richard_dawkins_-_the_god_delusion

10.03.2023 Views

C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND RELIGION 329their own. Female circumcision is undoubtedly hideously painful, itsabotages sexual pleasure in women (indeed, this is probably itsunderlying purpose), and one half of the decent liberal mind wantsto abolish the practice. The other half, however, 'respects' ethniccultures and feels that we should not interfere if 'they' want tomutilate 'their' girls.* The point, of course, is that 'their' girls areactually the girls' own girls, and their wishes should not be ignored.Trickier to answer, what if a girl says she wants to be circumcised?But would she, with the hindsight of a fully informed adult, wishthat it had never happened? Humphrey makes the point that noadult woman who has somehow missed out on circumcision as achild volunteers for the operation later in life.After a discussion of the Amish, and their right to bring up 'theirown' children in 'their own' way, Humphrey is scathing about ourenthusiasm as a society formaintaining cultural diversity. All right, you may want tosay, so it's tough on a child of the Amish, or the Hasidim, orthe gypsies to be shaped up by their parents in the ways theyare - but at least the result is that these fascinating culturaltraditions continue. Would not our whole civilization beimpoverished if they were to go? It's a shame, maybe, whenindividuals have to be sacrificed to maintain such diversity.But there it is: it's the price we pay as a society. Except, Iwould feel bound to remind you, we do not pay it, they do.The issue came to public attention in 1972 when the US SupremeCourt ruled on a test case, Wisconsin versus Yoder, which concernedthe right of parents to withdraw their children from schoolon religious grounds. The Amish people live in closed communitiesin various parts of the United States, mostly speaking an archaicdialect of German called Pennsylvania Dutch and eschewing, tovarying extents, electricity, internal combustion engines, buttonsand other manifestations of modern life. There is, indeed, somethingattractively quaint about an island of seventeenth-century lifeas a spectacle for today's eyes. Isn't it worth preserving, for the sakeof the enrichment of human diversity? And the only way to preserve* It is a regular practice in Britain today. A senior Schools Inspector told me ofLondon girls in 2006 being sent to an 'uncle' in Bradford to be circumcised.Authorities turn a blind eye, for fear of being thought racist in 'the community'.

330 THE GOD DELUSIONit is to allow the Amish to educate their own children in their ownway, and protect them from the corrupting influence of modernity.But, we surely want to ask, shouldn't the children themselves havesome say in the matter?The Supreme Court was asked to rule in 1972, when someAmish parents in Wisconsin withdrew their children from highschool. The very idea of education beyond a certain age wascontrary to Amish religious values, and scientific educationespecially so. The State of Wisconsin took the parents to court,claiming that the children were being deprived of their right to aneducation. After passing up through the courts, the case eventuallyreached the United States Supreme Court, which handed down asplit (6:1) decision in favour of the parents. 142 The majority opinion,written by Chief Justice Warren Burger, included the following: 'Asthe record shows, compulsory school attendance to age 16 forAmish children carries with it a very real threat of undermining theAmish community and religious practice as they exist today; theymust either abandon belief and be assimilated into society at large,or be forced to migrate to some other and more tolerant region.'Justice William O. Douglas's minority opinion was that thechildren themselves should have been consulted. Did they reallywant to cut short their education? Did they, indeed, really want tostay in the Amish religion? Nicholas Humphrey would have gonefurther. Even if the children had been asked and had expressed apreference for the Amish religion, can we suppose that they wouldhave done so if they had been educated and informed about theavailable alternatives? For this to be plausible, shouldn't there beexamples of young people from the outside world voting with theirfeet and volunteering to join the Amish? Justice Douglas went furtherin a slightly different direction. He saw no particular reason togive the religious views of parents special status in deciding how farthey should be allowed to deprive their children of education. Ifreligion is grounds for exemption, might there not be secular beliefsthat also qualify?The majority of the Supreme Court drew a parallel with some ofthe positive values of monastic orders, whose presence in oursociety arguably enriches it. But, as Humphrey points out, there isa crucial difference. Monks volunteer for the monastic life of their

C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND RELIGION 329

their own. Female circumcision is undoubtedly hideously painful, it

sabotages sexual pleasure in women (indeed, this is probably its

underlying purpose), and one half of the decent liberal mind wants

to abolish the practice. The other half, however, 'respects' ethnic

cultures and feels that we should not interfere if 'they' want to

mutilate 'their' girls.* The point, of course, is that 'their' girls are

actually the girls' own girls, and their wishes should not be ignored.

Trickier to answer, what if a girl says she wants to be circumcised?

But would she, with the hindsight of a fully informed adult, wish

that it had never happened? Humphrey makes the point that no

adult woman who has somehow missed out on circumcision as a

child volunteers for the operation later in life.

After a discussion of the Amish, and their right to bring up 'their

own' children in 'their own' way, Humphrey is scathing about our

enthusiasm as a society for

maintaining cultural diversity. All right, you may want to

say, so it's tough on a child of the Amish, or the Hasidim, or

the gypsies to be shaped up by their parents in the ways they

are - but at least the result is that these fascinating cultural

traditions continue. Would not our whole civilization be

impoverished if they were to go? It's a shame, maybe, when

individuals have to be sacrificed to maintain such diversity.

But there it is: it's the price we pay as a society. Except, I

would feel bound to remind you, we do not pay it, they do.

The issue came to public attention in 1972 when the US Supreme

Court ruled on a test case, Wisconsin versus Yoder, which concerned

the right of parents to withdraw their children from school

on religious grounds. The Amish people live in closed communities

in various parts of the United States, mostly speaking an archaic

dialect of German called Pennsylvania Dutch and eschewing, to

varying extents, electricity, internal combustion engines, buttons

and other manifestations of modern life. There is, indeed, something

attractively quaint about an island of seventeenth-century life

as a spectacle for today's eyes. Isn't it worth preserving, for the sake

of the enrichment of human diversity? And the only way to preserve

* It is a regular practice in Britain today. A senior Schools Inspector told me of

London girls in 2006 being sent to an 'uncle' in Bradford to be circumcised.

Authorities turn a blind eye, for fear of being thought racist in 'the community'.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!