[Blake_Stimson,_Gregory_Sholette]_Collectivism_aft(z-lib
Artists’ Collectives Mostly in New York 2111993 curator Mary Jane Jacob put together a show in Chicago called “Culturein Action” that came to deWne this mode of work for municipal culturalagencies and museums. 42In 1989, several former members of the PAD/D Not For Sale groupformed REPOhistory, 43 a public art collective speciWcally concerned with theartistic recovery of lost pasts. Their Wrst sign project, marking sites of pastconXicts in lower Manhattan like the location of old New York’s slave auctions,were important in helping turn public historical representations towarda reXection of this nation’s often uncomforting past.FIGURE 7.10. REPOhistory members Ed Eisenberg and Tom Klem (on ladder) installing acounterhistorical street marker on a lamppost near Wall Street, New York, 1992. Photograph courtesyof Gregory Sholette.
212 Alan W. MooreEven as critical and community-based modes of work were reshapingconceptions of public art, discourse sharpened among political philosophersaround erosion of the public sphere in contemporary society and theconcomitant privatization of public urban spaces. Thinkers like Jürgen Habermas44 observed that the mass media had created a simulated public spherebased solely on the manipulation of consumer desire. In response, GroupMaterial sought to represent a kind of ideal public sphere in a project calledDemocracy produced at the Dia Foundation space in Soho, New York.The complex event was produced between 1988 and 1989 engagingfour issues: education, electoral politics, cultural participation, and AIDS.The work at Dia began with a roundtable of experts convened to frame theissue under consideration. Then Group Material mounted a multimedia exhibitionthat functioned as a center for meeting and discourse. Then a townmeeting was held, where disparate voices could be heard on the issues. Finally,the results were published in a book. 45 In recalling this project, Doug Ashforddescribed it as “a centering device for other kinds of cultural and socialwork.” The format of using exhibitions as forums, he believes, was one ofGroup Material’s principal achievements. 46 The Democracy meetings andexhibits also substantiated the discursive method of Group Material’s work.What David Deitcher called the “friction” of diverse elements in a GroupMaterial installation that “sparks insights into a given theme” 47 was enlargedand generalized into a process in the two-year long project at Dia (1987–89)and the 1990 book. 48 Dia’s commitment to this type of work continued witha second project produced by Martha Rosler around the issue of homelessness.“If You Lived Here” included the work of a number of artists’ groups:PAD/D, Bullet Space, Mad Housers, and work on issues around the UnitedStates/Mexico by the Border Arts Workshop.The projects of Group Material and the artists commissioned tomake public art were supported and administered by foundations and culturalinstitutions. At the same time, numerous groups were active on theradical margins of the New York art world. Among these were the squattersof the Lower East Side. 49 With its intimate link to the necessity of housing,squatted buildings are collective laboratories, and sometimes artistic ones.New York squatters were involved in the Dia exhibitions, but their primaryreality was the day-to-day pressure by the city police to evict them. Successfulcollectivity was a cherished revelation of “people power,” but triumphs,like the building seized as a community center, were short-lived. Banner artfor demonstrations and political grafWti were important propaganda tools forthe squatters. “Housed” artists forged links with organizers among the homeless,and squats opened galleries as cultural centers of resistance. These venueshelped to soften the image of squatters who were constantly portrayed
- Page 180 and 181: Performing Revolution 161structures
- Page 182 and 183: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 184 and 185: 6. The Mexican Pentagon: Adventures
- Page 186 and 187: The Mexican Pentagon 167grupos (the
- Page 188 and 189: The Mexican Pentagon 169It was agai
- Page 190 and 191: The Mexican Pentagon 171Bellas Arte
- Page 192 and 193: The Mexican Pentagon 1735 million i
- Page 194 and 195: The Mexican Pentagon 175Wlled it wi
- Page 196 and 197: The Mexican Pentagon 177Ehrenberg a
- Page 198 and 199: The Mexican Pentagon 179of a campai
- Page 200 and 201: The Mexican Pentagon 181(including
- Page 202 and 203: The Mexican Pentagon 183contributed
- Page 204 and 205: The Mexican Pentagon 185criticisms,
- Page 206 and 207: The Mexican Pentagon 187material fo
- Page 208 and 209: The Mexican Pentagon 18911. The gro
- Page 210 and 211: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 212 and 213: 7. Artists’ Collectives: Focus on
- Page 214 and 215: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 216 and 217: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 218 and 219: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 220 and 221: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 222 and 223: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 224 and 225: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 226 and 227: FIGURE 7.7. Doug Ashford of Group M
- Page 228 and 229: FIGURE 7.9. General Idea, Baby Make
- Page 232 and 233: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 234 and 235: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 236 and 237: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 238 and 239: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 240 and 241: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 242 and 243: 8. The Production of Social Space a
- Page 244 and 245: The Production of Social Space as A
- Page 246 and 247: The Production of Social Space as A
- Page 248 and 249: The Production of Social Space as A
- Page 250 and 251: The Production of Social Space as A
- Page 252 and 253: The Production of Social Space as A
- Page 254 and 255: The Production of Social Space as A
- Page 256 and 257: FIGURE 8.3. Le Groupe Amos, Peuple
- Page 258 and 259: The Production of Social Space as A
- Page 260 and 261: The Production of Social Space as A
- Page 262 and 263: The Production of Social Space as A
- Page 264 and 265: The Production of Social Space as A
- Page 266 and 267: The Production of Social Space as A
- Page 268 and 269: The Production of Social Space as A
- Page 270 and 271: The Production of Social Space as A
- Page 272 and 273: 9. Beyond Representation andAfWliat
- Page 274 and 275: Beyond Representation and AfWliatio
- Page 276 and 277: Beyond Representation and AfWliatio
- Page 278 and 279: Beyond Representation and AfWliatio
212 Alan W. Moore
Even as critical and community-based modes of work were reshaping
conceptions of public art, discourse sharpened among political philosophers
around erosion of the public sphere in contemporary society and the
concomitant privatization of public urban spaces. Thinkers like Jürgen Habermas
44 observed that the mass media had created a simulated public sphere
based solely on the manipulation of consumer desire. In response, Group
Material sought to represent a kind of ideal public sphere in a project called
Democracy produced at the Dia Foundation space in Soho, New York.
The complex event was produced between 1988 and 1989 engaging
four issues: education, electoral politics, cultural participation, and AIDS.
The work at Dia began with a roundtable of experts convened to frame the
issue under consideration. Then Group Material mounted a multimedia exhibition
that functioned as a center for meeting and discourse. Then a town
meeting was held, where disparate voices could be heard on the issues. Finally,
the results were published in a book. 45 In recalling this project, Doug Ashford
described it as “a centering device for other kinds of cultural and social
work.” The format of using exhibitions as forums, he believes, was one of
Group Material’s principal achievements. 46 The Democracy meetings and
exhibits also substantiated the discursive method of Group Material’s work.
What David Deitcher called the “friction” of diverse elements in a Group
Material installation that “sparks insights into a given theme” 47 was enlarged
and generalized into a process in the two-year long project at Dia (1987–89)
and the 1990 book. 48 Dia’s commitment to this type of work continued with
a second project produced by Martha Rosler around the issue of homelessness.
“If You Lived Here” included the work of a number of artists’ groups:
PAD/D, Bullet Space, Mad Housers, and work on issues around the United
States/Mexico by the Border Arts Workshop.
The projects of Group Material and the artists commissioned to
make public art were supported and administered by foundations and cultural
institutions. At the same time, numerous groups were active on the
radical margins of the New York art world. Among these were the squatters
of the Lower East Side. 49 With its intimate link to the necessity of housing,
squatted buildings are collective laboratories, and sometimes artistic ones.
New York squatters were involved in the Dia exhibitions, but their primary
reality was the day-to-day pressure by the city police to evict them. Successful
collectivity was a cherished revelation of “people power,” but triumphs,
like the building seized as a community center, were short-lived. Banner art
for demonstrations and political grafWti were important propaganda tools for
the squatters. “Housed” artists forged links with organizers among the homeless,
and squats opened galleries as cultural centers of resistance. These venues
helped to soften the image of squatters who were constantly portrayed