vdoc
254 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis made to detect the cause and perpetuate it instead of eliminating it. In this manner,the process can eventually be brought into a state of statistical control.Dr. Shewhart, the inventor of control charts, recommended very strongly thata process should not be judged to be in control unless the pattern of random variationhas persisted for some time and for a sizeable volume of output.Note: If a control chart shows a process in statistical control this doesnot mean that all special causes have been eliminated completely; rather it simplymeans that for all practical purposes it is reasonable to assume or adopt a hypothesisof common causes only.Preparation for Use of Control ChartsPart IV.BIn order for control charts to serve their intended purpose, it is important totake a few preparatory steps prior to the implementation of control charts. Thesesteps are:1. Establish an environment suitable for action. Any statistical method will failunless management has prepared a responsive environment.2. Define the process and determine the characteristics to be studied. The processmust be understood in terms of its relationship to the other operations/users, and in terms of the process elements (for example, people,equipment, materials, methods, and environment) that affect it at eachstage. Some of the techniques discussed earlier such as Pareto analysisor the fishbone chart can help make these relationships visible. Oncethe process is well understood then the next step is to determine whichcharacteristics are affecting the process, which characteristics should bestudied in depth, and which characteristics should be controlled.3. Correlation between characteristics. For an efficient and effective study,take advantage of the relationship between characteristics. If severalcharacteristics of an item tend to vary together, it may be sufficientto chart only one of them. If there are some characteristics that arenegatively correlated, a deeper study is required before any correctiveaction can be taken on such characteristics.4. Define the measurement system. The characteristic must be operationallydefined so that the findings can be communicated to all concernedin ways that have the same meaning today as they did yesterday.This includes specifying what information is to be gathered, where,how, and under what conditions. The operational definition is veryimportant for collecting data since it can impact the control chartsin many ways. Moreover, the analysis of data depends on how thedata are collected. Thus, it is extremely important that the data containthe pertinent information and are valid (for example, appropriatesampling schemes are used) so that its analysis and the interpretationof the results is done appropriately. Moreover, one should alwayskeep in mind that each measurement system has its own inherentvariability. Thus, the accuracy of any measurement system is asimportant as the elimination of the special causes affecting the process.
Chapter 19: B. Statistical Process Control 2555. Minimize unnecessary variation. Unnecessary external causes of variationshould be reduced before the study begins. This includes overcontrollingthe process or avoiding obvious problems that could and should becorrected even without the use of control charts.6. Customer’s needs. This includes both any subsequent processes that usethe product or service as an input, and the final end item customer. Forexample, any computer manufacturing company is a customer of thesemiconductor industry, a car manufacturing company is a customerof tire manufacturing companies, and in a paper mill the papermakingunit is a customer of the pulpmaking unit.Note that in all cases, a process log should be kept. It should include all relevantevents (big or small) such as procedural changes, new raw materials, or change ofoperators. This will aid in subsequent problem analysis.Benefits of Control ChartsProperly used, control charts can:1. Be used by operators for ongoing control of a process2. Help the process perform consistently and predictably3. Allow the process to achieve higher quality, higher effective capacity(since there will be either no or fewer rejections), and hence lowercost per unit4. Provide a common language for discussing process performance5. Help distinguish special causes from common causes of variabilityand hence serve as a guide for management to take local actionor action on the systemRational Subgroups for Control ChartsIt is very important to note that the rational subgroup or sample used to prepare acontrol chart should represent subgroups of output that are as homogeneous aspossible. In other words, the subgroups should be such that if special causes arepresent, they will show up in differences between the subgroups rather than indifferences between the members of a subgroup. A natural subgroup, for example,would be the output of a given shift. It is not correct to take the product for an arbitrarilyselected period of time as a subgroup, especially if it overlaps two or moreshifts. This is because if a sample comes from two or more shifts then any differencebetween the shifts will be averaged out and consequently the plotted pointwon’t indicate the presence of any special cause due to shifts. As another example,if the process used six machines it would be better to take a separate sample fromthe output of each machine than to have samples each consisting of items fromall six machines. This is due to the fact that the difference between machines maybe the special cause of variation. It will be hard to detect this special cause if thesamples are not taken from individual machines. Thus, it is true to say that carefulPart IV.B
- Page 212 and 213: 204 Part IV: Quality AssuranceFinal
- Page 214 and 215: 206 Part IV: Quality AssuranceMean
- Page 216 and 217: 208 Part IV: Quality AssuranceVaria
- Page 218 and 219: 210 Part IV: Quality Assurance98.7%
- Page 220 and 221: 212 Part IV: Quality Assurance3. ME
- Page 222 and 223: 214 Part IV: Quality Assurance25% 2
- Page 224 and 225: 216 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 226 and 227: 218 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart
- Page 228 and 229: 220 Part IV: Quality AssuranceDot P
- Page 230 and 231: 222 Part IV: Quality AssuranceBar C
- Page 232 and 233: 224 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 234 and 235: 226 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTypes
- Page 236 and 237: 228 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 238 and 239: 230 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 240 and 241: 232 Part IV: Quality Assurancef (x)
- Page 242 and 243: 234 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 244 and 245: 236 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 246 and 247: 238 Part IV: Quality Assurances = 1
- Page 248 and 249: 240 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis th
- Page 250 and 251: 242 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 252 and 253: 244 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 254 and 255: Chapter 19B. Statistical Process Co
- Page 256 and 257: 248 Part IV: Quality AssuranceInfor
- Page 258 and 259: 250 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEnvir
- Page 260 and 261: 252 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTable
- Page 264 and 265: 256 Part IV: Quality Assuranceselec
- Page 266 and 267: 258 Part IV: Quality Assurance1.00.
- Page 268 and 269: 260 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCommo
- Page 270 and 271: 262 Part IV: Quality Assurance3. VA
- Page 272 and 273: 264 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCL =
- Page 274 and 275: 266 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 276 and 277: 268 Part IV: Quality AssuranceA pro
- Page 278 and 279: 270 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCL =
- Page 280 and 281: 272 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEXAMP
- Page 282 and 283: 274 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart
- Page 284 and 285: 276 Part IV: Quality Assurancerespe
- Page 286 and 287: 278 Part IV: Quality Assurance• T
- Page 288 and 289: 280 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 290 and 291: 282 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 292 and 293: 284 Part IV: Quality AssuranceFirst
- Page 294 and 295: 286 Part IV: Quality Assuranceˆ c
- Page 296 and 297: 288 Part IV: Quality AssuranceIf ec
- Page 298 and 299: 290 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 300 and 301: 292 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 302 and 303: 294 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart
- Page 304 and 305: 296 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis un
- Page 306 and 307: 298 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 308 and 309: 300 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEXAMP
- Page 310 and 311: 302 Part IV: Quality Assurancewere
254 Part IV: Quality Assurance
is made to detect the cause and perpetuate it instead of eliminating it. In this manner,
the process can eventually be brought into a state of statistical control.
Dr. Shewhart, the inventor of control charts, recommended very strongly that
a process should not be judged to be in control unless the pattern of random variation
has persisted for some time and for a sizeable volume of output.
Note: If a control chart shows a process in statistical control this does
not mean that all special causes have been eliminated completely; rather it simply
means that for all practical purposes it is reasonable to assume or adopt a hypothesis
of common causes only.
Preparation for Use of Control Charts
Part IV.B
In order for control charts to serve their intended purpose, it is important to
take a few preparatory steps prior to the implementation of control charts. These
steps are:
1. Establish an environment suitable for action. Any statistical method will fail
unless management has prepared a responsive environment.
2. Define the process and determine the characteristics to be studied. The process
must be understood in terms of its relationship to the other operations/
users, and in terms of the process elements (for example, people,
equipment, materials, methods, and environment) that affect it at each
stage. Some of the techniques discussed earlier such as Pareto analysis
or the fishbone chart can help make these relationships visible. Once
the process is well understood then the next step is to determine which
characteristics are affecting the process, which characteristics should be
studied in depth, and which characteristics should be controlled.
3. Correlation between characteristics. For an efficient and effective study,
take advantage of the relationship between characteristics. If several
characteristics of an item tend to vary together, it may be sufficient
to chart only one of them. If there are some characteristics that are
negatively correlated, a deeper study is required before any corrective
action can be taken on such characteristics.
4. Define the measurement system. The characteristic must be operationally
defined so that the findings can be communicated to all concerned
in ways that have the same meaning today as they did yesterday.
This includes specifying what information is to be gathered, where,
how, and under what conditions. The operational definition is very
important for collecting data since it can impact the control charts
in many ways. Moreover, the analysis of data depends on how the
data are collected. Thus, it is extremely important that the data contain
the pertinent information and are valid (for example, appropriate
sampling schemes are used) so that its analysis and the interpretation
of the results is done appropriately. Moreover, one should always
keep in mind that each measurement system has its own inherent
variability. Thus, the accuracy of any measurement system is as
important as the elimination of the special causes affecting the process.