27.12.2012 Views

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

246. Duke does not recall any holistic physicians who have consulted with him on the<br />

treatment of cancer. (R18 (Duke, Dep. at 19)).<br />

247. Duke does not recall any homeopaths who have consulted with him on the treatment of<br />

cancer. (R18 (Duke, Dep. at 19)).<br />

248. Duke has never managed or paricipated in any studies to measure the effcacy of an herb<br />

in treating cancer. (R18 (Duke, Dep. at 29); Duke, Tr. 522).<br />

249. Duke does not remember ever being a consultant on a study where the anticancer effects<br />

of an herb were being measured on a group of patients. (R18 (Duke, Dep. at 29-30);<br />

Duke, Tr. 523).<br />

250. Duke does not remember seeing the FTC's <strong>Complaint</strong> against Respondents. (R18 (Duke,<br />

Dep. at 36)).<br />

251. Duke has no knowledge of any of the adverisements that the FTC has challenged as the<br />

predicate for the <strong>Complaint</strong>. (R18 (Duke, Dep. at 36-37); Duke, Tr. 534).<br />

252. Dukewas not sent any of<br />

Respondents' products and has never seen them. (R18 (Duke,<br />

Dep. at 37); Duke, Tr. 524).<br />

253. Duke has not spoken to any persons who have taken DCO products for the treatment of<br />

cancer. (R18 (Duke, Dep. at 38)).<br />

254. Duke has not reviewed the medical records of anyone who clais to have taken DCO<br />

products for the treatment of cancer. (R18 (Duke, Dep. at 39)).<br />

255. Duke had never heard ofDCO until ths case. (R18 (Duke, Dep. at 39)).<br />

256. Duke remembers being quite surrised when he leared that most ofthe list of chemcals<br />

that Respondents were studyig were not biblical. (Duke, Tr. 536.)<br />

257. Duke has never listened to the DCO Radio program. (R18 (Duke, Dep. at 39)).<br />

258. Duke knows of no tests where the patient prays and one group of patients gets a<br />

Biblically referenced herb and the other group of patient prays and gets an allopathc<br />

treatment. (R18 (Duke, Dep. at 41-42)).<br />

259. Duke does not th that ''the FDA perts adverising for cancer uness clincally<br />

proven." (R18 (Duke, Dep. at 46)).<br />

260. Duke's "Multiple Activity Menus" ("MAs") are an attempt to identify herbs that show<br />

promise in fightig disease. (R18 (Duke, Dep. at 91)).<br />

261. The MA and the ratio that it yields does not prove that anyone of these herbs is<br />

effective in fighting or treating cancer. Rather, "(i)t adds a listing of the chemicals in that<br />

herb that have been shown or assumed to help with cancer." (R18 (Duke, Dep. at 92)).<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!