Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FX Liquidity Management: Addressing the challenges of a seriously complex undertaking<br />
TRADING OPERATIONS<br />
“When you add a new LP there is trading documentation<br />
and credit agreements to sign, integration work to be done<br />
and APIs to be used, and much more. It is a complex exercise<br />
that takes time and money and success cannot always be<br />
guaranteed. This should no longer be the case.”<br />
Guy Hopkins<br />
into the behaviour of each, says<br />
Durrant. “It will slice this data<br />
across any axis that the liquidity<br />
manager desires providing the ability<br />
to understand exactly how each<br />
instrument and liquidity provider<br />
performs at any time of the day and<br />
under different markets conditions.<br />
It will clearly identify trends in the<br />
data in a timely manner so liquidity<br />
management is no longer consigned<br />
to a quarterly review but can instead<br />
have daily, or even real-time, visibility.<br />
The benefit of this will clearly differ<br />
from company to company but we<br />
have clients who have saved millions<br />
of dollars on execution costs by<br />
optimising liquidity so the benefits are<br />
very clear.”<br />
“Such platforms are not cheap or easy<br />
to build and maintain. Fortunately,<br />
the advances in cloud infrastructure<br />
for elastic compute and storage<br />
along with the availability of cheaper<br />
time-series databases have made<br />
building and accessing data platforms<br />
easier than the once were. Building<br />
a full in-house liquidity management<br />
platform, however, is still a major<br />
undertaking that should not be taken<br />
lightly. There are some excellent third<br />
party providers in this space and<br />
many execution platforms offer such<br />
a service. Liquidity management is<br />
central to the offering at Reactive<br />
Markets and we have invested heavily<br />
in this technology for our clients.”<br />
Effective liquidity management also<br />
requires the ability to quickly action<br />
decisions in order to change the shape<br />
of the liquidity pool, says Durrant.<br />
“Consequently, a firm’s technical<br />
connectivity strategy must be agile<br />
enough to support these changing<br />
requirements. Similarly, platforms that<br />
provide centralised access to liquidity<br />
must be flexible and scalable enough<br />
to support bespoke pricing for each<br />
client and allow the LPs to provide a<br />
tailored pricing stream to meet their<br />
requirements.”<br />
IMPORTANT METRICS<br />
Clients are becoming more selective<br />
and deliberate about how they<br />
construct a pool of LPs, focusing less<br />
on the explicit number of LPs and<br />
more on the value each LP brings to<br />
the table, says Durrant. “Metrics such<br />
as market impact and rejection cost<br />
provide insights on overall cost of<br />
execution across counterparties, whilst<br />
pricing insights such as the percentage<br />
of time at top of book and spread<br />
comparisons versus a benchmark<br />
give clients a clearer picture of the<br />
current and potential value of these<br />
relationships.”<br />
This selectiveness also makes the<br />
auditing of FX Liquidity Management<br />
a more useful process, provided firms<br />
know who to achieve this benefit,<br />
says Durrant. “The benefit of an active<br />
liquidity management process should<br />
be clear. In its absence pricing quality<br />
and performance will often deteriorate<br />
over time. The hidden costs of trading<br />
in the spread and costs of rejects<br />
will inevitably increase and reduce<br />
execution performance. Opportunities<br />
to include specific LPs that can add<br />
value to areas of the liquidity pool may<br />
be missed.”<br />
Once a firm has decided that liquidity<br />
management is valuable, it is important<br />
to put in place a consistent process<br />
that is performed regularly, says<br />
Durrant. “They should have a clear idea<br />
on the design of their liquidity pool<br />
including the numbers and types of LPs<br />
they would like in that pool. Once they<br />
have the pool in place it is important<br />
to have a good understanding of how<br />
they will measure the performance<br />
of the LPs and the relative costs and<br />
benefits that each brings to the pool.<br />
For example, having a view of the<br />
costs of rejects can be as important<br />
as an overall spread number. Armed<br />
with the quantitative data, a regular<br />
discussion with the active LPs should<br />
be scheduled.”<br />
In order to drive this process, the firm<br />
needs access to the data and analysis<br />
insights, says Durrant. “If they can’t<br />
access it themselves then there are a<br />
number of third party providers who<br />
can help with this function. Indeed,<br />
there is often additional benefit with<br />
going externally as the providers will<br />
often have access to information that<br />
is not publicly available or available to<br />
the firm; for example, reference mid<br />
rates that can benchmark LPs or access<br />
to LP data that the firm is not currently<br />
trading with.”<br />
Relationships continue to be at the<br />
heart of liquidity management,<br />
says Durrant. “Building a trusting<br />
relationship with open dialogue<br />
between counterparties is key to a<br />
symbiotic pricing setup that works<br />
for all parties involved. Regular active<br />
22 JULY 20<strong>23</strong> e-FOREX