10.04.2023 Views

TIAPS Module 1 Audit and Assurance workbook

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

According to The IIA Position Paper: The Internal <strong>Audit</strong> Charter, the document should<br />

contain the following:<br />

• Internal audit mission <strong>and</strong> purpose.<br />

• Reference to or inclusion of the m<strong>and</strong>atory elements of the IPPF by which the<br />

internal audit function will be governed. (Recognizing the m<strong>and</strong>atory elements of the<br />

IPPF in the charter is a requirement of St<strong>and</strong>ard 1010 – Recognizing M<strong>and</strong>atory<br />

Guidance in the Internal <strong>Audit</strong> Charter.)<br />

• Authority, clarifying the functional <strong>and</strong> administrative reporting relationships <strong>and</strong> the<br />

role of the governing body in upholding the authority of the internal audit function.<br />

• Independence <strong>and</strong> objectivity, ensuring the head of internal audit will safeguard the<br />

independence of the function <strong>and</strong> the objectivity of auditors, applying safeguards<br />

when required, <strong>and</strong> reporting threats <strong>and</strong> limits to independence <strong>and</strong> objectivity to<br />

the governing when they arise.<br />

• Scope to confirm the internal audit’s responsibility for providing assurance <strong>and</strong><br />

advice on the adequacy <strong>and</strong> effectiveness of governance, risk management, <strong>and</strong><br />

internal control.<br />

• Responsibilities of the head of internal audit.<br />

• Requirements for a quality assurance <strong>and</strong> improvement program, including an<br />

external quality review at least once every five years. 30<br />

Without sufficient authority, the internal audit function is unable to fulfil its m<strong>and</strong>ate. Its work<br />

may be obstructed by managers who are not interested or who would prefer to avoid scrutiny<br />

for whatever reason. Internal audit may also be constrained by limited resources or by being<br />

denied access to information it needs to complete its work. There is a close link between<br />

authority <strong>and</strong> independence. The pronouncements of the internal audit function are more<br />

likely to be considered authoritative if it operates independently but it is only able to do that if<br />

it has sufficient force behind it, whether by legislation or the endorsement of the governing<br />

body (ideally both).<br />

According to the IIA, to ensure the internal audit function has sufficient authority, the<br />

governing body (or audit committee) is expected to:<br />

• Approve the internal audit charter.<br />

• Approve the internal audit plan.<br />

• Approve the internal audit budget <strong>and</strong> resource plan.<br />

• Receive timely communications on performance relative to the internal audit plan.<br />

• Approve the appointment <strong>and</strong> removal of the head of internal audit (typically in<br />

response to discussions with <strong>and</strong> recommendations from senior management).<br />

• Approve the remuneration of the head of internal audit (typically in response to<br />

discussions with <strong>and</strong> recommendations from senior management).<br />

• Make appropriate inquiries of management <strong>and</strong> the head of internal audit to<br />

determine if there are any inappropriate scope or resource limitations.<br />

• Ensure the head of internal audit has unrestricted access to, <strong>and</strong> can communicate<br />

<strong>and</strong> interact directly with, the governing body without management present.<br />

30<br />

IIA Position Paper: The Internal <strong>Audit</strong> Charter, The Institute of Internal <strong>Audit</strong>ors, 2019<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!