28.12.2012 Views

33 Special Types of Invasive Breast Carcinoma: Diagnostic Criteria ...

33 Special Types of Invasive Breast Carcinoma: Diagnostic Criteria ...

33 Special Types of Invasive Breast Carcinoma: Diagnostic Criteria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

study <strong>of</strong> 2658 cases <strong>of</strong> primary invasive breast carcinoma patients, when histologic<br />

grade, lymph node status, and tumor size were considered, histologic grade was the<br />

most important independent factor in predicting survival. Yet, when histologic type<br />

was also considered in the multivariate analysis, it was found to be independently<br />

significant, although comparatively <strong>of</strong> less importance than histologic grade.<br />

Furthermore, histologic grading is important, because disagreements continue to occur<br />

between pathologists as to the subclassification <strong>of</strong> breast carcinoma. This happens<br />

because criteria remain controversial (especially in diagnosing medullary carcinoma<br />

and making distinctions between infiltrating lobular and duct carcinomas), and clearly<br />

mixed and/or intermediate patterns <strong>of</strong> breast carcinoma occur that can be difficult to<br />

classify. Also, some clinicians appear to more easily accept a histologic grade<br />

designation than a vaguely understood and sometimes controversial subtype<br />

designation. Thus, it is wise to give all invasive breast carcinomas a histologic grade,<br />

including the special types like lobular, mucinous, secretory, adenoid cystic,<br />

tubular/cribriform carcinomas, etc. Often, as noted above, these types receive well<br />

differentiated or mBR grade 1 designation, an expected result given their less<br />

aggressive behavior. An exception is medullary carcinoma, for which controversy<br />

continues regarding diagnostic criteria and prognosis. Medullary carcinoma is almost<br />

always mBR grade 3. In contrast to other studies, Elston et al. (5,6,8) were unable to<br />

show an improved outcome for patients with medullary breast carcinoma, even when<br />

strict morphologic criteria were imposed. I believe medullary carcinoma can be over<br />

diagnosed, and it is a diagnosis difficult to reproduce between competent pathologists<br />

(9). The diagnosis <strong>of</strong> medullary carcinoma has become uncommon in our practice.<br />

Histologic grade (especially when using standardized criteria such as the Bloom-<br />

Richardson criteria [10-16]) helps place any invasive breast carcinoma into its proper<br />

prognostic and therapeutic category, especially when there is controversy or confusion<br />

about the proper subtype designation.<br />

-5-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!