27.12.2012 Views

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Specific signal types in hearing research 41<br />

Figure 2. Short-time spectral representation of the signals from Fig. 1 using a Hanning<br />

window with length 5 ms. The left panel shows the zero-phase signal, the middle panel the<br />

negative Schroeder phase <strong>and</strong> the right panel the positive Schroeder phase complex. Reused<br />

with permission from Ref. [9]. Copyright 1995, Acoustical Society of America.<br />

other observation: the audibility of a sinusoidal stimulus in a complex-tone masker<br />

depended strongly on the sign in the phase formula: When the background was<br />

constructed with a positive sign, the masked thresholds were lower by up to 20 dB,<br />

compared to the situation in which the phase sign was negative.<br />

This large threshold difference formed a considerable scientific puzzle: both masker<br />

versions had a similarly flat temporal envelope, so there was no reason to assume a<br />

difference in masking potential for simultaneously presented sinusoids. The effect<br />

was finally understood on the basis of computer simulations with a time-domain<br />

basilar-membrane model which had been realized by Hans-Werner Strube [14]. This<br />

model was, at that time, the first computer model with a realistic phase characteristic<br />

for the basilar membrane, which allowed to compute the basilar-membrane output<br />

in the time domain, <strong>and</strong> it was sufficiently time-efficient. Strube observed that the<br />

two versions of the Schroeder-phase complex lead to very different waveforms at the<br />

output of the filter element that represented a specific place on the basilar membrane.<br />

One waveform was clearly more modulated, <strong>and</strong> the existence of valleys in the masker<br />

waveform fitted nicely to the observation by Smith that this masker also led to lower<br />

masked thresholds: the target signal could be detected easier in these masker valleys.<br />

In the next years, a great number of further experiments <strong>and</strong> model simulations<br />

were performed [9,15,16] which led to the following insights. The clue to underst<strong>and</strong><br />

the differences between positive <strong>and</strong> negative Schroeder-phase stimuli lies in the phase<br />

characteristic of the auditory filter. If subjects have to detect a narrowb<strong>and</strong> stimulus<br />

in a broadb<strong>and</strong> masker, only the frequency region around the target frequency is<br />

of interest. In order to simulate the transformations in the auditory periphery for<br />

such an experiment, we have to compute the waveforms of the acoustic stimuli at the<br />

output of the auditory filter that is centered on the target frequency. This waveform<br />

will depend critically on the amplitude <strong>and</strong> the phase characteristic of the auditory<br />

filter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!