vdoc

03.05.2023 Views

318 Part IV: Quality Assuranceparticular problem-solving approach, it should be emphasized that for reasons ofconsistency and thoroughness, some standardized approach to problem solvingshould be adopted and used consistently to guide problem-solving efforts. Thereare two problem-solving approaches of interest to the CQI as follows:• The scientific method (a method not specifically related to quality)• Six Sigma (a method specifically related to quality)The Scientific MethodPart IV.DPerhaps the most noted and recognized approach to structured problem solvingis the scientific method. The scientific method is used in many fields of inquiryto guide problem-solving efforts in accordance with standardized steps, whichinclude:• Asking a question• Collecting data• Posing hypotheses• Testing hypotheses• Analyzing data• Drawing conclusions• Communicating resultsIt is true that the scientific method could be used to guide problem-solving effortsin quality and, if used properly, could be quite effective. Many of the tools andtechniques used in continuous improvement can readily be applied to supportand enhance the scientific method. What differentiates the scientific method fromother problem-solving methods used specifically to support continuous improvementis an absence of the common language, tools, and techniques used in thequality community.Six SigmaPerhaps the most common problem-solving approach used within the qualitycommunity today is Six Sigma (SS). SS is a five-step problem-solving approach;the steps are known as follows:• Define• Measure• Analyze• Improve• Control

Chapter 21: D. Quality Tools and Techniques 319The five steps of SS are most commonly referred to as the DMAIC methodology.Upon further analysis, we can see that each of the outcomes of the scientificmethod are found within the DMAIC methodology. Two primary points differentiatethe scientific method from SS: 1) use of quality-specific language and tools,and 2) use of the DMAIC methodology occurs in quality-related problem solvingwhen certain financial constraints or expectations have been met. The financialconstraints or expectations are related to the amount of cost savings expectedas a result of problem-solving activities to justify use of the comprehensive andsystematic DMAIC methodology. It is beyond the scope of this book and theCertified Quality Inspector Body of Knowledge to provide further content on SSand the DMAIC methodology. It should be emphasized however, that SS and theDMAIC methodology are, and will remain, a critically important problem-solvingapproach within the quality community, and the CQI is strongly encouraged tocontinue their professional development by learning more about this topic.The goal of all approaches to problem solving is identifying the reason(s) whya problem occurred. The process of identifying the true underlying reason(s) aproblem occurred is known as root cause analysis (RCA).ROOT CAUSE ANALYSISRCA is an approach to problem solving based on the identification of the trueunderlying reason(s) why a problem occurred. RCA is critically importantbecause any corrective action taken on a non–root cause issue or item will resultin the problem remaining active within a selected process. By remaining active,we mean that misapplied corrective action on a non–root cause issue or item maychange the appearance or manifestation of the original problem, but the originalproblem still exists.As with the other problem-solving approaches discussed above (that is, thescientific method and SS), RCA makes use of many of the quality-related toolsand techniques discussed thus far in this book. Also consistently with the otherproblem-solving approaches, RCA is intended to be iteratively applied whereinwith each iteration we contribute to continuous improvement. Also consistent withthe other problem-solving approaches, RCA has a structured approach, whichincludes the following:• Define the problem(s)• Identify manifestations of the problem(s)• Collect data• Identify root causes• Propose solutions• Test solutions• Verify effectiveness of solutionsPart IV.D

318 Part IV: Quality Assurance

particular problem-solving approach, it should be emphasized that for reasons of

consistency and thoroughness, some standardized approach to problem solving

should be adopted and used consistently to guide problem-solving efforts. There

are two problem-solving approaches of interest to the CQI as follows:

• The scientific method (a method not specifically related to quality)

• Six Sigma (a method specifically related to quality)

The Scientific Method

Part IV.D

Perhaps the most noted and recognized approach to structured problem solving

is the scientific method. The scientific method is used in many fields of inquiry

to guide problem-solving efforts in accordance with standardized steps, which

include:

• Asking a question

• Collecting data

• Posing hypotheses

• Testing hypotheses

• Analyzing data

• Drawing conclusions

• Communicating results

It is true that the scientific method could be used to guide problem-solving efforts

in quality and, if used properly, could be quite effective. Many of the tools and

techniques used in continuous improvement can readily be applied to support

and enhance the scientific method. What differentiates the scientific method from

other problem-solving methods used specifically to support continuous improvement

is an absence of the common language, tools, and techniques used in the

quality community.

Six Sigma

Perhaps the most common problem-solving approach used within the quality

community today is Six Sigma (SS). SS is a five-step problem-solving approach;

the steps are known as follows:

• Define

• Measure

• Analyze

• Improve

• Control

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!