vdoc
Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 195Operatingpositionh136°136°dFigure 17.16 The Vickers hardness test.area normal to the force, and is therefore not a pressure. This test, the same as theother tests, uses an indenter to test the metal but in the shape of diamond with 136degrees between opposite faces (see Figure 17.16).The two diagonals of the indentation left in the surface of the material afterremoval of the load are measured using a microscope, and their average calculated.The area of the sloping surface of the indentation is calculated. The Vickershardness is the quotient obtained by dividing the kgf load by the square mm areaof indentation.The advantages of the Vickers hardness test are that extremely accurate readingscan be taken, and just one type of indenter is used for all types of metals andsurface treatments. Although thoroughly adaptable and very precise for testingthe softest and hardest of materials under varying loads, the Vickers machine is afloor-standing unit that is more expensive than the Brinell or Rockwell machines(Surface Engineering Forum 2008) (CALCE 2001).Part III.D.4Microhardness TestMicrohardness testing of metals, ceramics, and composites is useful for a varietyof applications where other test methods are not useful, such as testing very thinmaterials like foils, measuring individual microstructures within a larger matrix,or measuring the hardness gradients of a part along the cross section. Microhardnesstesting gives an allowable range of loads for testing with a diamond indenter;the resulting indentation is measured and converted to a hardness value (SurfaceEngineering Forum 2008) (CALCE 2001).The term microhardness test usually refers to static indentations made withloads not exceeding one kgf. The indenter is either the Vickers diamond pyramidor the Knoop elongated diamond pyramid. The procedure for testing is very similarto that of the standard Vickers hardness test, except that it is done on a microscopicscale with higher-precision instruments. The surface being tested generallyrequires a metallographic finish; the smaller the load used, the higher the surface
196 Part III: Inspection and Testfinish required. Precision microscopes are used to measure the indentations; theseusually have a magnification of around ×500 and measure to an accuracy of ±0.5micrometers (Surface Engineering Forum 2008).5. VERIFICATION OF SOFTWARE FOR TEST EQUIPMENTIdentify and define basic steps to ensure thatthe software for test equipment adequatelyand correctly performs its intendedfunctions by safeguarding, functional checks,comparison of test results and identificationof attributes and parameters. (Knowledge)Body of Knowledge III.D.5Part III.D.5Verification of software for test equipment is a process for determining whetherthe software for these test equipment fulfill the requirements, purpose, and accuracyof the test intended.Software Verification Objectives• Software verification determines that the software performs itsintended functions correctly.• Ensure that the software performs no unintended functions.• Measure and assess the quality and reliability of software.• As a systems engineering discipline, software verification alsoassesses, analyzes, and tests the software on:– How it interfaces with systems elements– How it influences performance– How it reacts to stimuli from system elementsBasic principles for software testing:• Define the expected output or result, including the attributes andparameters.• Define how the software should function to get the results.• Compare test results with real results to make sure of the consistencyand accuracy of the software• Include test cases for invalid or unexpected conditions.
- Page 154 and 155: Chapter 14: A. Geometric Dimensioni
- Page 156 and 157: Chapter 14: A. Geometric Dimensioni
- Page 158 and 159: Chapter 14: A. Geometric Dimensioni
- Page 160 and 161: Chapter 15: B. Sampling 151units pr
- Page 162 and 163: Chapter 15: B. Sampling 153Acceptan
- Page 164 and 165: Chapter 15: B. Sampling 155TYPES OF
- Page 166 and 167: Chapter 15: B. Sampling 157• Prec
- Page 168 and 169: Chapter 15: B. Sampling 159Section
- Page 170 and 171: Chapter 15: B. Sampling 1613.2 If t
- Page 172 and 173: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 174 and 175: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 176 and 177: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 178 and 179: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 180 and 181: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 182 and 183: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 184 and 185: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 186 and 187: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 188 and 189: Chapter 16: C. Inspection Planning
- Page 190 and 191: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 181
- Page 192 and 193: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 183F
- Page 194 and 195: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 185M
- Page 196 and 197: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 187C
- Page 198 and 199: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 189m
- Page 200 and 201: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 191i
- Page 202 and 203: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 193F
- Page 206 and 207: Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 197
- Page 208 and 209: Chapter 18A. Basic Statistics and A
- Page 210 and 211: 202 Part IV: Quality AssuranceEXAMP
- Page 212 and 213: 204 Part IV: Quality AssuranceFinal
- Page 214 and 215: 206 Part IV: Quality AssuranceMean
- Page 216 and 217: 208 Part IV: Quality AssuranceVaria
- Page 218 and 219: 210 Part IV: Quality Assurance98.7%
- Page 220 and 221: 212 Part IV: Quality Assurance3. ME
- Page 222 and 223: 214 Part IV: Quality Assurance25% 2
- Page 224 and 225: 216 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 226 and 227: 218 Part IV: Quality AssurancePart
- Page 228 and 229: 220 Part IV: Quality AssuranceDot P
- Page 230 and 231: 222 Part IV: Quality AssuranceBar C
- Page 232 and 233: 224 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 234 and 235: 226 Part IV: Quality AssuranceTypes
- Page 236 and 237: 228 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 238 and 239: 230 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 240 and 241: 232 Part IV: Quality Assurancef (x)
- Page 242 and 243: 234 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 244 and 245: 236 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 246 and 247: 238 Part IV: Quality Assurances = 1
- Page 248 and 249: 240 Part IV: Quality Assuranceis th
- Page 250 and 251: 242 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
- Page 252 and 253: 244 Part IV: Quality AssuranceConti
Chapter 17: D. Testing Methods 195
Operating
position
h
136°
136°
d
Figure 17.16 The Vickers hardness test.
area normal to the force, and is therefore not a pressure. This test, the same as the
other tests, uses an indenter to test the metal but in the shape of diamond with 136
degrees between opposite faces (see Figure 17.16).
The two diagonals of the indentation left in the surface of the material after
removal of the load are measured using a microscope, and their average calculated.
The area of the sloping surface of the indentation is calculated. The Vickers
hardness is the quotient obtained by dividing the kgf load by the square mm area
of indentation.
The advantages of the Vickers hardness test are that extremely accurate readings
can be taken, and just one type of indenter is used for all types of metals and
surface treatments. Although thoroughly adaptable and very precise for testing
the softest and hardest of materials under varying loads, the Vickers machine is a
floor-standing unit that is more expensive than the Brinell or Rockwell machines
(Surface Engineering Forum 2008) (CALCE 2001).
Part III.D.4
Microhardness Test
Microhardness testing of metals, ceramics, and composites is useful for a variety
of applications where other test methods are not useful, such as testing very thin
materials like foils, measuring individual microstructures within a larger matrix,
or measuring the hardness gradients of a part along the cross section. Microhardness
testing gives an allowable range of loads for testing with a diamond indenter;
the resulting indentation is measured and converted to a hardness value (Surface
Engineering Forum 2008) (CALCE 2001).
The term microhardness test usually refers to static indentations made with
loads not exceeding one kgf. The indenter is either the Vickers diamond pyramid
or the Knoop elongated diamond pyramid. The procedure for testing is very similar
to that of the standard Vickers hardness test, except that it is done on a microscopic
scale with higher-precision instruments. The surface being tested generally
requires a metallographic finish; the smaller the load used, the higher the surface