27.12.2012 Views

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Specific signal types in hearing research 61<br />

Figure 16. The vector representation<br />

of an N0Sπ stimulus. The<br />

masker M <strong>and</strong> signal S are added in<br />

the left ear with +90 degree phase<br />

difference, resulting in the vector<br />

L, <strong>and</strong> added in the right ear with<br />

-90 degree phase difference, resulting<br />

in the vector R. Only interaural<br />

time differences (ITDs) are<br />

present in the resulting binaural<br />

stimulus. Reused with permission<br />

from Ref. [40]. Copyright 1998,<br />

Acoustical Society of America.<br />

is interaurally out of phase, in the right panel, the phase difference between masker<br />

<strong>and</strong> signal has to be π. The addition of the masker <strong>and</strong> signal in the left <strong>and</strong> the<br />

right panels results in two vectors, L <strong>and</strong> R, which together represent the binaural<br />

stimulus. The vectors L <strong>and</strong> R have in nearly all cases the same orientation. Only<br />

when the masker envelope M is smaller than the one of the signal S, L <strong>and</strong> R point in<br />

opposite directions. Basically, for this value of the masker-signal phase, the binaural<br />

stimulus contains only IIDs which vary in time at a rate proportional to the masker<br />

b<strong>and</strong>width.<br />

In Fig. 16 a similar picture is shown as in Fig. 15, but now the masker M <strong>and</strong><br />

the signal S are added with phase differences of +90 <strong>and</strong> -90 degrees. The resulting<br />

vectors L <strong>and</strong> R have the same length in all cases, only their orientation is different.<br />

This vector diagram describes a condition with no interaural intensity differences,<br />

<strong>and</strong> only time-varying interaural time differences.<br />

These stimuli were used by van de Par <strong>and</strong> Kohlrausch [40] in a number of binaural<br />

experiments. We will here only discuss one of the measurements, which reveals nicely,<br />

how much ITDs <strong>and</strong> IIDs contribute to binaural unmasking at different frequencies.<br />

Figure 17 shows the experimental results for conditions with either only interaural<br />

intensity differences (circles) or only interaural time differences (squares). The difference<br />

between open <strong>and</strong> close symbols indicates the amount of binaural unmasking<br />

(BMLD). Two results become clear from this graph: when the binaural stimulus<br />

contains IIDs, the amount of binaural unmasking remains constant at all frequencies.<br />

When the stimulus contains interaural time differences, the binaural detection<br />

advantage is limited to low frequencies up to 1 kHz, <strong>and</strong> disappears completely at<br />

frequencies of 2 kHz <strong>and</strong> above. The details of the transition between 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 kHz<br />

seem to vary between the individual listeners. These data clearly demonstrate that<br />

BMLDs do not generally decrease at high frequencies, as is sometimes stated, but<br />

that the detection advantage is strongly linked to the cues that are available in the<br />

stimulus. This aspect will be further elaborated in the next section about transposed<br />

stimuli.<br />

These results from binaural masking experiments agree very well with observations<br />

about the detection of static IIDs <strong>and</strong> ITDs using sinusoidal signals. The sensitivity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!