27.12.2012 Views

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

Oscillations, Waves, and Interactions - GWDG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

p a [kPa]<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

SI<br />

BJ<br />

RD 1.0<br />

RD 0.1<br />

20 kHz<br />

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20<br />

R0 [µm]<br />

Acoustic cavitation 189<br />

p a [kPa]<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

1 MHz<br />

50<br />

0<br />

SI<br />

BJ<br />

RD 1.0<br />

RD 0.1<br />

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4<br />

R0 [µm]<br />

Figure 13. Phase diagrams for bubbles in a st<strong>and</strong>ing wave, indicating the lines of surface<br />

instability (SI) <strong>and</strong> Bjerknes force inversion (BJ). Also, the thresholds of rectified diffusion<br />

are given for water at gas saturation (RD 1.0) <strong>and</strong> degassed to 10% of saturation (RD<br />

0.1). Left: f = 20 kHz, right: f = 1 MHz (water at normal conditions, κ = 1). Points of<br />

accumulation are marked by a circle.<br />

the SI line is forbidden, as bubbles there would be splitting into smaller ones soon<br />

(<strong>and</strong> thus jump to the left). From such an analysis, one can find accumulation points<br />

in the parameter plane: bubbles tend to gather at crossings of the BJ line with a<br />

negative slope part of the SI line, as long as such a point lies above the RD line. In<br />

the examples of Fig. 13, such a point is close to 175 kPa <strong>and</strong> 5 µm at 20 kHz, <strong>and</strong><br />

175 kPa <strong>and</strong> 2 µm at 1 MHz, respectively. The conclusion is that in st<strong>and</strong>ing waves<br />

of the given frequencies “typical” or “frequently found” parameters of the bubbles<br />

are those of the accumulation points.<br />

If one considers the actual trajectories in the R0–pa plane, antinode pressure <strong>and</strong><br />

wavelength have to be fixed, <strong>and</strong> added mass <strong>and</strong> viscous drag have to be taken<br />

into account as indicated in Sect. 4.3. An example is given in Fig. 14(a) where lines<br />

are plotted that represent the way of test bubbles through that plane. The shown<br />

case is interesting, because a trajectory separation along a line, similar to a water<br />

shed, can be observed. Indeed it is this water shed line which separates growing from<br />

dissolving bubbles, <strong>and</strong> not the RD threshold: bubbles moving fast enough towards<br />

a high presure region can escape from the dissolution zone [50]. This leads to the<br />

surprising result that, for the indicated parameters <strong>and</strong> irrespective of their location,<br />

almost all bubbles of rest radius larger than about 6 µm finally do not dissolve, but<br />

grow until surface instability sets in!<br />

Now we briefly turn to plane travelling waves (compare also Ref. [50]). As the<br />

pressure amplitude does not vary in space, the life diagrams look simpler: for a<br />

given pressure value, it is sufficient to consider paths in the R0–x plane, where x is<br />

the coordinate in direction of the wave vector. Examples are shown in Fig. 14(b) for<br />

20 kHz. In the examined parameter range of small rest radii it is found that significant<br />

(macroscopic) translation appears only for growing bubbles. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, at<br />

elevated pressures the motion is rather fast, <strong>and</strong> the bubbles do not grow significantly<br />

before they covered a wavelength’s distance. At intermediate pressure values, a size

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!