27.12.2012 Views

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

306. Roy did not conduct any work or tests on any product made by Respondents. (R20 (Roy,<br />

Dep. at 8)).<br />

307. Roy is not an expert in homeopathy. (R20 (Roy, Dep. at 12)).<br />

308. Roy and his laboratory do "zero clincal trals." (R20 (Roy, Dep. at 13)).<br />

309. Roy and his laboratory "have nothg to do with causing healing or not in a human<br />

being." (R20 (Roy, Dep. at 13)).<br />

310. Roy has not measured the effcacy of<br />

the DCO Products. (R20 (Roy, Dep. at 14)).<br />

311. Roy has never done any experents to measure the effcacy of any medical treatments<br />

"at the human leveL." (R20 (Roy, Dep. at 14)).<br />

312. Roy has no idea what the DCO Products contain. (R20 (Roy, Dep. at 24)).<br />

313. Roy has not done any literatue searches or any literatue research concerg any of the<br />

ingredients in DCO's products. (R20 (Roy, Dep. at 25)).<br />

314. Roy does not have any formal traing in medicine. (R20 (Roy, Dep. at 26)).<br />

315. Roy has never treated or consulted with healers who were treatig paricular patients.<br />

(R20 (Roy, Dep. at 28)).<br />

316. Roy does not know what Danel Chapter One sells. (R20 (Roy, Dep. at 43)).<br />

317. The practice of Danel Chapter One sellng products over the Interet to people that it<br />

had never seen, met, or examed the medical records for "obviously limts"<br />

homeopathy. (R20 (Roy, Dep. at 50)).<br />

318. Roy's ideal descrption of<br />

homeopathy would not include selling products over the<br />

Interet to persons that the seller has not met. (R20 (Roy, Dep. at 51)).<br />

319. It is not Roy's view that all herbal remedies are effective. (R20 (Roy, Dep. at 60-61)).<br />

320. Roy has never been involved in trg to secure FDA approval for some medication.<br />

(R20 (Roy, Dep. at 79)).<br />

Sallv B. LaMont. N.D.<br />

321. Respondents offer Sally B. LaMont, N.D. ("LaMont") as "an exper in natuopathc<br />

medical, herbal medicine, fuctional medicine. . . (and) as an exper on nutrtional<br />

supplements and botancal medicines in the prevention and treatment of ilness and as an<br />

expert in reviewing the evidence that supports the fuctional issues of the four products<br />

that are the challenged products." (Deposition of<br />

refered to as R22 (LaMont, Dep. at --) at 7-8).<br />

Sally B. LaMont, N.D. (hereinafter<br />

322. LaMont has never previously been asked to be an expert. (R22 (LaMont, Dep. at 54)).<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!