vdoc
256 Part IV: Quality Assuranceselection of a subgroup or sample is perhaps the most important item in setting upa control chart. The next question in the selection of a sample is to determine thesample size. Factors that are usually taken into consideration for determiningthe sample size and the frequency of the samples are the average run length (ARL)and the operating characteristic curve, which is also known as the OC curve.AVERAGE RUN LENGTHA run is a number of successive items possessing the same characteristics. Forexample, number of successive conforming or successive nonconforming forms arun. An average run length (ARL) is the average number of points plotted, that is,the number of subgroups inspected before a point falls outside the control limits,indicating that the process is out of control.In Shewhart control charts the ARL can be determined by using the formulaARL = 1 p(19.1)where p is the probability that any point falls outside the control limits. It is quitecommon to use ARL as a benchmark to check the performance of a control chart.As an illustration, consider a process quality characteristic that is normallydistributed. Then for an X – control chart with three-sigma control limits, the probabilitythat a point will fall outside the control limits when the process is stable isp = 0.0027, which is the probability that a normal random variable deviates fromthe mean m by at least three s. Thus, the average run length for the X – control chartwhen the process is stable isPart IV.B1ARL 0= =370.0.0027In other words, when the process is stable we should expect that, on the average,one out-of-control signal or false alarm will occur once in every 370 samples. TheARL can also be used to determine how often a false alarm will occur, simply bymultiplying the ARL 0 by the time t between the samples. Thus, for example, ifsamples are taken every 30 minutes, then a false alarm will occur on the averageonce every 185 hours. On the other hand, ARL can be used in the same manner tofind how long it will take before a given shift in the process mean is detected. Weillustrate this concept with Example 19.2 using an X – control chart.In practice, the decision of how large and how frequently the samples shouldbe taken is based on the cost of taking samples and how quickly we would like todetect the shift. Large samples taken more frequently would certainly give betterprotection against shifts, since it will take less time to detect any given shift.Thus, for instance, in Example 19.2, if the samples are taken every half an hourinstead of every hour then it will take only one hour instead of taking two hoursto detect the shift of 1.5s. Similarly, it can easily be shown that if larger samplesare taken, the shifts can be detected more quickly. This means if large samples aretaken more frequently, shifts in the process mean will be detected faster, and theprocess will be producing fewer nonconforming units. Thus, when calculating
Chapter 19: B. Statistical Process Control 257EXAMPLE 19.2Suppose a process quality characteristic that is normally distributed is plotted in aShewhart X – control chart with three-sigma control limits. Suppose that the processmean m 0 experiences an upward shift of 1.5s. Determine how long, on the average, itwill take to detect this shift if samples of size four are taken every hour.Solution:Since the process mean has experienced an upward shift of 1.5s the new process meanwill be m 0 + 1.5s. Furthermore, since the sample size is four, the upper control limit inthis case is alsosm0 + 3s x= m0 + 3 = m0+ 15 . s.4In other words, the center line of the control chart will coincide with the upper controllimit. Thus, the probability p that a point will fall beyond the control limits isp= P( z 6)+ P( z 0) 0. 00000+ 0. 5 = 0. 5.Therefore, the ARL is given by1ARL = =05 .2.Thus, it will take, on the average, two hours to detect a shift of 1.5s in the processmean.the cost of taking samples one must take into account how much money willbe saved by detecting shifts more quickly and consequently producing fewernonconforming units.OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVEThe operating characteristic curve is a graph characterizing the relationship betweenthe probabilities of type II error (b ) and the process shifts. The operating characteristiccurves are usually known as OC curves.A set of OC curves are shown in Figure 19.7 for the x – chart with three-sigmalimits, for different sample sizes n. The units of scale on the horizontal axis are inprocess standard deviation s.By carefully observing the OC curves in Figure 19.7, we see that:1. For a given sample size n and a, where a is the probability of apoint exceeding the control limits when the process is stable, a largershift corresponds to a smaller probability, b.2. With a larger sample size there is a smaller probability (b ) for a givenprocess shift.For a detailed discussion of the construction of an operating characteristic curve,refer to Gupta and Walker (2007a).Part IV.B
- Page 214 and 215: 206 Part IV: Quality AssuranceMean
- Page 216 and 217: 208 Part IV: Quality AssuranceVaria
- Page 218 and 219: 210 Part IV: Quality Assurance98.7%
- Page 220 and 221: 212 Part IV: Quality Assurance3. ME
- Page 222 and 223: 214 Part IV: Quality Assurance25% 2
- Page 224 and 225: 216 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 226 and 227: 218 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart
- Page 228 and 229: 220 Part IV: Quality AssuranceDot P
- Page 230 and 231: 222 Part IV: Quality AssuranceBar C
- Page 232 and 233: 224 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 234 and 235: 226 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTypes
- Page 236 and 237: 228 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 238 and 239: 230 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 240 and 241: 232 Part IV: Quality Assurancef (x)
- Page 242 and 243: 234 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 244 and 245: 236 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 246 and 247: 238 Part IV: Quality Assurances = 1
- Page 248 and 249: 240 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis th
- Page 250 and 251: 242 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 252 and 253: 244 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 254 and 255: Chapter 19B. Statistical Process Co
- Page 256 and 257: 248 Part IV: Quality AssuranceInfor
- Page 258 and 259: 250 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEnvir
- Page 260 and 261: 252 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTable
- Page 262 and 263: 254 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis ma
- Page 266 and 267: 258 Part IV: Quality Assurance1.00.
- Page 268 and 269: 260 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCommo
- Page 270 and 271: 262 Part IV: Quality Assurance3. VA
- Page 272 and 273: 264 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCL =
- Page 274 and 275: 266 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 276 and 277: 268 Part IV: Quality AssuranceA pro
- Page 278 and 279: 270 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCL =
- Page 280 and 281: 272 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEXAMP
- Page 282 and 283: 274 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart
- Page 284 and 285: 276 Part IV: Quality Assurancerespe
- Page 286 and 287: 278 Part IV: Quality Assurance• T
- Page 288 and 289: 280 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 290 and 291: 282 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 292 and 293: 284 Part IV: Quality AssuranceFirst
- Page 294 and 295: 286 Part IV: Quality Assuranceˆ c
- Page 296 and 297: 288 Part IV: Quality AssuranceIf ec
- Page 298 and 299: 290 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 300 and 301: 292 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 302 and 303: 294 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart
- Page 304 and 305: 296 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis un
- Page 306 and 307: 298 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 308 and 309: 300 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEXAMP
- Page 310 and 311: 302 Part IV: Quality Assurancewere
- Page 312 and 313: Chapter 20C. Quality Improvement1.
Chapter 19: B. Statistical Process Control 257
EXAMPLE 19.2
Suppose a process quality characteristic that is normally distributed is plotted in a
Shewhart X – control chart with three-sigma control limits. Suppose that the process
mean m 0 experiences an upward shift of 1.5s. Determine how long, on the average, it
will take to detect this shift if samples of size four are taken every hour.
Solution:
Since the process mean has experienced an upward shift of 1.5s the new process mean
will be m 0 + 1.5s. Furthermore, since the sample size is four, the upper control limit in
this case is also
s
m0 + 3s x
= m0 + 3 = m0
+ 15 . s.
4
In other words, the center line of the control chart will coincide with the upper control
limit. Thus, the probability p that a point will fall beyond the control limits is
p= P( z 6)+ P( z 0)
0. 00000+ 0. 5 = 0. 5.
Therefore, the ARL is given by
1
ARL = =
05 .
2.
Thus, it will take, on the average, two hours to detect a shift of 1.5s in the process
mean.
the cost of taking samples one must take into account how much money will
be saved by detecting shifts more quickly and consequently producing fewer
nonconforming units.
OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE
The operating characteristic curve is a graph characterizing the relationship between
the probabilities of type II error (b ) and the process shifts. The operating characteristic
curves are usually known as OC curves.
A set of OC curves are shown in Figure 19.7 for the x – chart with three-sigma
limits, for different sample sizes n. The units of scale on the horizontal axis are in
process standard deviation s.
By carefully observing the OC curves in Figure 19.7, we see that:
1. For a given sample size n and a, where a is the probability of a
point exceeding the control limits when the process is stable, a larger
shift corresponds to a smaller probability, b.
2. With a larger sample size there is a smaller probability (b ) for a given
process shift.
For a detailed discussion of the construction of an operating characteristic curve,
refer to Gupta and Walker (2007a).
Part IV.B