27.12.2012 Views

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In the Matter of<br />

)<br />

)<br />

DANIEL CHAER ONE,<br />

a corporation,<br />

)<br />

)<br />

)<br />

)<br />

JAMES FEIJO,<br />

individually, and as an officer of<br />

Daniel Chapter One.<br />

)<br />

)<br />

)<br />

)<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br />

FEDERA TRAE COMMISSION<br />

Docket No. 9329<br />

PUBLIC DOCUMENT<br />

COMPLAI COUNSEL'S POST-TRI BRIEF<br />

The evidence at tral demonstrated that Respondents Danel Chapter One ("DCO") and<br />

James Feijo violated Sections 5(a) and 12 of<br />

the <strong>Federal</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> Commssion Act (the "FTC Act")<br />

when marketing their Bio*Shark, 7 Herb Formula, GDU, and BioMixx products (collectively,<br />

the "DCO Products"). Respondents represented in their adverisements and promotional<br />

materals disseminated on the Interet that the DCO Products were effective in preventing,<br />

treating, or curg cancer or tuors. Respondents preyed upon desperate, sick consumers<br />

"suffer(ing) from any tye of cancer." Respondents touted the DCO Products as "Cancer<br />

solutions" that would "stop tuor growth," "fight() tuor formation," and otherise ''battle()<br />

cancer." Indeed, Respondents admt that they made the following health and disease clais<br />

about the DCO Products:<br />

a. Bio*Shark inbits tuor growth;<br />

b. Bio*Shark is effective in the treatment of cancer;<br />

c. 7 Herb Formula is effective in the treatment or cure of cancer;<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!