27.04.2023 Views

The New Plex

© Philippe Fournier 2023. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited unless advanced written permission is granted by the author. Final self-directed research project completed in fulfilment of the requirements for the Master of Architecture degree at McGill University. Summary: A multiplex is a low-rise multifamily residential building with two or more separately accessed dwelling units, built at a similar scale to a traditional house. To address severe housing shortages, many jurisdictions across North America and around the globe are reforming long-standing zoning laws to permit multiplex construction across vast areas of land which formerly only permitted building single-family houses. This opens up a new frontier of design possibilities for builders: how should these buildings be designed? Though well established across the province of Quebec and once historically common in many other places, multiplexes are rare in the rest of postwar North America, with the majority of private households now dwelling in single-family detached houses. The scale of the housing crisis demands a radical expansion of denser building stock, but the carbon intensity of large-scale new construction poses environmental problems. As an example of ‘missing middle’ housing, multiplexes have many advantages which make them opportune for addressing both the housing and climate crises simultaneously. While increasing density and housing options, plexes have the advantage of being small enough to construct in light wood frame, embodying low carbon and employing local materials and trades. Their human scale and adaptability can allow them to blend unobtrusively within the built character of many established suburban neighborhoods. Their low capital requirements would permit a competitive market to emerge among small builders, while their rapid constructability lends itself well to prefabrication and other efficient construction techniques. This project revisits historical North American multiplex designs, makes the argument for streamlining multiplex construction in contemporary infill suburban contexts, investigates their regulatory and practical constraints, and explores ways of designing the typology in order to improve its environmental performance, cost effectiveness, and above all the quality of life for residents.

© Philippe Fournier 2023. All rights reserved.
Reproduction prohibited unless advanced written permission is granted by the author.

Final self-directed research project completed in fulfilment of the requirements for the Master of Architecture degree at McGill University.

Summary:

A multiplex is a low-rise multifamily residential building with two or more separately accessed dwelling units, built at a similar scale to a traditional house. To address severe housing shortages, many jurisdictions across North America and around the globe are reforming long-standing zoning laws to permit multiplex construction across vast areas of land which formerly only permitted building single-family houses. This opens up a new frontier of design possibilities for builders: how should these buildings be designed? Though well established across the province of Quebec and once historically common in many other places, multiplexes are rare in the rest of postwar North America, with the majority of private households now dwelling in single-family detached houses. The scale of the housing crisis demands a radical expansion of denser building stock, but the carbon intensity of large-scale new construction poses environmental problems.

As an example of ‘missing middle’ housing, multiplexes have many advantages which make them opportune for addressing both the housing and climate crises simultaneously. While increasing density and housing options, plexes have the advantage of being small enough to construct in light wood frame, embodying low carbon and employing local materials and trades. Their human scale and adaptability can allow them to blend unobtrusively within the built character of many established suburban neighborhoods. Their low capital requirements would permit a competitive market to emerge among small builders, while their rapid constructability lends itself well to prefabrication and other efficient construction techniques. This project revisits historical North American multiplex designs, makes the argument for streamlining multiplex construction in contemporary infill suburban contexts, investigates their regulatory and practical constraints, and explores ways of designing the typology in order to improve its environmental performance, cost effectiveness, and above all the quality of life for residents.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.



Sky Plex

Narrow + Attached

Habitat Plex

Narrow + Detached

Flex Plex

Wide + Detached

Fourplex + Accessory

5 units Total

Toronto Draft Plan Amendment

(pending, 2023)

+

+

Duplex + Accessory

3 units Total

or

Triplex

3 Total

Ontario Bill 23 (Passed 2022)

properties that immediately abut these high-density

zones. This results in many ‘yellowbelt’ areas of

low density single-family homes falling within a

ten minute walk of major transit stops, as shown

in the map above, opposite This is an extremely

inefficient use of both the land and by extension

the taxpayer money invested in the transit system,

which will be underused relative to its capacity so

long as building supply in close proximity is not

maximized. One of Toronto’s existng subway lines,

Line 4, loses $10 per passenger due to low ridership.

Therefore for this project, I focus my case studies

on yellowbelt sites that are outside these ten-minute

walk zones. These outside zones are not necessarily

poorly served by transit, however; they typically

are well connected to streetcars and bus routes,

and within walking or biking distance to arterials.

Furthermore, introducing mixed commercial uses

and other amenities within these zones can improve

their walkability and thereby reduce the number

local car trips. Generally the higher capacity

the transit service, the higher density should be

promoted around it.

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!