10.04.2023 Views

TIAPS Module 1 Audit and Assurance workbook

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The principles of good governance can be applied holistically to an organization <strong>and</strong> to the<br />

public sector in its entirety. They can also be considered in the context of an individual<br />

project or initiative as well as groups of activities, such as IT governance, where matters are<br />

sufficiently complex <strong>and</strong>/or important to require specific attention not just on completion of<br />

tasks but also at a more strategic level. Governance takes account of factors such as risks,<br />

stakeholder needs, long-term planning <strong>and</strong> resource requirements, laws <strong>and</strong> regulations,<br />

<strong>and</strong> sustainability.<br />

The distinction between managing <strong>and</strong> governing is not absolute. The concepts as well as<br />

the roles of individuals tend to overlap. The chief executive officer (CEO) (i.e., secretary<br />

general, executive director, deputy minister, or similar) often sits at the intersection of the<br />

governing body <strong>and</strong> senior management. Most organizational responsibilities include some<br />

decision-making as well as oversight of <strong>and</strong> responsibility for resources <strong>and</strong> their utilization,<br />

including people <strong>and</strong> money. Monitoring <strong>and</strong> appropriate intervention are required by both<br />

managers <strong>and</strong> directors. Governing bodies involve themselves to a greater or lesser extent<br />

with both strategy <strong>and</strong> operations <strong>and</strong> are responsible for appointing (<strong>and</strong> firing) the CEO.<br />

While accepting the likelihood of overlap, in general terms we can make the following<br />

distinction:<br />

Focus of Governance<br />

• Overseeing<br />

• Advising<br />

• Guiding<br />

• Developing strategy<br />

• High level, long-term, big picture<br />

perspective<br />

• Non-executive decisions<br />

Focus of Management<br />

• Planning<br />

• Directing<br />

• Controlling<br />

• Implementing strategy<br />

• Operational, detailed, logistical<br />

perspective<br />

• Executive decisions<br />

The expression “those charged with governance” is often used to allow for the many<br />

differences that exist in how governance responsibilities are apportioned. It avoids arbitrarily<br />

limiting governance duties to the governing body (however that may be constituted) as well<br />

as removing the necessity of listing everyone who may be considered as holding<br />

governance responsibilities. Both the expression <strong>and</strong> the success of governance rely on<br />

clarity of exactly who is “charged with governance.” The primary stakeholders are assumed<br />

– explicitly or implicitly – to be the ones to “charge” the governing body <strong>and</strong> others with<br />

responsibility for governance <strong>and</strong> this links closely with the principle of accountability. When<br />

public officials are using public resources to achieve something on behalf of the public, they<br />

have a duty of care to the public for governance of those activities. Those charged with<br />

governance have both legal <strong>and</strong> ethical duties.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!