vdoc
218 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart IV.A.4Let X 1 , . . . , X n be a set of quantitative data. We would like to construct afrequency distribution table for this data set. In order to prepare such a table weneed to go through the following steps.Notes:Step 1. Find the range of the data that is defined asRange (R) = largest data point – smallest data point (18.13)Step 2. Divide the data set into an appropriate number of classes/categories.The appropriate number of classes/categories is commonly definedby using Sturgis’s formula as follows:m = 1 + 3.3 log n (18.14)Where n is the total number of data points in a given data set.Step 3. Determine the width of classes as follows:Class width = R/m (18.15)Step 4. Finally, prepare the frequency distribution table by assigning eachdata point to an appropriate class or category. While assigningthese data points to a class, we must be particularly careful toensure that each data point be assigned to one, and only one,class and that the whole set must be included in the table. Anotherimportant point is that the class on the lowest end of the scale mustbe started with a number that is less than or equal to the smallestdata point and that the class on the highest end of the scale mustend with a number that is greater than or equal to the largest datapoint in the data set.1. Quite often when we determine the class width, the number obtainedby dividing R with m is not an easy number to work with. In such caseswe should always round this number up, preferably to a whole number.Never round it down.2. When we use Sturgis’s formula to find the number of classes, the valueof m is usually not a whole number. In that case one must round itup or down to a whole number since the number of classes can onlybe a whole number.EXAMPLE 18.17The following data define the lengths (in millimeters) of 40 randomly selected rodsmanufactured by a company:145 140 120 110 135 150 130 132 137 115142 115 130 124 139 133 118 127 144 143Continued
Chapter 18: A. Basic Statistics and Applications 219Continued131 120 117 129 148 130 121 136 133 147147 128 142 147 152 122 120 145 126 151Prepare a frequency distribution table for these data.Solution:Following the steps described above, we have1. Range (R) = 152 –110 = 422. Number of classes = 1 + 3.3 log 40 = 6.29, which, by rounding becomes 63. Class width = R/m = 42/6 = 7The six classes we use to prepare the frequency distribution table are as follows:110 – under 117, 117 – under 124, 124 – under 131,131 – under 138, 138 – under 145, 145 – 152.Note that in the case of quantitative data, each class is defined by two numbers. Thesmaller of the two numbers is usually called the lower limit and the larger is calledthe upper limit. Also, note that except for the last class the upper limit does not belongto the class. This means, for example, that the data point 117 will be assigned to classtwo and not class one. This way no two classes have any common point, which ensuresthat each data point will belong to one and only one class. For simplification we will usemathematical notations to denote the above classes as[110 – 117), [117 – 124), [124 – 131), [131 – 138), [138 – 145), [145 –152]where customarily the square bracket symbol “[“ implies that the beginning pointbelongs to the class and the parenthesis “)” implies that the end point does not belongto the class. The frequency distribution table for the data in this example is then asshown in Table 18.4.Table 18.4 Frequency table for the data on rod lengths.Category Relative Cumulativeno. Tally Frequency frequency Percentage frequencyPart IV.A.4[110–117) /// 3 3/40 7.5 3[117–124) ///// // 7 7/40 17.5 10[124–131) ///// /// 8 8/40 20.0 18[131–138) ///// // 7 7/40 17.5 25[138–145) ///// / 6 6/40 15.0 31[145–152] ///// //// 9 9/40 22.5 40Total 40 1 100%Having discussed the frequency distribution table we are now ready to study variousgraphical displays of a data set.
- Page 176 and 177: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 178 and 179: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 180 and 181: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 182 and 183: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 184 and 185: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 186 and 187: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 188 and 189: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 190 and 191: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 181
- Page 192 and 193: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 183F
- Page 194 and 195: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 185M
- Page 196 and 197: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 187C
- Page 198 and 199: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 189m
- Page 200 and 201: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 191i
- Page 202 and 203: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 193F
- Page 204 and 205: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 195O
- Page 206 and 207: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 197
- Page 208 and 209: Chapter 18A. Basic Statistics and A
- Page 210 and 211: 202 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEXAMP
- Page 212 and 213: 204 Part IV: Quality AssuranceFinal
- Page 214 and 215: 206 Part IV: Quality AssuranceMean
- Page 216 and 217: 208 Part IV: Quality AssuranceVaria
- Page 218 and 219: 210 Part IV: Quality Assurance98.7%
- Page 220 and 221: 212 Part IV: Quality Assurance3. ME
- Page 222 and 223: 214 Part IV: Quality Assurance25% 2
- Page 224 and 225: 216 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 228 and 229: 220 Part IV: Quality AssuranceDot P
- Page 230 and 231: 222 Part IV: Quality AssuranceBar C
- Page 232 and 233: 224 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 234 and 235: 226 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTypes
- Page 236 and 237: 228 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 238 and 239: 230 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 240 and 241: 232 Part IV: Quality Assurancef (x)
- Page 242 and 243: 234 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 244 and 245: 236 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 246 and 247: 238 Part IV: Quality Assurances = 1
- Page 248 and 249: 240 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis th
- Page 250 and 251: 242 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 252 and 253: 244 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 254 and 255: Chapter 19B. Statistical Process Co
- Page 256 and 257: 248 Part IV: Quality AssuranceInfor
- Page 258 and 259: 250 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEnvir
- Page 260 and 261: 252 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTable
- Page 262 and 263: 254 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis ma
- Page 264 and 265: 256 Part IV: Quality Assuranceselec
- Page 266 and 267: 258 Part IV: Quality Assurance1.00.
- Page 268 and 269: 260 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCommo
- Page 270 and 271: 262 Part IV: Quality Assurance3. VA
- Page 272 and 273: 264 Part IV: Quality AssuranceCL =
- Page 274 and 275: 266 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
218 Part IV: Quality Assurance
Part IV.A.4
Let X 1 , . . . , X n be a set of quantitative data. We would like to construct a
frequency distribution table for this data set. In order to prepare such a table we
need to go through the following steps.
Notes:
Step 1. Find the range of the data that is defined as
Range (R) = largest data point – smallest data point (18.13)
Step 2. Divide the data set into an appropriate number of classes/categories.
The appropriate number of classes/categories is commonly defined
by using Sturgis’s formula as follows:
m = 1 + 3.3 log n (18.14)
Where n is the total number of data points in a given data set.
Step 3. Determine the width of classes as follows:
Class width = R/m (18.15)
Step 4. Finally, prepare the frequency distribution table by assigning each
data point to an appropriate class or category. While assigning
these data points to a class, we must be particularly careful to
ensure that each data point be assigned to one, and only one,
class and that the whole set must be included in the table. Another
important point is that the class on the lowest end of the scale must
be started with a number that is less than or equal to the smallest
data point and that the class on the highest end of the scale must
end with a number that is greater than or equal to the largest data
point in the data set.
1. Quite often when we determine the class width, the number obtained
by dividing R with m is not an easy number to work with. In such cases
we should always round this number up, preferably to a whole number.
Never round it down.
2. When we use Sturgis’s formula to find the number of classes, the value
of m is usually not a whole number. In that case one must round it
up or down to a whole number since the number of classes can only
be a whole number.
EXAMPLE 18.17
The following data define the lengths (in millimeters) of 40 randomly selected rods
manufactured by a company:
145 140 120 110 135 150 130 132 137 115
142 115 130 124 139 133 118 127 144 143
Continued