15.08.2023 Views

[Blake_Stimson,_Gregory_Sholette]_Collectivism_aft(z-lib

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

After the “Descent to the Everyday” 59

go to Senkon for their preplanning of the trial as a performance work—most

typically for the Wrst day of the trial in 1966, which is now commonly known

as Exhibition Event at the Courtroom (Figure 2.3); and it continued to actively

appropriate the courtroom as its own discursive space. Also notable was the

involvement of the law-enforcement authorities, who became unwitting collaborators

of Akasegawa in bringing his money work out to a wider space of

society. This participation of “nonartists” was inadvertent, to be sure. Yet

this form of “inadvertent collectivism,” so to speak, could expand the scope

of a work—particularly when the work was staged in public space—making

innocent bystanders an integral part of the work. In the case of Akasegawa’s

incident, without the police and the prosecutors’ inadvertent collaboration,

there would have been no Model 1,000-Yen Note Incident, which made HRC

the best-documented Japanese collective of the 1960s.

After the regional court rendered the guilty verdict in 1967,

Akasegawa went on to turn “inadvertent collectivism” into “participatory

collectivism,” expanding the role of nonartists in his work. By exploiting

the print media, he invented a few scenarios to create a loose community of

“willing” participants. In his Greater Japan Zero-Yen Note (1967), many helped

him avenge himself against the state that put him through a legal ordeal by

replacing real money with his new money of no value. 35 In his graphic project

The Sakura Illustrated (1970–71), he conceived a mail-in program to recruit

for his Sakura (“Cherry”) Volunteer Army, which boasted a membership

of over two hundred. 36 In 1972, he devised an ongoing project, Ultra-Art

Tomason, for which participants sent him photographs of nameless works of

“ultra-art” they found in everyday life. 37

Group “I” and Anonymity

The end of the “Yomiuri Independent” triggered a few artist-organized independent

exhibitions. Notable among them was the eleven-day-long “Gifu

Independent Art Festival,” held in August 1965 in Gifu. In this mountainous

town in central Japan known for cormorant Wshing, the organizer Vava,

a local collective active since 1958, 38 extended Gutai’s legacy of outdoor

exhibition by selecting the venues at a riverbank, a park, and a gymnasium.

A total of some one hundred individuals and nine collectives gathered,

including such regional groups as Okayama Young Artists Group, Saitama

Avant-Garde Artists Group, Jack’s Society, Zero Dimension, Nomo Group,

Gaga Contemporary Art, and Group “I.” Although most of the outdoor works

tended to be drowned out in a vast natural setting, Group “I”—which consisted

of nine Kobe residents, including Kawaguchi Tatsuo—drew most attention

with its Hole on the bank of the Nagara River. Silently toiling under

the scorching sun for the duration of the festival, they dug a hole ten meters

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!