19.09.2023 Views

Hotel SA September 2023

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

W O R K P L A C E R E L A T I O N S<br />

example under the Food and beverage stream a<br />

Food and beverage attendant grade 2 (wage level 2)<br />

classification is defined as an employee:<br />

“… who has not achieved the appropriate level of training<br />

and who is engaged in any of the following:<br />

• Supplying, dispensing and mixing liquor, including<br />

selling liquor from the bottle department;<br />

• Assisting in the cellar or bottle department<br />

• Undertaking general waiting duties for food and<br />

beverages or both, including cleaning tables;<br />

• Receiving money;<br />

• Attending a snack bar;<br />

• Performing delivery duties; and<br />

• Taking reservations, greeting and seating guests.”<br />

Once the classification wage level in Schedule A has<br />

been determined we can then ascertain the minimum<br />

hourly rate (excluding loadings) for the employee by<br />

cross checking the classification wage level with the<br />

corresponding wage level contained in Clause 18 of the<br />

HIGA – Minimum Rates.<br />

APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF TRAINING & TRADE<br />

QUALIFICATIONS<br />

A number of classification definitions in Schedule A<br />

make reference to the term appropriate level of training.<br />

There are several instances where an employee will be<br />

classified at a higher classification level in the respective<br />

stream where they have achieved the appropriate level<br />

of training.<br />

Appropriate level of training under the HIGA is defined<br />

under Clause 2 as an employee who:<br />

“(a) has completed an appropriate training program that<br />

meets the training and assessment requirements of<br />

a qualification or one or more appropriate units of<br />

competency forming part of a training package; or<br />

(b) has been assessed by a qualified skills assessor as<br />

having skills at least equivalent to those attained in<br />

an appropriate training program; or<br />

(c) as at 30 June 2010, has been doing the work of<br />

a particular classification for a period of at least<br />

3 months.”<br />

Those who are recruiting and subsequently classifying<br />

employees for roles need to ensure that when<br />

onboarding employees they obtain records of any<br />

relevant training that the new employee may have<br />

previously undertaken (e.g. Certificate II, III or higher in<br />

hospitality or cookery).<br />

The HIGA in Schedule A also makes references to<br />

grades that contain a tradesperson classification.<br />

For example the cooking stream refers to Cook<br />

Grade 3 (tradesperson) (wage level 4), Cook Grade<br />

4 (tradesperson) (wage level 5), and Cook Grade 5<br />

(tradesperson) (wage level 6).<br />

Where the classification level refers to tradesperson,<br />

the employee will need to be able to produce to the<br />

employer relevant trade qualifications as proof of<br />

evidence that they are trade qualified in order to be<br />

classified within that tradesperson classification level.<br />

NATIONAL STRUCTURE<br />

The HIGA is a national modern award which contains<br />

a classification structure under Schedule A which is<br />

applicable to employers and employees across Australia<br />

in the hospitality industry.<br />

The classification structure is a national structure and<br />

therefore does not contain references to any state or<br />

territory based legislation. We often get enquiries at<br />

the AHA|<strong>SA</strong> about whether an employee’s approval<br />

as a gaming employee or manager under the Gaming<br />

Machines Act 1992 (<strong>SA</strong>) or responsible person approval<br />

under the Liquor Licensing Act 1997 (<strong>SA</strong>) affects the<br />

level that the employee should be classified under. As<br />

there is no reference to these South Australian Acts,<br />

the HIGA does not make any distinction between<br />

classification levels based on whether an employee is<br />

approved as a gaming manager, gaming employee or<br />

responsible person.<br />

Ultimately the employee’s classification is defined<br />

according to the definition outlined within the<br />

classification level. For example one of the duties<br />

outlined under the Food and Beverage attendant grade<br />

3 (wage level 3) classification level is “attending a<br />

wagering terminal, electronic gaming terminal or similar<br />

terminal”. This is the only reference to gaming (outside<br />

of casinos) under the HIGA, there is no distinction as to<br />

whether someone is approved as a gaming employee or<br />

gaming manager under the Gaming Machines Act 1992<br />

(<strong>SA</strong>).<br />

MANAGERIAL CLASSIFICATION<br />

The HIGA provides a classification level under Schedule<br />

A.2.9 for managerial staff. There are parameters around<br />

which roles can be classified under the managerial<br />

classification.<br />

Firstly for a role to be considered under the managerial<br />

staff classification the employee needs to be employed<br />

in a hotel. A hotel is defined under Schedule A.2.9 as:<br />

“hotels, resorts, casinos, taverns, wine saloons, wine and<br />

spirit merchants retailing to the general public and other<br />

retail licensed establishments in or in connection with<br />

accommodation, with the selling of drinks, preparing and<br />

servicing food and drinks, cleaning and attending to the<br />

premises and all other associated services. “<br />

Having determined that the establishment is a hotel, we<br />

then need to look at the employees’ duties and level of<br />

Back to Contents www.ahasa.asn.au | <strong>Hotel</strong> <strong>SA</strong> | 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!