vdoc
274 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart IV.B.4time, or both, we do not want to take the measurements. We may prefer to use amore economical method such as a go/no-go gauge. Therefore, it is important thatwe study control charts that are appropriate for quality characteristics that can’t bemeasured numerically. Such control charts are called control charts for attributes. Inthis section, we study various control charts for attributes for detecting large processshifts, which usually occur in phase I implementation of SPC.When a quality characteristic can not be measured numerically we classifythe product as defective or nondefective. In SPC it has become more common touse the terminology conforming or nonconforming instead of nondefective or defective.Thus, in this section, we shall continue use of the terminology conforming ornonconforming. A quality characteristic that classifies any product as conformingor nonconforming is called an attribute.For instance, quality characteristics such as the determination that a soft drinkcan is not leaking, a stud has regular edges, a rod fits into a slot, a 100-watt lightbulb meets the desired standard, or a steel rivet meets the manufacturer’s qualityspecifications are some examples of attributes. Note that the data collectedon a quality characteristic that is an attribute is simply count data. Moreover, thesample sizes when using control charts for attributes are normally much larger(usually in the hundreds) than the sample of size four or five that we usually usein control charts for variables.In general, variable control charts are more informative and they are veryeffective in detecting a defect before even it occurs whereas attribute charts areused only after the defects have occurred. There are cases, however, when variablecontrol charts show some limitations. For example, consider a product that isnonconforming due to any one of 10 quality characteristics that do not conform tospecifications. Clearly, in this case we can not control all 10 quality characteristicsby using one variable control chart, since one variable control chart can controlonly one quality characteristic at a time. Thus, in this case, to control all 10 qualitycharacteristics we would have to use 10 different variable control charts. On theother hand, however, one attribute control chart can study all the quality characteristicsbecause a nonconforming unit is nonconforming irrespective of the numberof quality characteristics that do not conform to specifications. Thus, we canconclude that both variable and attribute control charts have their pros and cons.In some cases the quality characteristic is such that instead of classifying aunit as conforming or nonconforming, we record the number of nonconformitiesper manufactured unit. For example, the number of holes in a roll of paper, thenumber of irregularities per unit area of a spool of cloth, the number of blemisheson a painted surface, the number of loose ends in a circuit board, the number ofnonconformities per unit length of a cable, the number of nonconformities of alltypes in an assembled unit, and so on. In such cases, we use control charts thatfall under the category of control charts for attributes, and such control charts areused to reduce the number of nonconformities per unit length, area, or volume ofa single manufactured unit, or to reduce the number of nonconformities per manufacturedor assembled unit.The control charts for attributes are quite similar to the control charts for variables,that is, the center line and the control limits are set in the same manner asin the case of control charts for variables. However, it is important to note that thepurposes of using control charts for variables and control charts for attributes are
Chapter 19: B. Statistical Process Control 275Table 19.4 Control charts for attributes.Control chartp chartnp chartc chartu chartQuality characteristic under investigationPercent or fraction of nonconforming units in a subgroup or a sample, wheresample size can be variableNumber of nonconforming units in a sampleNumber of nonconformities in a sample or in one or more inspection unitsNumber of nonconformities per unit, where sample size can be variablequite distinct. As noted earlier, the purpose of using the control charts for variablesin any process is to reduce the variability due to special or assignable causes,whereas the control charts for attributes are used to reduce the number of nonconformingunits or to reduce the number of nonconformities per manufactured orassembled unit, or simply the number of nonconformities per unit length, area,or volume of a single manufactured unit.In this section, we are going to study four types of control charts for attributes:the p chart, np chart, c chart, and u chart. In Table 19.4, we give a very brief descriptionof these charts, which can help to determine the appropriate type of controlchart that should be used for the quality characteristic under investigation.The p Chart: Control Chart for Fraction of Nonconforming UnitsThe most frequently used attribute control chart is the p chart. This is used wheneverwe are interested in finding the fraction or percent of units that do not conformto the specifications in a situation where the observed quality characteristicis an attribute or a variable measured by a go/no-go gauge. A p chart can be usedto study one or more quality characteristics simultaneously. Since each inspectedunit is classified as conforming or nonconforming and it is assumed that the conformityor nonconformity of each unit is defined independently, which is trueonly if the process is stable, the probability of occurrence of a nonconforming unitat any given time is the same. Then the basic rules of the p chart are governedby the binomial probability distribution with parameters n and p, where n is thesample size and p is the fraction of nonconforming units produced by the processunder investigation.The binomial probability distribution function of a random variable X withparameters n and p is defined byPart IV.B.4nP X xx p xp n x( = )= ( 1)x = 0, 1,..., n . (19.29)The mean and the standard deviation of the random variable X are given bynp andnp( 1 p)
- Page 232 and 233: 224 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 234 and 235: 226 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTypes
- Page 236 and 237: 228 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 238 and 239: 230 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 240 and 241: 232 Part IV: Quality Assurancef (x)
- Page 242 and 243: 234 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 244 and 245: 236 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 246 and 247: 238 Part IV: Quality Assurances = 1
- Page 248 and 249: 240 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis th
- Page 250 and 251: 242 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 252 and 253: 244 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 254 and 255: Chapter 19B. Statistical Process Co
- Page 256 and 257: 248 Part IV: Quality AssuranceInfor
- Page 258 and 259: 250 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEnvir
- Page 260 and 261: 252 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTable
- Page 262 and 263: 254 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis ma
- Page 264 and 265: 256 Part IV: Quality Assuranceselec
- Page 266 and 267: 258 Part IV: Quality Assurance1.00.
- Page 268 and 269: 260 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCommo
- Page 270 and 271: 262 Part IV: Quality Assurance3. VA
- Page 272 and 273: 264 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCL =
- Page 274 and 275: 266 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 276 and 277: 268 Part IV: Quality AssuranceA pro
- Page 278 and 279: 270 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCL =
- Page 280 and 281: 272 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEXAMP
- Page 284 and 285: 276 Part IV: Quality Assurancerespe
- Page 286 and 287: 278 Part IV: Quality Assurance• T
- Page 288 and 289: 280 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 290 and 291: 282 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 292 and 293: 284 Part IV: Quality AssuranceFirst
- Page 294 and 295: 286 Part IV: Quality Assuranceˆ c
- Page 296 and 297: 288 Part IV: Quality AssuranceIf ec
- Page 298 and 299: 290 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 300 and 301: 292 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 302 and 303: 294 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart
- Page 304 and 305: 296 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis un
- Page 306 and 307: 298 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 308 and 309: 300 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEXAMP
- Page 310 and 311: 302 Part IV: Quality Assurancewere
- Page 312 and 313: Chapter 20C. Quality Improvement1.
- Page 314 and 315: 306 Part IV: Quality Assurance2. Ap
- Page 316 and 317: 308 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTerms
- Page 318 and 319: 310 Part IV: Quality AssuranceRoles
- Page 320 and 321: 312 Part IV: Quality Assuranceexamp
- Page 322 and 323: Chapter 21D. Quality Tools and Tech
- Page 324 and 325: 316 Part IV: Quality AssurancePlanT
- Page 326 and 327: 318 Part IV: Quality Assuranceparti
- Page 328 and 329: Chapter 22E. Resources1. ENVIRONMEN
- Page 330 and 331: 322 Part IV: Quality Assuranceand s
Chapter 19: B. Statistical Process Control 275
Table 19.4 Control charts for attributes.
Control chart
p chart
np chart
c chart
u chart
Quality characteristic under investigation
Percent or fraction of nonconforming units in a subgroup or a sample, where
sample size can be variable
Number of nonconforming units in a sample
Number of nonconformities in a sample or in one or more inspection units
Number of nonconformities per unit, where sample size can be variable
quite distinct. As noted earlier, the purpose of using the control charts for variables
in any process is to reduce the variability due to special or assignable causes,
whereas the control charts for attributes are used to reduce the number of nonconforming
units or to reduce the number of nonconformities per manufactured or
assembled unit, or simply the number of nonconformities per unit length, area,
or volume of a single manufactured unit.
In this section, we are going to study four types of control charts for attributes:
the p chart, np chart, c chart, and u chart. In Table 19.4, we give a very brief description
of these charts, which can help to determine the appropriate type of control
chart that should be used for the quality characteristic under investigation.
The p Chart: Control Chart for Fraction of Nonconforming Units
The most frequently used attribute control chart is the p chart. This is used whenever
we are interested in finding the fraction or percent of units that do not conform
to the specifications in a situation where the observed quality characteristic
is an attribute or a variable measured by a go/no-go gauge. A p chart can be used
to study one or more quality characteristics simultaneously. Since each inspected
unit is classified as conforming or nonconforming and it is assumed that the conformity
or nonconformity of each unit is defined independently, which is true
only if the process is stable, the probability of occurrence of a nonconforming unit
at any given time is the same. Then the basic rules of the p chart are governed
by the binomial probability distribution with parameters n and p, where n is the
sample size and p is the fraction of nonconforming units produced by the process
under investigation.
The binomial probability distribution function of a random variable X with
parameters n and p is defined by
Part IV.B.4
n
P X x
x p x
p n x
( = )=
( 1
)
x = 0, 1,..., n . (19.29)
The mean and the standard deviation of the random variable X are given by
np and
np( 1 p)