27.12.2012 Views

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Specific signal types in hearing research 53<br />

Figure 10. Masked thresholds for Gaussian noise (dashed lines) <strong>and</strong> low-noise noise maskers<br />

(solid lines) as a function of frequency offset between the masker <strong>and</strong> target. Squares show<br />

100-Hz wide maskers <strong>and</strong> circles 10-Hz wide maskers both presented at 70 dB SPL.<br />

center frequency. For low-noise noise (circles), however, we see a clear dependence of<br />

thresholds on the center frequency. Although low-noise noise thresholds were lower<br />

than Gaussian noise thresholds already at a center frequency of 1 kHz, for 10 kHz we<br />

see a much larger difference of more than 15 dB which is much more similar to the<br />

difference observed for sinusoidal <strong>and</strong> Gaussian noise maskers. The higher thresholds<br />

for lower frequencies are well in line with the idea that peripheral filtering affects the<br />

temporal envelope flatness of low-noise noise.<br />

A variant of the experiment by Kohlrausch et al. [34] investigated the effect of a<br />

frequency offset between masker <strong>and</strong> sinusoidal target signal with the target always<br />

higher in frequency than the masker [35]. The addition of the sinusoidal target to<br />

the masker b<strong>and</strong> creates modulations with a rate that is characterized by the frequency<br />

difference between target <strong>and</strong> masker. When the target is centered within<br />

the masker, the newly introduced modulations will have a rate comparable to those<br />

already present within the masker alone <strong>and</strong> will therefore be difficult to detect.<br />

When the target is sufficiently remote from the masker b<strong>and</strong>, the modulations that<br />

will be introduced due to addition of target will be of considerably higher rate than<br />

those already present within the masker <strong>and</strong> may be much easier to detect. There<br />

is evidence that the auditory system exhibits some frequency selectivity associated<br />

with the processing of temporal envelope fluctuations, which led to the modulation<br />

filterbank model proposed by Dau et al. [36].<br />

In Fig. 10 results of the experiment by van de Par <strong>and</strong> Kohlrausch [35] are shown.<br />

Thresholds for Gaussian noise (dashed lines) <strong>and</strong> low-noise noise (solid lines) maskers<br />

are shown centered at 10 kHz, for various target-to-masker frequency offsets <strong>and</strong> two<br />

masker b<strong>and</strong>widths. As can be seen for the squares showing the 100-Hz wide maskers,<br />

the low-noise noise thresholds (squares with solid lines) are roughly independent of<br />

frequency offset. The Gaussian noise thresholds for the same b<strong>and</strong>width (squares

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!