27.12.2012 Views

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Multistep association of cations <strong>and</strong> anions 349<br />

broadb<strong>and</strong> relaxation contributions from the different ion complex species [20]. Dielectric<br />

spectroscopy thus yields direct evidence for the existence of ion pairs with<br />

life times exceeding the reorientation times, respectively, but a deconvolution of the<br />

experimental spectra is normally only possible when reasonable assumptions on the<br />

underlying molecular processes are made.<br />

4 Electrolyte solutions of monovalent anions<br />

4.1 Evidence from the solvent contribution to the static permittivity<br />

As revealed by the dielectric spectrum of the aluminium sulfate solution displayed<br />

in Fig. 12 the solvent contribution ɛ1 to the extrapolated static permittivity may fall<br />

significantly below the solvent permittivity ɛv (0) (= ɛw (0)). The reduction in ɛ1<br />

is partly due to the dilution of the dipolar solvent by the solute. This part in the<br />

polarization deficiency can be considered by a suitable mixture relation, e.g. the<br />

Bruggeman formula [71]<br />

� �1/3 ɛv(0)<br />

= (1 − v)<br />

ɛ(0)<br />

ɛv(0) − ɛu<br />

ɛ(0) − ɛu<br />

for the resulting permittivity ɛ (0) of a solution of spherical particles with volume<br />

fraction v <strong>and</strong> frequency independent permittivity ɛu in solvent with permittivity<br />

ɛv (0). In addition, two other effects may contribute to the reduction in ɛ1. One<br />

effect is suggested by extrapolated static permittivity data as shown in Fig. 14.<br />

The dielectric spectra of the bromide salt solutions for which the ɛ (0) data are<br />

presented, within the frequency range of measurements, do not indicate contributions<br />

from ion complexes, thus ɛ1 = ɛ (0) with these systems. For the bromides of large<br />

organic cations the ɛ (0) values slightly exceed the predictions of the Bruggeman<br />

mixture relation (Eq. (16)). This tendency in the extrapolated static permittivity<br />

seems to be characteristic to aqueous solutions of organic solutes <strong>and</strong> is assumed to<br />

be due to hydrophobic interaction effects [74–76]. The ɛ (0) value of the alkali halide<br />

solutions are smaller than predicted by Eq. (16) <strong>and</strong>, furtheron, the deviation from<br />

the mixture relation increases with decreasing cation radius. This feature points at an<br />

interaction between the dipole moment of the solvent molecules <strong>and</strong> the electric field<br />

of the small cations. The preferential orientation of the dipole moments within the<br />

Coulombic fields (Fig. 15) leads to a reduced orientation polarizability of the solvent,<br />

usually named “dielectric saturation” [72,77]. We shall get back to saturation effects<br />

later.<br />

The other effect that leads to a reduction in the extrapolated static permittivity of<br />

electrolyte solutions is featured by the ɛ (0) data for solutions of lithium chloride in<br />

two different solvents, given in Fig. 16. For methanol solutions the reduction in the<br />

permittivity ratio ɛ (0) /ɛv (0) is considerably larger than for aqueous solutions. These<br />

findings reflect a feature of the kinetic polarization deficiency [80–84] resulting from<br />

a coupling of dielectric properties to the hydrodynamics of the conducting liquids.<br />

An ion moving in a liquid, that is exposed to an external electric field, sets up<br />

a nonuniform flow in its ambient solvent [85]. The dipole moments of the solvent<br />

(16)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!