27.12.2012 Views

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

352. LaMont acknowledged that there have been no clinical studies perormed on the DCO<br />

Products. (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 48); LaMont, Tr. 579).<br />

353. The DCO products "are not silver bullets." (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 127)).<br />

354. LaMont does not know the Feijos. (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 49)).<br />

their oncologist<br />

and utilze protocols that are proven to be most effective for their cancer and that they<br />

355. LaMont this that it is "best that people follow the recommendations of<br />

should be well-informed of the potential value of the aray of other therapies." (R22<br />

(LaMont, Dep. at 49)).<br />

I'm workig with a patient, I'm going to insist that<br />

they work with their oncologist and follow their advice and I'm going to comanage their<br />

care." (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 51-52)).<br />

356. LaMont testified that "as a doctor, if<br />

plant<br />

foods and medicines should not influence patients with cancer and other serous diseases<br />

to abandon using the most effective methods that moder medicine has to offer." (R22<br />

(LaMont, Dep. at 52)).<br />

357. LaMont believes that "(t)he awareness of the powerl chemoprotective effects of<br />

358. LaMont would not be comfortable with the Feijos sayig that the DCO products are<br />

going to cure cancer. (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 53)).<br />

359. LaMont can see why the <strong>Federal</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> would have concers about the<br />

statement that DCO's products are cancer solutions. (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 127)).<br />

360. LaMont would not have wrtten the text that way to include "cancer solutions" next to the<br />

DCO products. (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 128)).<br />

361. LaMont does not "believe that on their own across the board these (DCO) products are<br />

going to effectively treat cancer." (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 53)).<br />

362. LaMont did not listen to the Feijo's radio show nor did she have the interest in listenig<br />

to their show. (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 77)).<br />

that she would defend the DCO products because she has limted<br />

363. LaMont did not say<br />

knowledge of their products. (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 78)).<br />

364. LaMont has never used the DCO products. (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 78); LaMont, Tr. 578­<br />

79).<br />

365. LaMont has not studied the DCO products specifically. (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 87-88);<br />

LaMont, Tr. 579).<br />

366. LaMont acknowledges that traditional use evidence does not replace human clinical<br />

trals. (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 89); LaMont, Tr. 584).<br />

367. LaMont acknowledges that it is not a common occurence in the industr to make cancer<br />

cure or cancer treatment claims. (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 144-45)).<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!