27.12.2012 Views

l - People

l - People

l - People

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

hinge residues to be hypermutable. Also, the near neighbors of active site residues have<br />

no particular reason to be conserved and thus their enrichment in hinges seems unlikely<br />

to counter the tendency toward hypermutability.<br />

This raises the question, why would residues that are functionally important not be<br />

conserved? The answer may be that it is the intricate network of interactions within the<br />

hydrophobic core of rigid regions on either side of the hinge that needs to be conserved,<br />

and not the hinges themselves. The importance of the stability of these domains rather<br />

than of any detailed properties of the hinges themselves is underscored by the significant<br />

success of structure-based hinge predictors which analyze the interactions within the<br />

domains and between the domains and the solvent, but which pay no particular attention<br />

to the hinge region itself (Flores and Gerstein, submitted), or which implicitly or<br />

explicitly find highly interconnected regions of the protein.<br />

One might also ask, is it possible that co-evolution (alternatively called compensatory<br />

mutation or mutational correlation) occurs in hinge residues even in the absence of<br />

independent (single-site) conservation? Repeatedly investigators have found that co-<br />

evolving residue pairs tend to be proximal in space and stabilize proteins, for instance by<br />

periodically bridging consecutive turns of α-helices or by interacting across the contact<br />

interface between two such helices. This is an active area of research with possible future<br />

implications on hinge finding.<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!