quiet-the-power-of-introverts-in-a-world-that-cant-stop-talking-susan-cain
eugenics and white supremacism. Bycontrast, the notion of children as blankslates for whom anything was possibleappealed to a nation built ondemocracy.But Kagan had changed his mindalong the way. “I have been dragged,kicking and screaming, by my data,” hesays now, “to acknowledge that temperamentis more powerful than Ithought and wish to believe.” The publicationof his early findings on high-reactivechildren in Science magazine in1988 helped to legitimize the idea ofinborn temperament, partly because his“nurturist” reputation was so strong.If anyone could help me untangle thenature-nurture question, I hoped, it wasJerry Kagan.310/929
Kagan ushers me inside his office inHarvard’s William James Hall, surveyingme unblinkingly as I sit down: notunkind, but definitely discerning. I hadimagined him as a gentle, white-labcoatedscientist in a cartoon, pouringchemicals from one test tube to anotheruntil—poof! Now, Susan, you know exactlywho you are. But this isn’t themild-mannered old professor I’d imagined.Ironically for a scientist whosebooks are infused with humanism andwho describes himself as having beenan anxious, easily frightened boy, I findhim downright intimidating. I kick offour interview by asking a backgroundquestion whose premise he disagreeswith. “No, no, no!” he thunders, as if Iweren’t sitting just across from him.The high-reactive side of my personalitykicks into full gear. I’m alwayssoft-spoken, but now I have to force my311/929
- Page 259 and 260: If personal space is vital to creat
- Page 261 and 262: 261/9291. Don’t judge or criticiz
- Page 263 and 264: Manufacturing (otherwise known as3M
- Page 265 and 266: increases: groups of nine generate
- Page 267 and 268: group performed much better than it
- Page 269 and 270: participants would do better in pub
- Page 271 and 272: conform. What was going on in themi
- Page 273 and 274: decision-making. But when they went
- Page 275 and 276: that they had arrived serendipitous
- Page 277 and 278: population density is correlated wi
- Page 279 and 280: hours—not the eight, ten, or four
- Page 281 and 282: many casual, chance encounters as p
- Page 283 and 284: PartTWOYOUR BIOLOGY, YOUR SELF?
- Page 285 and 286: dries up and I can’t get any word
- Page 287 and 288: seminar for his entire executive te
- Page 289 and 290: my anxiety, but over the years I’
- Page 291 and 292: For one of those studies, launched
- Page 293 and 294: robot. At seven, they were asked to
- Page 295 and 296: be a scientist. “Like … other f
- Page 297 and 298: temperature, and other properties o
- Page 299 and 300: introverts—just the opposite—bu
- Page 301 and 302: limbs (or staying calm) in response
- Page 303 and 304: castles—he’ll often concentrate
- Page 305 and 306: thin body and narrow face. Such con
- Page 307 and 308: share only 50 percent of their gene
- Page 309: day in a foreign city, but I love t
- Page 313 and 314: family goes to the beach every week
- Page 315 and 316: high-reactive nervous system. One t
- Page 317 and 318: Kagan tells me about the time hewat
- Page 319 and 320: like asking whether a blizzard is c
- Page 321 and 322: “The university is filled with in
- Page 323 and 324: extremely low-reactive kids? Often
- Page 325 and 326: According to Jay Belsky, a leadingp
- Page 327 and 328: it’s becoming the leader of their
- Page 329 and 330: Stephen Suomi, the scientist whocon
- Page 331 and 332: focuses on problems and pathology.
- Page 333 and 334: Most people would appreciate thefle
- Page 335 and 336: Developmental Neuroimaging and Psyc
- Page 337 and 338: We gaze reverently at the fMRI scan
- Page 339 and 340: doing all these early observations
- Page 341 and 342: strangers and feel “Geez! Who are
- Page 343 and 344: We might call this the “rubber ba
- Page 345 and 346: conditioned a rat to associate a ce
- Page 347 and 348: knows it. When she arrives at a par
- Page 349 and 350: makes people describe her as a “f
- Page 351 and 352: intimate backyard talks with her mo
- Page 353 and 354: part was when she got to close the
- Page 355 and 356: To solve Esther’s problem, let’
- Page 357 and 358: they’re constricted, so the brain
- Page 359 and 360: personality psychologist David Fund
Kagan ushers me inside his office in
Harvard’s William James Hall, surveying
me unblinkingly as I sit down: not
unkind, but definitely discerning. I had
imagined him as a gentle, white-labcoated
scientist in a cartoon, pouring
chemicals from one test tube to another
until—poof! Now, Susan, you know exactly
who you are. But this isn’t the
mild-mannered old professor I’d imagined.
Ironically for a scientist whose
books are infused with humanism and
who describes himself as having been
an anxious, easily frightened boy, I find
him downright intimidating. I kick off
our interview by asking a background
question whose premise he disagrees
with. “No, no, no!” he thunders, as if I
weren’t sitting just across from him.
The high-reactive side of my personality
kicks into full gear. I’m always
soft-spoken, but now I have to force my
311/929