27.12.2012 Views

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 H. W. Strube<br />

that overlap at most half, normalized cross-correlation coefficients are then formed<br />

with shifts within ±0.3 ms. The largest of all these coefficients yields a meassure,<br />

“Glottal-to-Noise Excitation ratio” (GNE) [20].<br />

To obtain a graphical representation appropriate for clinical routine, a two-dimensional<br />

plot was desired. For this purpose we considered 6 jitter <strong>and</strong> 6 shimmer<br />

measures, the MWC, <strong>and</strong> 3 variants each of NNE, CHNR <strong>and</strong> GNE. The dependencies<br />

between these were investigated using rank correlation <strong>and</strong> mutual information. It<br />

turned out that the GNE was most independent of the irregularity measures. By<br />

means of principal-component analysis it was shown that, for pathological voices, two<br />

dimensions explain 95% of variance (for normal voices, four dimensions are required).<br />

In this way, a diagram resulted with an abscissa that was an average of a jitter<br />

measure, a shimmer measure <strong>and</strong> the MWC, <strong>and</strong> a (linearly transformed) GNE as<br />

ordinate, the “Göttinger Hoarseness Diagram” (GHD).<br />

Normal voices are located at the lower left, aphonic voices at the upper right<br />

in the diagram. Different groups (e. g., persons, vowels, medical diagnoses) can be<br />

represented by ellipses, where the principal axes indicate the st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations<br />

with respect to abscissa <strong>and</strong> ordinate. Fig. 1 shows an example for various cancer<br />

groups.<br />

As in the regions of normal <strong>and</strong> of aphonic voices two dimensions are not really<br />

sufficient, it was also tried to obtain a finer resolution using Kohonen feature maps [21]<br />

(example see Fig. 2) <strong>and</strong> discriminant analysis [22]. Also, the relevance of several<br />

breathiness measures for classifying voice pathologies was investigated [23], resulting<br />

in a dimensionality of 7 for benign disorders <strong>and</strong> 3 for cancer groups.<br />

Figure 2. Kohonen feature map, projected into the GHD plane. Note the folds (marked<br />

by ellipses) near the regions of normal <strong>and</strong> aphonic voices, indicating importance of higher<br />

dimensions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!