10.03.2023 Views

richard_dawkins_-_the_god_delusion

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE GOD HYPOTHESIS 61

non-interventionist, NOMA God, though less violent and clumsy

than an Abrahamic God, is still, when you look at him fair and

square, a scientific hypothesis. I return to the point: a universe in

which we are alone except for other slowly evolved intelligences is

a very different universe from one with an original guiding agent

whose intelligent design is responsible for its very existence. I accept

that it may not be so easy in practice to distinguish one kind of

universe from the other. Nevertheless, there is something utterly

special about the hypothesis of ultimate design, and equally special

about the only known alternative: gradual evolution in the broad

sense. They are close to being irreconcilably different. Like nothing

else, evolution really does provide an explanation for the existence

of entities whose improbability would otherwise, for practical

purposes, rule them out. And the conclusion to the argument, as I

shall show in Chapter 4, is close to being terminally fatal to the

God Hypothesis.

THE GREAT PRAYER EXPERIMENT

An amusing, if rather pathetic, case study in miracles is the Great

Prayer Experiment: does praying for patients help them recover?

Prayers are commonly offered for sick people, both privately and in

formal places of worship. Darwin's cousin Francis Galton was the

first to analyse scientifically whether praying for people is

efficacious. He noted that every Sunday, in churches throughout

Britain, entire congregations prayed publicly for the health of the

royal family. Shouldn't they, therefore, be unusually fit, compared

with the rest of us, who are prayed for only by our nearest and

dearest?* Galton looked into it, and found no statistical difference.

His intention may, in any case, have been satirical, as also when he

prayed over randomized plots of land to see if the plants would

grow any faster (they didn't).

More recently, the physicist Russell Stannard (one of Britain's

three well-known religious scientists, as we shall see) has thrown

* When my Oxford college elected the Warden whom I quoted earlier, it happened

that the Fellows publicly drank his health on three successive evenings. At the third

of these dinners, he graciously remarked in his speech of reply: 'I'm feeling better

already.'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!