10.03.2023 Views

richard_dawkins_-_the_god_delusion

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

326 THE GOD DELUSION

in 1997. 141 Humphrey began his lecture by arguing that the proverb

is not always true, citing the case of Haitian Voodoo believers who

die, apparently from some psychosomatic effect of terror, within

days of having a malign 'spell' cast upon them. He then asked

whether Amnesty International, the beneficiary of the lecture series

to which he was contributing, should campaign against hurtful or

damaging speeches or publications. His answer was a resounding

no to such censorship in general: 'Freedom of speech is too precious

a freedom to be meddled with.' But he then went on to shock his

liberal self by advocating one important exception: to argue in

favour of censorship for the special case of children ...

. . . moral and religious education, and especially the

education a child receives at home, where parents are

allowed - even expected - to determine for their children

what counts as truth and falsehood, right and wrong.

Children, I'll argue, have a human right not to have their

minds crippled by exposure to other people's bad ideas -

no matter who these other people are. Parents, correspondingly,

have no God-given licence to enculturate their

children in whatever ways they personally choose: no

right to limit the horizons of their children's knowledge,

to bring them up in an atmosphere of dogma and superstition,

or to insist they follow the straight and narrow

paths of their own faith.

In short, children have a right not to have their minds

addled by nonsense, and we as a society have a duty to

protect them from it. So we should no more allow parents

to teach their children to believe, for example, in the

literal truth of the Bible or that the planets rule their lives,

than we should allow parents to knock their children's

teeth out or lock them in a dungeon.

Of course, such a strong statement needs, and received, much

qualification. Isn't it a matter of opinion what is nonsense? Hasn't

the applecart of orthodox science been upset often enough to

chasten us into caution? Scientists may think it is nonsense to teach

astrology and the literal truth of the Bible, but there are others who

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!