vdoc
318 Part IV: Quality Assuranceparticular problem-solving approach, it should be emphasized that for reasons ofconsistency and thoroughness, some standardized approach to problem solvingshould be adopted and used consistently to guide problem-solving efforts. Thereare two problem-solving approaches of interest to the CQI as follows:• The scientific method (a method not specifically related to quality)• Six Sigma (a method specifically related to quality)The Scientific MethodPart IV.DPerhaps the most noted and recognized approach to structured problem solvingis the scientific method. The scientific method is used in many fields of inquiryto guide problem-solving efforts in accordance with standardized steps, whichinclude:• Asking a question• Collecting data• Posing hypotheses• Testing hypotheses• Analyzing data• Drawing conclusions• Communicating resultsIt is true that the scientific method could be used to guide problem-solving effortsin quality and, if used properly, could be quite effective. Many of the tools andtechniques used in continuous improvement can readily be applied to supportand enhance the scientific method. What differentiates the scientific method fromother problem-solving methods used specifically to support continuous improvementis an absence of the common language, tools, and techniques used in thequality community.Six SigmaPerhaps the most common problem-solving approach used within the qualitycommunity today is Six Sigma (SS). SS is a five-step problem-solving approach;the steps are known as follows:• Define• Measure• Analyze• Improve• Control
Chapter 21: D. Quality Tools and Techniques 319The five steps of SS are most commonly referred to as the DMAIC methodology.Upon further analysis, we can see that each of the outcomes of the scientificmethod are found within the DMAIC methodology. Two primary points differentiatethe scientific method from SS: 1) use of quality-specific language and tools,and 2) use of the DMAIC methodology occurs in quality-related problem solvingwhen certain financial constraints or expectations have been met. The financialconstraints or expectations are related to the amount of cost savings expectedas a result of problem-solving activities to justify use of the comprehensive andsystematic DMAIC methodology. It is beyond the scope of this book and theCertified Quality Inspector Body of Knowledge to provide further content on SSand the DMAIC methodology. It should be emphasized however, that SS and theDMAIC methodology are, and will remain, a critically important problem-solvingapproach within the quality community, and the CQI is strongly encouraged tocontinue their professional development by learning more about this topic.The goal of all approaches to problem solving is identifying the reason(s) whya problem occurred. The process of identifying the true underlying reason(s) aproblem occurred is known as root cause analysis (RCA).ROOT CAUSE ANALYSISRCA is an approach to problem solving based on the identification of the trueunderlying reason(s) why a problem occurred. RCA is critically importantbecause any corrective action taken on a non–root cause issue or item will resultin the problem remaining active within a selected process. By remaining active,we mean that misapplied corrective action on a non–root cause issue or item maychange the appearance or manifestation of the original problem, but the originalproblem still exists.As with the other problem-solving approaches discussed above (that is, thescientific method and SS), RCA makes use of many of the quality-related toolsand techniques discussed thus far in this book. Also consistently with the otherproblem-solving approaches, RCA is intended to be iteratively applied whereinwith each iteration we contribute to continuous improvement. Also consistent withthe other problem-solving approaches, RCA has a structured approach, whichincludes the following:• Define the problem(s)• Identify manifestations of the problem(s)• Collect data• Identify root causes• Propose solutions• Test solutions• Verify effectiveness of solutionsPart IV.D
- Page 276 and 277: 268 Part IV: Quality AssuranceA pro
- Page 278 and 279: 270 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCL =
- Page 280 and 281: 272 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEXAMP
- Page 282 and 283: 274 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart
- Page 284 and 285: 276 Part IV: Quality Assurancerespe
- Page 286 and 287: 278 Part IV: Quality Assurance• T
- Page 288 and 289: 280 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 290 and 291: 282 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 292 and 293: 284 Part IV: Quality AssuranceFirst
- Page 294 and 295: 286 Part IV: Quality Assuranceˆ c
- Page 296 and 297: 288 Part IV: Quality AssuranceIf ec
- Page 298 and 299: 290 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 300 and 301: 292 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 302 and 303: 294 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart
- Page 304 and 305: 296 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis un
- Page 306 and 307: 298 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 308 and 309: 300 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEXAMP
- Page 310 and 311: 302 Part IV: Quality Assurancewere
- Page 312 and 313: Chapter 20C. Quality Improvement1.
- Page 314 and 315: 306 Part IV: Quality Assurance2. Ap
- Page 316 and 317: 308 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTerms
- Page 318 and 319: 310 Part IV: Quality AssuranceRoles
- Page 320 and 321: 312 Part IV: Quality Assuranceexamp
- Page 322 and 323: Chapter 21D. Quality Tools and Tech
- Page 324 and 325: 316 Part IV: Quality AssurancePlanT
- Page 328 and 329: Chapter 22E. Resources1. ENVIRONMEN
- Page 330 and 331: 322 Part IV: Quality Assuranceand s
- Page 332 and 333: 324 Part IV: Quality AssuranceThrou
- Page 334 and 335: 326 Part IV: Quality Assurancewhere
- Page 336 and 337: 328 Part IV: Quality Assurance• S
- Page 338 and 339: 330 Part IV: Quality Assurance• K
- Page 340 and 341: About the Authors 425preparation co
- Page 342 and 343: xivList of Figures and TablesTable
- Page 344 and 345: xviList of Figures and TablesFigure
- Page 346 and 347: xviii List of Figures and TablesFig
- Page 348 and 349: 412 ReferencesChapter 7Bosch, J. A.
- Page 350 and 351: 414 ReferencesSimpson, J. A. 1981.
- Page 352 and 353: 416 ReferencesDeming, W. E. 1986. O
- Page 354 and 355: 418 ReferencesChapter 19Deleryd, M.
- Page 356 and 357: How to Use This BookTo assist reade
- Page 358 and 359: 2 Test Questions5. Solve the follow
- Page 360 and 361: 4 Test Questions14. The figure belo
- Page 362 and 363: 6 Test Questions23. The volume of a
- Page 364 and 365: 8 Test Questions35. The vernier cal
- Page 366 and 367: 10 Test Questions48. Which of the f
- Page 368 and 369: 12 Test Questions62. What number in
- Page 370 and 371: 14 Test Questions73. The process ca
- Page 372 and 373: 16 Test Questions85. A manufacturer
- Page 374 and 375: 18 Test Questions95. Which of the f
318 Part IV: Quality Assurance
particular problem-solving approach, it should be emphasized that for reasons of
consistency and thoroughness, some standardized approach to problem solving
should be adopted and used consistently to guide problem-solving efforts. There
are two problem-solving approaches of interest to the CQI as follows:
• The scientific method (a method not specifically related to quality)
• Six Sigma (a method specifically related to quality)
The Scientific Method
Part IV.D
Perhaps the most noted and recognized approach to structured problem solving
is the scientific method. The scientific method is used in many fields of inquiry
to guide problem-solving efforts in accordance with standardized steps, which
include:
• Asking a question
• Collecting data
• Posing hypotheses
• Testing hypotheses
• Analyzing data
• Drawing conclusions
• Communicating results
It is true that the scientific method could be used to guide problem-solving efforts
in quality and, if used properly, could be quite effective. Many of the tools and
techniques used in continuous improvement can readily be applied to support
and enhance the scientific method. What differentiates the scientific method from
other problem-solving methods used specifically to support continuous improvement
is an absence of the common language, tools, and techniques used in the
quality community.
Six Sigma
Perhaps the most common problem-solving approach used within the quality
community today is Six Sigma (SS). SS is a five-step problem-solving approach;
the steps are known as follows:
• Define
• Measure
• Analyze
• Improve
• Control