27.12.2012 Views

l - People

l - People

l - People

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

potential for simplification, motion prediction for these has remained largely an unsolved<br />

problem. We resolve the motion by first detecting the hinge, then accelerating the rigid<br />

body motions of the domains.<br />

Early evolutionary studies indicated that the stabilizing interactions within domains were<br />

more important than interactions at the hinge. This was consistent with the general<br />

consensus that structural domains are independently stable. Our first method for<br />

detecting the domain boundaries consisted of breaking the protein into two fragments by<br />

making some of the many possible combinations of two cuts on the backbone and then<br />

separating the resulting two fragments (one continuous and one discontinuous[112]) and<br />

computing their stabilities. We found that indeed the cuts that coincided with the hinge<br />

resulted in the most stable fragments.<br />

In a second method, we studied the correlations of atoms assuming a Hookean potential.<br />

Under these circumstances not only the spectral decomposition but also the equipartition<br />

theorem apply. The motional correlations of residues in a thermal ensemble generated in<br />

the eigenvector basis were analyzed with a view to finding a single domain of maximal<br />

size with high average interresidue correlation.<br />

Additional methods were developed, and some existing methods were tested. In Chapter<br />

4 we integrate all of these into a single combined method which emits several hinge<br />

predictions and assigns a confidence score to each.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!