Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission
Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission
Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
199. Respondents' substantiation for the statement that "(p lure skeletal tissue of sharks . . .<br />
can stop tuor growth" is "from the materal that ( they) had read that shark carilage<br />
provides a protein that inhbits angiogenesis and the information (they) have that (they)<br />
have. . . read and complied for many years now." (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 157)).<br />
200. Patrcia Feijo is not aware of any other studies that might have been done on Bio*Shark<br />
or shark carilage other than Dr. Lane's studies. (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 162)).<br />
201. Although Respondents relied upon Dr. Lane's book, "Sharks Don't Get Cancer," for<br />
substantiation, Respondent James Feijo never read it. (J. Feijo, Tr. 449).<br />
202. Universal Nutrtion did not conduct any testing, quality or otherise, on Bio*Shark.<br />
(R17 (Bauhoffer-Kinney, Dep. at 45-46)).<br />
7 Herb Formula<br />
203. Respondents never had an outside lab study the components of7 Herb Formula to see<br />
whether its components actually have the effect that Respondents believe it has. (R 16 (P.<br />
Feijo, Dep. at 132)).<br />
204. Rather than having an outside lab study the components of7 Herb Formula to detere<br />
whether its components were actually having the effect Respondents believe,<br />
Respondents have "experential information (and) many testimonies, many hundreds if<br />
not thousands oftestimonies." (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 132))..<br />
205. Respondents' basis for asserg that using 7 Herb Formula wil help someone with any<br />
tye of cancer is "their knowledge about the strctue/fuction of the separate ingredients<br />
and the history of the herbal formally, so experentially. . . (they) can say generally that<br />
if you suffer from any tye of cancer that (Respondents) suggest takng (7 Herb<br />
Formula)." (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 175-76)).<br />
GDU<br />
206. GDU was never subjected to clinical trals. (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 190)).<br />
207. Respondents have not done any studies to know whether GDU would counteract with any<br />
conventional cancer medicine someone was takg. (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 194)).<br />
BioMI<br />
208. Respondents did not conduct any tests or clinical studies on BioMixx. (R16 (P. Feijo,<br />
Dep. at 199)).<br />
209. Respondents did not engage anybody else to do any kind of clinical tests on BioMixx.<br />
(R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 199)).<br />
210. Respondents' basis for assering that BioMixx fights cancer is "(b)ased on the strctue<br />
of the ingredients, what we know that to be, and based on the fuction of<br />
thoseingredients, what we know that to be, and based on the experential evidence, the<br />
witness of many." (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 199-200)).<br />
21