious respect for<br />
those who are more single-minded<br />
and can apply their skills to one<br />
project for years, decades, or even a<br />
lifetime.<br />
In the knitting and crochet world<br />
there are many YouTubers committed<br />
to long-term projects, such<br />
as:<br />
● Roxanne Richardson knitting a<br />
sweater from every decade from<br />
1890.<br />
● Engineering Knits knitting and<br />
crocheting from Weldons’ Practical<br />
Needlework series<br />
● Vintage Crochet following the<br />
original (often vague and confusing)<br />
instructions for a Victorian pattern<br />
before revealing what it should have<br />
looked like.<br />
● Nathan Taylor, The Sockmatician,<br />
who has worked tirelessly on<br />
his double brioche and triple-knit<br />
projects.<br />
When I heard about Kelly Vaughn<br />
(Knitswag on social media) and her<br />
long-erm project to re-publish Virginia<br />
Woods Bellamy’s “Number<br />
knitting, The new all-ways-stretch<br />
method” (1952), I was fixated for several<br />
reasons:<br />
● Despite the difficulty I have sticking<br />
with a project, the one pattern I return<br />
to again and again is the mitered<br />
square. Each square holds my attention<br />
from beginning to end and both of my<br />
favorite techniques are used throughout<br />
(central double decrease (CDD) and<br />
picking up and knitting stitches (PUK)).<br />
Virginia’s book holds the original mitresquare<br />
method. Although she never<br />
refers to the squares as ‘mitres’, nor<br />
does she use CDDs, there’s no mistaking<br />
them for anything else.<br />
● The book is hard to find and incredibly<br />
expensive. Only 5,000 copies<br />
were printed in 1952 and they have<br />
since become collector’s items; sometimes<br />
eliciting prices of over $500 for a<br />
hardcover original. Even the electronic<br />
version is expensive. There are two<br />
electronic versions ($74.99 and $39.99<br />
– more on this to follow). What becomes<br />
rare becomes wanted.<br />
● After reading the 1972 reprint<br />
editions of Mary Thomas’ Knitting Book<br />
(1938), and Mary Thomas’ Book of Knitting<br />
Patterns (1943), I have been far<br />
more interested in the knitting of the<br />
past than the knitting of the present.<br />
Virginia’s book hits the sweet spot of<br />
time between Mary Thomas, James<br />
Norbury, and Elizabeth Zimmermann.<br />
● Although 70+ years since publication,<br />
Virginia’s approach, techniques,<br />
and knowledge appear refreshingly<br />
new. I think I can say with confidence<br />
that you will never before have encountered<br />
patterns written and<br />
presented/charted the way Virginia<br />
does in “Number Knitting.” There is so<br />
much to learn from this book and yet, at<br />
first glance, one might be forgiven for<br />
missing its secrets. It’s old, yet new,<br />
dated, yet exciting, and Kelly Vaughn is<br />
unlocking the dust-covered jewellery<br />
box and sharing the diamonds.<br />
I can imagine at this point you might<br />
Continued on next page...