27.12.2012 Views

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

Complaint Counsel's Post Trial Brief - Federal Trade Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

199. Respondents' substantiation for the statement that "(p lure skeletal tissue of sharks . . .<br />

can stop tuor growth" is "from the materal that ( they) had read that shark carilage<br />

provides a protein that inhbits angiogenesis and the information (they) have that (they)<br />

have. . . read and complied for many years now." (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 157)).<br />

200. Patrcia Feijo is not aware of any other studies that might have been done on Bio*Shark<br />

or shark carilage other than Dr. Lane's studies. (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 162)).<br />

201. Although Respondents relied upon Dr. Lane's book, "Sharks Don't Get Cancer," for<br />

substantiation, Respondent James Feijo never read it. (J. Feijo, Tr. 449).<br />

202. Universal Nutrtion did not conduct any testing, quality or otherise, on Bio*Shark.<br />

(R17 (Bauhoffer-Kinney, Dep. at 45-46)).<br />

7 Herb Formula<br />

203. Respondents never had an outside lab study the components of7 Herb Formula to see<br />

whether its components actually have the effect that Respondents believe it has. (R 16 (P.<br />

Feijo, Dep. at 132)).<br />

204. Rather than having an outside lab study the components of7 Herb Formula to detere<br />

whether its components were actually having the effect Respondents believe,<br />

Respondents have "experential information (and) many testimonies, many hundreds if<br />

not thousands oftestimonies." (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 132))..<br />

205. Respondents' basis for asserg that using 7 Herb Formula wil help someone with any<br />

tye of cancer is "their knowledge about the strctue/fuction of the separate ingredients<br />

and the history of the herbal formally, so experentially. . . (they) can say generally that<br />

if you suffer from any tye of cancer that (Respondents) suggest takng (7 Herb<br />

Formula)." (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 175-76)).<br />

GDU<br />

206. GDU was never subjected to clinical trals. (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 190)).<br />

207. Respondents have not done any studies to know whether GDU would counteract with any<br />

conventional cancer medicine someone was takg. (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 194)).<br />

BioMI<br />

208. Respondents did not conduct any tests or clinical studies on BioMixx. (R16 (P. Feijo,<br />

Dep. at 199)).<br />

209. Respondents did not engage anybody else to do any kind of clinical tests on BioMixx.<br />

(R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 199)).<br />

210. Respondents' basis for assering that BioMixx fights cancer is "(b)ased on the strctue<br />

of the ingredients, what we know that to be, and based on the fuction of<br />

thoseingredients, what we know that to be, and based on the experential evidence, the<br />

witness of many." (R16 (P. Feijo, Dep. at 199-200)).<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!