28.12.2012 Views

33 Special Types of Invasive Breast Carcinoma: Diagnostic Criteria ...

33 Special Types of Invasive Breast Carcinoma: Diagnostic Criteria ...

33 Special Types of Invasive Breast Carcinoma: Diagnostic Criteria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

carcinoma should be restricted to those tumors containing large amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

extracellular mucin (1). “Large amounts” <strong>of</strong> extracellular mucus has been arbitrarily<br />

defined as more than 1/3rd <strong>of</strong> the tumor volume made up <strong>of</strong> extracellular mucin (2-4).<br />

Some have insisted on a 50% or more mucinous growth pattern before the diagnosis<br />

<strong>of</strong> mucinous breast carcinoma can be made; others require that at least 75% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tumor have the distinctive mucinous pattern (3,5). I find these arbitrary percentages<br />

difficult to apply and even unrealistic. Do these definitions include the in situ<br />

component, which may be prominent and sometimes difficult to separate from the<br />

earliest phases <strong>of</strong> stromal invasion? Should we apply automated image analysis<br />

routinely? How many tumor sections should we examine? I insist on a pure pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

classical invasive mucinous carcinoma before making the diagnosis.<br />

Examples composed in part <strong>of</strong> areas more c/w InvDC,NOS are best diagnosed as<br />

“mixed ductal (NOS) and mucinous carcinoma” or “invasive ductal carcinoma (NOS)<br />

with marked mucinous differentiation,” and I histologically grade the tumor using<br />

either a mBR or SBR grading scheme. The admixture <strong>of</strong> InvDC,NOS with classical<br />

mucinous carcinoma worsens the prognosis and requires the designation “mixed<br />

ductal (NOS) and mucinous carcinoma.” “InvDC,NOS with marked mucinous<br />

differentiation” features marked extracellular mucin deposition, but nowhere in the<br />

invasive tumor does the volume <strong>of</strong> mucin comprise more than 1/3rd <strong>of</strong> the tumor<br />

volume. It, too, has a worse prognosis than pure mucinous carcinoma.<br />

Pure mucinous carcinoma has been shown to have a favorable prognosis in many<br />

studies (6-11). Pure mucinous carcinomas tend to be smaller than tumors that have<br />

mixed mucinous and ductal patterns, and patients with these tumors have a lower<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> axillary lymph node metastases (2,3,6,8,9,12). Negative axillary lymph<br />

nodes in patients with pure mucinous carcinoma range from 71% to 97% compared to<br />

50% for patients with mixed mucinous carcinomas. Positive lymph nodes have been<br />

reported in pure mucinous carcinoma especially in cases with micropapillary pattern<br />

and in younger age (39). Therefore, sentinal lymph node biopsy and staging is<br />

recommended even for pure varaints (39).<br />

Five-year disease-free survivals, after the treatment <strong>of</strong> pure mucinous carcinoma by<br />

mastectomy, are from 84-100% (3,6,8). Patients with mixed mucinous and ductal<br />

histologies do more poorly. Komaki et al. (12) reported a 90% 10-year overall<br />

survival for pure mucinous carcinoma versus 60% for those with mixed<br />

ductal/mucinous carcinoma. Toikkanen et al. (9) reported that the 15-year disease-free<br />

survival was 85% and 63% for pure mucinous and mixed mucinous/ductal carcinoma<br />

patients, respectively. Nonetheless, late systemic recurrences can occur with pure<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!