[Blake_Stimson,_Gregory_Sholette]_Collectivism_aft(z-lib
The Mexican Pentagon 169It was against this background of repression and violence that thegroups made their appearance in the 1970s. They shared an interest in communicatingwith people on the streets and exposing the criminal actionsof the Mexican regime. Out of all the groups, Proceso Pentágono was thelongest-lived, and the one that managed to articulate the most coherentartistic and political program. I would like to devote the rest of this chapterto analyzing three projects that demonstrate this group’s working methodsand political concerns: a 1973 street action, the group’s project for the 1977Paris Biennale, and a 1980 book publication.PROCESO PENTÁGONOProceso Pentágono was founded in 1973, the year of the military coup inChile, by Felipe Ehrenberg, Carlos Finck, José Antonio Hernández, and VíctorMuñoz (Figure 6.2). Initially, the group was formed to search for alternativesto the government-run museums and galleries in Mexico City—locales that Proceso Pentágono denounced as complicit, however indirectly,FIGURE 6.2. Proceso Pentágono, 1977. Left to right, Víctor Muñoz, Carlos Finck, FelipeEhrenberg, José Antonio Hernández. The members left an empty seat to represent the place “chance”occupies in their activities. Photograph courtesy of Víctor Muñoz.
170 Rubén Gallowith the government’s policies of violent repression. In one of its documents,the group claimed that “working in a group, that is to say, as a collective,was a necessary step to confront both the state’s bureaucratic apparatus thatadministers cultural life and the elitist maWas which—consciously or unconsciously—reproducethe dominant ideology.” 8 One of Proceso Pentágono’smost pressing concerns was to Wnd alternative exhibition venues that couldexist outside the “state’s bureaucratic apparatus.”This refusal to participate in government institutions led the groupsaway from the museum—a decision that, as Gregory Sholette has shown, wastaken by most activist artists around the world—and out on the street. 9 Todrive this point home, Proceso Pentágono staged one of its Wrst projects, “Anivel informativo” (On an Informational Level, 1973) on a street outsideMexico City’s most ofWcial museum: the Palace of Fine Arts, a corny, pretentious,cake-like marble behemoth that was the last public project commissionedby dictator PorWrio Díaz before being ousted by the revolution in 1910.“A NIVEL INFORMATIVO” (1973):BRINGING ART OUT ON THE STREETThe venue for “A nivel informativo” was politically charged. More than anyother government space, Bellas Artes, as the Palace of Fine Arts is knownto city dwellers, illustrated the vast disconnect between cultural institutionsand everyday life in the city. Bellas Artes stands in one of the liveliest andmost vibrant working-class neighborhoods in the city—the Centro—but itsinterior is a cold, tomblike, marble gallery. Outside there are crowds of streetvendors, book sellers peddling Marxist treatises carefully laid out on whitesheets on the sidewalk, Indian women begging for money with their babiesin tow, young couples making out, children screaming, and all kinds of peoplemaking a racket—young and old, rich and poor, employed and unemployed;inside, there are empty galleries illuminated by crystal chandeliers.The street outside Bellas Artes is dirty, full of food, garbage, detritusleft behind by the crowds; inside, the marble Xoors are kept spotless byan army of sweepers and cleaners. Outside, there is street culture: impromptuperformers—Wre-eaters, kids dressed as clowns, fortune-tellers—offering theirservices for a few pesos. Inside there is a ghostly space devoted to opera, ballet,and other spectacles of High Culture. Theodor Adorno once pointedout that the words “Museum and mausoleum are connected by more thanphonetic association. They testify to the neutralization of culture,” and nowhereis this more evident than around Bellas Artes: the street teems withlife; the museum is a mausoleum, a tomb, a dead space. 10When Proceso Pentágono was invited to present a project at
- Page 138 and 139: Performing Revolution 119strictures
- Page 140 and 141: Performing Revolution 121group, and
- Page 142 and 143: Performing Revolution 123lies in Gr
- Page 144 and 145: Performing Revolution 125problems i
- Page 146 and 147: Performing Revolution 127Grupo Prov
- Page 148 and 149: Performing Revolution 129from withi
- Page 150 and 151: FIGURE 5.3. Art-De (Juan-Sí Gonzá
- Page 152 and 153: Performing Revolution 133the museum
- Page 154 and 155: Performing Revolution 135distribute
- Page 156 and 157: Performing Revolution 137reason for
- Page 158 and 159: Performing Revolution 139which cons
- Page 160 and 161: Performing Revolution 141in which t
- Page 162 and 163: Performing Revolution 143perhaps be
- Page 164 and 165: Performing Revolution 145These priv
- Page 166 and 167: Performing Revolution 1478. Gerardo
- Page 168 and 169: Performing Revolution 14926. In 199
- Page 170 and 171: Performing Revolution 151which appr
- Page 172 and 173: Performing Revolution 153marginal z
- Page 174 and 175: Performing Revolution 155boy in que
- Page 176 and 177: Performing Revolution 157101. They
- Page 178 and 179: Performing Revolution 159And I beli
- Page 180 and 181: Performing Revolution 161structures
- Page 182 and 183: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 184 and 185: 6. The Mexican Pentagon: Adventures
- Page 186 and 187: The Mexican Pentagon 167grupos (the
- Page 190 and 191: The Mexican Pentagon 171Bellas Arte
- Page 192 and 193: The Mexican Pentagon 1735 million i
- Page 194 and 195: The Mexican Pentagon 175Wlled it wi
- Page 196 and 197: The Mexican Pentagon 177Ehrenberg a
- Page 198 and 199: The Mexican Pentagon 179of a campai
- Page 200 and 201: The Mexican Pentagon 181(including
- Page 202 and 203: The Mexican Pentagon 183contributed
- Page 204 and 205: The Mexican Pentagon 185criticisms,
- Page 206 and 207: The Mexican Pentagon 187material fo
- Page 208 and 209: The Mexican Pentagon 18911. The gro
- Page 210 and 211: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 212 and 213: 7. Artists’ Collectives: Focus on
- Page 214 and 215: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 216 and 217: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 218 and 219: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 220 and 221: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 222 and 223: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 224 and 225: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 226 and 227: FIGURE 7.7. Doug Ashford of Group M
- Page 228 and 229: FIGURE 7.9. General Idea, Baby Make
- Page 230 and 231: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 232 and 233: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 234 and 235: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
- Page 236 and 237: Artists’ Collectives Mostly in Ne
The Mexican Pentagon 169
It was against this background of repression and violence that the
groups made their appearance in the 1970s. They shared an interest in communicating
with people on the streets and exposing the criminal actions
of the Mexican regime. Out of all the groups, Proceso Pentágono was the
longest-lived, and the one that managed to articulate the most coherent
artistic and political program. I would like to devote the rest of this chapter
to analyzing three projects that demonstrate this group’s working methods
and political concerns: a 1973 street action, the group’s project for the 1977
Paris Biennale, and a 1980 book publication.
PROCESO PENTÁGONO
Proceso Pentágono was founded in 1973, the year of the military coup in
Chile, by Felipe Ehrenberg, Carlos Finck, José Antonio Hernández, and Víctor
Muñoz (Figure 6.2). Initially, the group was formed to search for alternatives
to the government-run museums and galleries in Mexico City—
locales that Proceso Pentágono denounced as complicit, however indirectly,
FIGURE 6.2. Proceso Pentágono, 1977. Left to right, Víctor Muñoz, Carlos Finck, Felipe
Ehrenberg, José Antonio Hernández. The members left an empty seat to represent the place “chance”
occupies in their activities. Photograph courtesy of Víctor Muñoz.