27.12.2012 Views

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

296 Schreiber<br />

<strong>and</strong> the last term accounts for nonlinear contributions such as backscatter-related<br />

coupling, which are neglected in the following discussion.<br />

Usually, the gain factor G is considered constant with respect to time in ring<br />

laser theory. However, for the reasons outlined above, one has to account for the<br />

progressive compensation of gas impurity related losses by setting for example<br />

G = G0e αt . (13)<br />

This choice of G is arbitrary <strong>and</strong> motivated from the behaviour of the loss as shown<br />

in Ref. [13]. The beam output power of Eq. (12) in the required form for large ring<br />

lasers with an 1:1 isotope mixture of 20 Ne <strong>and</strong> 22 Ne becomes<br />

Po = 2IsAbT<br />

�<br />

G<br />

µ · κ1Zi(ξ1)<br />

�<br />

+ κ2Zi(ξ2)<br />

− 1<br />

Zi(0)<br />

, (14)<br />

with Is the saturation intensity, Ab the beam cross section <strong>and</strong> T the transmission<br />

of the laser mirrors. Zi is the imaginary part of the plasma dispersion function with<br />

lasing at a frequency detuning of ξn with respect to the corresponding line centers of<br />

the two Neon isotopes, each having a partial pressure of κ1 <strong>and</strong> κ2, respectively. The<br />

most important part in this equation is the factor G/µ, which represents the gain–<br />

loss ratio. This factor is approximately constant over the time of the measurements<br />

because of the feedback loop operation. Since there is no drift in the optical frequency<br />

involved, the contribution of the plasma dispersion function also remains constant.<br />

Therefore, the denominator in Eq. (12) can be approximated by 1 + xPo ∼ = 1 so that<br />

this equation reduces to<br />

∆KA<br />

=<br />

KA<br />

� �<br />

∆K<br />

− aG0e<br />

K N<br />

αt . (15)<br />

Applied to the dataset of Fig. 16 one obtains a corrected dataset as shown in Fig. 17<br />

after a nonlinear fitting procedure is performed. The result from Fig. 17 outlines the<br />

best mid-term performance obtained from UG2 so far.<br />

6.6 Ring laser orientation<br />

The Sagnac frequency in Eq. (2) contains contributions from three distinctly different<br />

mechanisms. Most obviously it relates the experienced rotation rate with the<br />

frequency difference observed between the two senses of propagation in the ring laser.<br />

Variations of the scale factor modify the proportionality between rotation rate <strong>and</strong><br />

observed Sagnac frequency. The inner product between the normal vector on the<br />

ring laser plane <strong>and</strong> the vector of rotation finally determines how much of the rotation<br />

rate is projected onto the ring laser. For a large instrument rigidly attached to<br />

the ground <strong>and</strong> monitoring the Earth rotation rate this means, that any changes in<br />

orientation between the ring laser <strong>and</strong> the instantaneous Earth rotation vector show<br />

up in the Sagnac frequency.<br />

Solid Earth tides <strong>and</strong> diurnal polar motion cause such orientation changes. A<br />

detailed description is given in Refs. [21, 22]. The direction of the Earth’s rotation axis<br />

varies with respect to both Earth- <strong>and</strong> space-fixed reference systems. The principal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!