27.12.2012 Views

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54 A. Kohlrausch <strong>and</strong> S. van de Par<br />

with dashed lines), however, show a clear dependence of frequency offset <strong>and</strong> thresholds<br />

are generally higher than the low-noise noise thresholds, in line with the idea<br />

that the inherent fluctuations in the Gaussian masker prohibit the detection of the<br />

modulations introduced through the addition of the sinusoidal target signal. At larger<br />

frequency offsets, however, the modulations introduced by the target signal become<br />

higher in rate, <strong>and</strong> thresholds are relatively low. Note that the frequency offsets are<br />

considerably lower than peripheral filter b<strong>and</strong>widths. Thus the patterns of thresholds<br />

observed in Fig. 10 are not likely to be influenced by peripheral filtering. For the<br />

10-Hz maskers (circles), also for the low-noise noise (solid lines) there is a dependence<br />

of frequency offset suggesting that there are inherent fluctuations in the low-noise<br />

noise masker that influence masking at small frequency offsets. Note that for small<br />

offsets the low-noise noise thresholds are considerably lower than the Gaussian noise<br />

thresholds (circles with dashed lines). Again the dependence on frequency offset that<br />

is observed here is a reflection of the processing of temporal envelope fluctuations<br />

<strong>and</strong> not of spectral resolution.<br />

3.1.4 Outlook<br />

We have seen that the use of low-noise noise as masker does lead to different thresholds<br />

compared to Gaussian noise. This supports the idea that temporal fluctuations<br />

in Gaussian noise are a significant factor in auditory masking. Thus, low-noise noise<br />

may be an interesting stimulus also in the future to study the contribution of envelope<br />

fluctuations to masking.<br />

For measurement techniques low-noise noise may also be of value because it is a<br />

signal that couples a low crest factor with a continuous spectrum. Although in hearing<br />

experiments, the b<strong>and</strong>width of low-noise noise is usually limited to at most that<br />

of one critical b<strong>and</strong>width to prevent that peripheral filtering reintroduces fluctuations<br />

in the envelope, for physical measurements this restriction may not exist <strong>and</strong><br />

wideb<strong>and</strong> low-noise noise may be used to put maximum wideb<strong>and</strong> power in a system<br />

that somehow is restricted in its maximum amplitude.<br />

3.2 Multiplied noise<br />

While the generation of low-noise noise required intensive use of digital computers,<br />

the noise described in this section, multiplied noise, made its appearance as psychoacoustic<br />

stimulus already in the analog period [37]. It was a very convenient way to<br />

generate b<strong>and</strong>pass noises with tunable center frequency (see below) <strong>and</strong> these noises<br />

were therefore quite useful in spectral masking experiments in which noise maskers<br />

with variable center frequencies <strong>and</strong> steep spectral cutoffs were required [38,39]. The<br />

reason to discuss this stimulus in the context of this chapter is, however, based on its<br />

envelope properties, which allowed to test specific ideas about monaural <strong>and</strong> binaural<br />

hearing.<br />

3.2.1 Definition<br />

Multiplied noise, sometimes also called multiplication, or regular zero-crossing noise,<br />

is generated by directly multiplying a lowpass noise having a relatively low cutoff

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!