[Blake_Stimson,_Gregory_Sholette]_Collectivism_aft(z-lib

dragan.tabakovic
from dragan.tabakovic More from this publisher
15.08.2023 Views

Internationaleries 29of the fourth and Wnal group discussed in this chapter, the Situationist International.The SI reached its peak in the sixties, but continued on into theearly 1970s. More theoretically poised than the LI, the SI was also more orientatedtoward radical politics. Their substantial work in cinema, graphics,theory, and publishing is today highly inXuential and increasingly studied. 50Certainly from the perspective of the grotesque the group’s détourned moviesare exemplary. Seeking to undermine the usual mimetic experience of viewingcinema they destroyed the mirror-like, imaginary identiWcation viewerstypically have with the Wlmic image. However, it was the SI members’ manyexperiments in publishing that most clearly express their approach to collectivepractice. Collaborative works such as Fin de Copenhague in whichAsger Jorn and Guy Debord exchange artistic ideas are what we would calltoday “artist’s books.” Self-published in a limited edition, Fin de Copenhagueconsisted of two hundred printed copies and bore the unmistaken imprintof a rough, samizdat publication including irregularly Wnished pages, unevencoloration, and assorted other imperfections typical of non-mass-producedobjects. Even its title acknowledged a grotesque experiment by invokingthe idea of “ends” as well as “means” and further mocking the bureaucraticmystiWcation of everyday life. In addition, just as in their Wlms, Fin de Copenhaguewas a pilfered assemblage of cut-out materials appropriated from Danishnewspapers, French advertising commercials, city maps, comic pages,and various stolen sentences pulled out of their original context includingespecially various political slogans of the day. SigniWcantly, in keeping withother aspects of their practice, the book was also freely distributed.As has been widely acknowledged, the most important “grotescoserious”experimental tool of the SI was without doubt their journal, theInternationale Situationniste. The journal’s twelve issues between 1958 and1969 were “luxuriously produced,” and not without ample reference toavant-garde and constructivist aesthetics. However, instead of the primarycolors associated with Kalte Kunst, the journal displayed glowing metalliccovers in blue and pink, gold and silver, thus ironically framing the “newmachine age.” The magazine’s initial layout also included photographs ofthe members with misplaced captions and judiciously peppered photographsof pinups girls in raincoats standing either on beaches or resting supine onthe backs of horses. This visual diffusion functioned as an obvious parody ofPlayboy magazine, which had recently been launched in 1953. It mockedthe new magazine’s thinly veiled treatment of sexual desire as a product ofpolitical economy. 51 Inside, its pages contained detailed diagrams of moderncities, assorted maps of an unknown, dystopic suburbia, as well as a linedrawing of an apparatus for generating a “Gaussian distribution” of driftingpaths. 52

30 Jelena StojanovićIn the 1960s the “détourned” comics of Andre Bertrand wereadded to the SI journal. Refusing to hold copyright, Bertrand’s graphicsridiculed the ambiguous pop-art strategies of American artists. However,the largest inXuence the SI had came from their pamphlets including RaoulVaneigem’s 1966 brochure, On the Poverty of Student Life, or The Situationistsand the New Forms of Action in Politics and Art. These were widely translatedaround the world and in many cases directly contributed to the core of studentupheavals in the mid- to late 1960s. 53 But most inXuential of all wasFIGURE 1.4. Fin de Copenhague, a MIBI détournement by Asger Jorn andGuy Debord, 1957. GrafWti reads “Long live free Algeria.” Copyright 2004 fam.Jorn/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York/COPY-DAN, Copenhagen.

Internationaleries 29

of the fourth and Wnal group discussed in this chapter, the Situationist International.

The SI reached its peak in the sixties, but continued on into the

early 1970s. More theoretically poised than the LI, the SI was also more orientated

toward radical politics. Their substantial work in cinema, graphics,

theory, and publishing is today highly inXuential and increasingly studied. 50

Certainly from the perspective of the grotesque the group’s détourned movies

are exemplary. Seeking to undermine the usual mimetic experience of viewing

cinema they destroyed the mirror-like, imaginary identiWcation viewers

typically have with the Wlmic image. However, it was the SI members’ many

experiments in publishing that most clearly express their approach to collective

practice. Collaborative works such as Fin de Copenhague in which

Asger Jorn and Guy Debord exchange artistic ideas are what we would call

today “artist’s books.” Self-published in a limited edition, Fin de Copenhague

consisted of two hundred printed copies and bore the unmistaken imprint

of a rough, samizdat publication including irregularly Wnished pages, uneven

coloration, and assorted other imperfections typical of non-mass-produced

objects. Even its title acknowledged a grotesque experiment by invoking

the idea of “ends” as well as “means” and further mocking the bureaucratic

mystiWcation of everyday life. In addition, just as in their Wlms, Fin de Copenhague

was a pilfered assemblage of cut-out materials appropriated from Danish

newspapers, French advertising commercials, city maps, comic pages,

and various stolen sentences pulled out of their original context including

especially various political slogans of the day. SigniWcantly, in keeping with

other aspects of their practice, the book was also freely distributed.

As has been widely acknowledged, the most important “grotescoserious”

experimental tool of the SI was without doubt their journal, the

Internationale Situationniste. The journal’s twelve issues between 1958 and

1969 were “luxuriously produced,” and not without ample reference to

avant-garde and constructivist aesthetics. However, instead of the primary

colors associated with Kalte Kunst, the journal displayed glowing metallic

covers in blue and pink, gold and silver, thus ironically framing the “new

machine age.” The magazine’s initial layout also included photographs of

the members with misplaced captions and judiciously peppered photographs

of pinups girls in raincoats standing either on beaches or resting supine on

the backs of horses. This visual diffusion functioned as an obvious parody of

Playboy magazine, which had recently been launched in 1953. It mocked

the new magazine’s thinly veiled treatment of sexual desire as a product of

political economy. 51 Inside, its pages contained detailed diagrams of modern

cities, assorted maps of an unknown, dystopic suburbia, as well as a line

drawing of an apparatus for generating a “Gaussian distribution” of drifting

paths. 52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!