richard_dawkins_-_the_god_delusion
372 THE GOD DELUSIONof simulating a three-dimensional maze of branches and trunks. Awater boatman's brain doesn't need 3D software, since it lives onthe surface of the pond in an Edwin Abbott Flatland. A mole'ssoftware for constructing models of the world will be customizedfor underground use. A naked mole rat probably has worldrepresentingsoftware similar to a mole's. But a squirrel, although itis a rodent like the mole rat, probably has world-rendering softwaremuch more like a monkey's.I've speculated, in The Blind Watchmaker and elsewhere, thatbats may 'see' colour with their ears. The world-model that a batneeds, in order to navigate through three dimensions catchinginsects, must surely be similar to the model that a swallow needs inorder to perform much the same task. The fact that the bat usesechoes to update the variables in its model, while the swallow useslight, is incidental. Bats, I suggest, use perceived hues such as 'red'and 'blue' as internal labels for some useful aspect of echoes,perhaps the acoustic texture of surfaces; just as swallows use thesame perceived hues to label long and short wavelengths of light.The point is that the nature of the model is governed by how it isto be used rather than by the sensory modality involved. The lessonof the bats is this. The general form of the mind model - as opposedto the variables that are constantly being inputted by sensory nerves- is an adaptation to the animal's way of life, no less than its wings,legs and tail are.J. B. S. Haldane, in the article on 'possible worlds' that I quotedabove, had something relevant to say about animals whose world isdominated by smell. He noted that dogs can distinguish two verysimilar volatile fatty acids - caprylic acid and caproic acid - eachdiluted to one part in a million. The only difference is that caprylicacid's main molecular chain is two carbon atoms longer than themain chain of caproic acid. A dog, Haldane guesses, would probablybe able to place the acids 'in the order of their molecularweights by their smells, just as a man could place a number of pianowires in the order of their lengths by means of their notes'.There is another fatty acid, capric acid, which is just like theother two except that it has yet two more carbon atoms in its mainchain. A dog that had never met capric acid would perhaps have nomore trouble imagining its smell than we would have trouble
A M U C H N E E D E D G A P ? 373imagining a trumpet playing one note higher than we have heard atrumpet play before. It seems to me entirely reasonable to guessthat a dog, or a rhinoceros, might treat mixtures of smells asharmonious chords. Perhaps there are discords. Probably notmelodies, for melodies are built up of notes that start or stopabruptly with accurate timing, unlike smells. Or perhaps dogs andrhinos smell in colour. The argument would be the same as for thebats.Once again, the perceptions that we call colours are tools usedby our brains to label important distinctions in the outside world.Perceived hues - what philosophers call qualia - have no intrinsicconnection with lights of particular wavelengths. They are internallabels that are available to the brain, when it constructs its modelof external reality, to make distinctions that are especially salient tothe animal concerned. In our case, or that of a bird, that meanslight of different wavelengths. In a bat's case, I have speculated, itmight be surfaces of different echoic properties or textures, perhapsred for shiny, blue for velvety, green for abrasive. And in a dog's ora rhino's case, why should it not be smells? The power to imaginethe alien world of a bat or a rhino, a pond skater or a mole, abacterium or a bark beetle, is one of the privileges science grants uswhen it tugs at the black cloth of our burka and shows us the widerrange of what is out there for our delight.The metaphor of Middle World - of the intermediate range ofphenomena that the narrow slit in our burka permits us to see -applies to yet other scales or 'spectrums'. We can construct a scaleof improbabilities, with a similarly narrow window through whichour intuition and imagination are capable of going. At one extremeof the spectrum of improbabilities are those would-be events thatwe call impossible. Miracles are events that are extremely improbable.A statue of a madonna could wave its hand at us. Theatoms that make up its crystalline structure are all vibrating backand forth. Because there are so many of them, and because there isno agreed preference in their direction of motion, the hand, as wesee it in Middle World, stays rock steady. But the jiggling atoms inthe hand could all just happen to move in the same direction at thesame time. And again. And again ... In this case the hand wouldmove, and we'd see it waving at us. It could happen, but the odds
- Page 314 and 315: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 321to
- Page 316 and 317: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND R E L
- Page 318 and 319: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 325be
- Page 320 and 321: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND R E L
- Page 322 and 323: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND RELIG
- Page 324 and 325: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND R E L
- Page 326 and 327: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 333.t
- Page 328 and 329: C H I L D H O O D , A B U S E A N D
- Page 330 and 331: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 337th
- Page 332 and 333: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 339He
- Page 334 and 335: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 341de
- Page 336 and 337: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND R E L
- Page 338 and 339: CHAPTER 10A much neededgap?What can
- Page 340 and 341: 348 THE GOD DELUSIONBinker - what I
- Page 342 and 343: 350 THE GOD DELUSIONfriends - and i
- Page 344 and 345: 352 T H E GOD DELUSIONtrying out id
- Page 346 and 347: 354 THE GOD DELUSIONconsoled by the
- Page 348 and 349: 356 T HE GOD DELUSIONdoctor's lie r
- Page 350 and 351: 358 THE GOD DELUSIONare most afraid
- Page 352 and 353: 360 THE GOD. DELUSIONevidence for t
- Page 354 and 355: 362 THE GOD DELUSIONpowerful enough
- Page 356 and 357: 364 THE GOD DELUSIONthe way matter
- Page 358 and 359: 366 THEGODDELUSIONmathematics work,
- Page 360 and 361: 368 THE GOD DELUSIONcould safely be
- Page 362 and 363: 370 T H E GOD DELUSIONand that limi
- Page 366 and 367: 374 T H E G O D DEL U S I O Nagains
- Page 368 and 369: 376 T H E G O D D E L U S I O NAfri
- Page 370 and 371: 378 THEGODDELUSIONNational Secular
- Page 372 and 373: Books cited orrecommendedAdams, D.
- Page 374 and 375: 382 THE GOD DELUSIONDennett, D. C.
- Page 376 and 377: 384 T HE GOD DELUSIO NHodder &c Sto
- Page 378 and 379: 386 THE GOD D E I, US1ONShermer, M.
- Page 380 and 381: NotesPreface1 Wendy Kaminer, 'The l
- Page 382 and 383: 390 T HE GO D D E L U S I O N34 Hen
- Page 384 and 385: 392 THE GOD DELUSION64 This account
- Page 386 and 387: 394 THE GOD DELUSIONChapter 7: The
- Page 388 and 389: 396 THE GOD DELUSIONThe dark side o
- Page 390 and 391: 398 THE GOD DELUSION146 Guardian, 1
- Page 392 and 393: IndexA for Andromeda (Hoyle), 72Aar
- Page 394 and 395: 402 T H E GOD D E L U S I O NDonne,
- Page 396 and 397: 404 T H E G O D D E L U S I O NLinc
- Page 398: 406 T HE GOD DEL U SIGN'skyhooks',
A M U C H N E E D E D G A P ? 373
imagining a trumpet playing one note higher than we have heard a
trumpet play before. It seems to me entirely reasonable to guess
that a dog, or a rhinoceros, might treat mixtures of smells as
harmonious chords. Perhaps there are discords. Probably not
melodies, for melodies are built up of notes that start or stop
abruptly with accurate timing, unlike smells. Or perhaps dogs and
rhinos smell in colour. The argument would be the same as for the
bats.
Once again, the perceptions that we call colours are tools used
by our brains to label important distinctions in the outside world.
Perceived hues - what philosophers call qualia - have no intrinsic
connection with lights of particular wavelengths. They are internal
labels that are available to the brain, when it constructs its model
of external reality, to make distinctions that are especially salient to
the animal concerned. In our case, or that of a bird, that means
light of different wavelengths. In a bat's case, I have speculated, it
might be surfaces of different echoic properties or textures, perhaps
red for shiny, blue for velvety, green for abrasive. And in a dog's or
a rhino's case, why should it not be smells? The power to imagine
the alien world of a bat or a rhino, a pond skater or a mole, a
bacterium or a bark beetle, is one of the privileges science grants us
when it tugs at the black cloth of our burka and shows us the wider
range of what is out there for our delight.
The metaphor of Middle World - of the intermediate range of
phenomena that the narrow slit in our burka permits us to see -
applies to yet other scales or 'spectrums'. We can construct a scale
of improbabilities, with a similarly narrow window through which
our intuition and imagination are capable of going. At one extreme
of the spectrum of improbabilities are those would-be events that
we call impossible. Miracles are events that are extremely improbable.
A statue of a madonna could wave its hand at us. The
atoms that make up its crystalline structure are all vibrating back
and forth. Because there are so many of them, and because there is
no agreed preference in their direction of motion, the hand, as we
see it in Middle World, stays rock steady. But the jiggling atoms in
the hand could all just happen to move in the same direction at the
same time. And again. And again ... In this case the hand would
move, and we'd see it waving at us. It could happen, but the odds