vdoc
266 Part IV: Quality AssuranceContinuedTable 19.3Diameter measurements (mm) of ball bearings used in the wheels of heavyconstruction equipment.Sample Observations x – i R iPart IV.B.31 15.155 15.195 15.145 15.125 15.155 0.0702 15.095 15.162 15.168 15.163 15.147 0.0733 15.115 15.126 15.176 15.183 15.150 0.0684 15.122 15.135 15.148 15.155 15.140 0.0335 15.148 15.152 15.192 15.148 15.160 0.0446 15.169 15.159 15.173 15.175 15.169 0.0167 15.163 15.147 15.137 15.145 15.148 0.0268 15.150 15.164 15.156 15.170 15.160 0.0209 15.148 15.162 15.163 15.147 15.155 0.01610 15.152 15.138 15.167 15.155 15.153 0.02911 15.147 15.158 15.175 15.160 15.160 0.02812 15.158 15.172 15.142 15.120 15.148 0.05213 15.133 15.177 15.145 15.165 15.155 0.04414 15.148 15.174 15.155 15.175 15.155 0.02715 15.143 15.137 15.164 15.156 15.150 0.02716 15.142 15.150 15.168 15.152 15.153 0.02617 15.132 15.168 15.154 15.146 15.150 0.03618 15.172 15.188 15.178 15.194 15.183 0.02219 15.174 15.166 15.186 15.194 15.180 0.02820 15.166 15.178 15.192 15.184 15.180 0.02621 15.172 15.187 15.193 15.180 15.183 0.02122 15.182 15.198 15.185 15.195 15.190 0.01623 15.170 15.150 15.192 15.180 15.173 0.04224 15.186 15.194 15.175 15.185 15.185 0.01925 15.178 15.192 15.168 15.182 15.180 0.024x – = 15.1628– R = 0.03479Continued
Chapter 19: B. Statistical Process Control 267ContinuedSample meanX – chart1UCL = 15.1881415.1815.1615.14X – = 15.1628LCL = 15.137462 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24SampleR chart0.08 UCL = 0.07936Sample range0.060.040.020.002 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24SampleR – = 0.03479LCL = 0Figure 19.8 X – and R control chart for the ball bearing data in Table 19.3.It is customary to prepare the R chart first and verify that all the plotted points fall withinthe control limits, and only then proceed to constructing the X – chart. In fact, the conceptof bringing the process variability under control first and then proceeding to controlthe average does make a lot of sense. This is due to the fact that without controlling theprocess variability, it is almost impossible to bring the process average under control.The R chart for the data in Table 19.3 is given in Figure 19.8, which shows that allthe plotted points fall within the control limits and there is no evidence of any specialpattern. Thus, we may conclude that the only variation present in the process is due tocommon causes. In this case we can proceed further to calculate the control limits forthe X – chart. From Appendix E for sample of size n = 4, we get A 2 = 0.729. Thus, we havePart IV.B.3LCL = x A 2R = 15. 1628 0. 729× 0. 03479 = 15.13746UCL = x + A 2R = 15. 1628+ 0. 729× 0. 03479 = 15. 18814.The X – chart for the data is given in Figure 19.8, which shows that point 22 exceeds theupper control limits. Moreover, there are too many consecutive points that fall belowthe center line. This indicates that the process is not under control and there are somespecial causes present that are affecting the process average. Thus, a thorough investigationshould be launched to find the special causes, and appropriate action shouldbe taken to eliminate these special causes before we proceed to recalculate the controllimits for the ongoing process.
- Page 224 and 225: 216 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 226 and 227: 218 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart
- Page 228 and 229: 220 Part IV: Quality AssuranceDot P
- Page 230 and 231: 222 Part IV: Quality AssuranceBar C
- Page 232 and 233: 224 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 234 and 235: 226 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTypes
- Page 236 and 237: 228 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 238 and 239: 230 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 240 and 241: 232 Part IV: Quality Assurancef (x)
- Page 242 and 243: 234 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 244 and 245: 236 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 246 and 247: 238 Part IV: Quality Assurances = 1
- Page 248 and 249: 240 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis th
- Page 250 and 251: 242 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 252 and 253: 244 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 254 and 255: Chapter 19B. Statistical Process Co
- Page 256 and 257: 248 Part IV: Quality AssuranceInfor
- Page 258 and 259: 250 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEnvir
- Page 260 and 261: 252 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTable
- Page 262 and 263: 254 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis ma
- Page 264 and 265: 256 Part IV: Quality Assuranceselec
- Page 266 and 267: 258 Part IV: Quality Assurance1.00.
- Page 268 and 269: 260 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCommo
- Page 270 and 271: 262 Part IV: Quality Assurance3. VA
- Page 272 and 273: 264 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCL =
- Page 276 and 277: 268 Part IV: Quality AssuranceA pro
- Page 278 and 279: 270 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCL =
- Page 280 and 281: 272 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEXAMP
- Page 282 and 283: 274 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart
- Page 284 and 285: 276 Part IV: Quality Assurancerespe
- Page 286 and 287: 278 Part IV: Quality Assurance• T
- Page 288 and 289: 280 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 290 and 291: 282 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 292 and 293: 284 Part IV: Quality AssuranceFirst
- Page 294 and 295: 286 Part IV: Quality Assuranceˆ c
- Page 296 and 297: 288 Part IV: Quality AssuranceIf ec
- Page 298 and 299: 290 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 300 and 301: 292 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 302 and 303: 294 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart
- Page 304 and 305: 296 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis un
- Page 306 and 307: 298 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 308 and 309: 300 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEXAMP
- Page 310 and 311: 302 Part IV: Quality Assurancewere
- Page 312 and 313: Chapter 20C. Quality Improvement1.
- Page 314 and 315: 306 Part IV: Quality Assurance2. Ap
- Page 316 and 317: 308 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTerms
- Page 318 and 319: 310 Part IV: Quality AssuranceRoles
- Page 320 and 321: 312 Part IV: Quality Assuranceexamp
- Page 322 and 323: Chapter 21D. Quality Tools and Tech
Chapter 19: B. Statistical Process Control 267
Continued
Sample mean
X – chart
1
UCL = 15.18814
15.18
15.16
15.14
X – = 15.1628
LCL = 15.13746
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample
R chart
0.08 UCL = 0.07936
Sample range
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample
R – = 0.03479
LCL = 0
Figure 19.8 X – and R control chart for the ball bearing data in Table 19.3.
It is customary to prepare the R chart first and verify that all the plotted points fall within
the control limits, and only then proceed to constructing the X – chart. In fact, the concept
of bringing the process variability under control first and then proceeding to control
the average does make a lot of sense. This is due to the fact that without controlling the
process variability, it is almost impossible to bring the process average under control.
The R chart for the data in Table 19.3 is given in Figure 19.8, which shows that all
the plotted points fall within the control limits and there is no evidence of any special
pattern. Thus, we may conclude that the only variation present in the process is due to
common causes. In this case we can proceed further to calculate the control limits for
the X – chart. From Appendix E for sample of size n = 4, we get A 2 = 0.729. Thus, we have
Part IV.B.3
LCL = x A 2
R = 15. 1628 0. 729× 0. 03479 = 15.
13746
UCL = x + A 2
R = 15. 1628+ 0. 729× 0. 03479 = 15. 18814.
The X – chart for the data is given in Figure 19.8, which shows that point 22 exceeds the
upper control limits. Moreover, there are too many consecutive points that fall below
the center line. This indicates that the process is not under control and there are some
special causes present that are affecting the process average. Thus, a thorough investigation
should be launched to find the special causes, and appropriate action should
be taken to eliminate these special causes before we proceed to recalculate the control
limits for the ongoing process.