richard_dawkins_-_the_god_delusion

10.03.2023 Views

CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 313attitude to children is particularly revealing of the religious mind,and the evils that arise specifically because it is religious. First is theremarkable perception by the religious mind that a sprinkle ofwater and a brief verbal incantation can totally change a child's life,taking precedence over parental consent, the child's own consent,the child's own happiness and psychological well-being . . . overeverything that ordinary common sense and human feeling wouldsee as important. Cardinal Antonelli spelled it out at the time in aletter to Lionel Rothschild, Britain's first Jewish Member ofParliament, who had written to protest about Edgardo's abduction.The cardinal replied that he was powerless to intervene, and added,'Here it may be opportune to observe that, if the voice of nature ispowerful, even more powerful are the sacred duties of religion.'Yes, well, that just about says it all, doesn't it?Second is the extraordinary fact that the priests, cardinals andPope seem genuinely not to have understood what a terrible thingthey were doing to poor Edgardo Mortara. It passes all sensibleunderstanding, but they sincerely believed they were doing him agood turn by taking him away from his parents and giving him aChristian upbringing. They felt a duty of protection! A Catholicnewspaper in the United States defended the Pope's stance on theMortara case, arguing that it was unthinkable that a Christiangovernment 'could leave a Christian child to be brought up by aJew' and invoking the principle of religious liberty, 'the liberty of achild to be a Christian and not forced compulsorily to be a Jew . . .The Holy Father's protection of the child, in the face of all theferocious fanaticism of infidelity and bigotry, is the grandest moralspectacle which the world has seen for ages.' Has there ever been amore flagrant misdirection of words like 'forced', 'compulsorily','ferocious', 'fanaticism' and 'bigotry'? Yet all the indications arethat Catholic apologists, from the Pope down, sincerely believedthat what they were doing was right: absolutely right morally, andright for the welfare of the child. Such is the power of (mainstream,'moderate') religion to warp judgement and pervert ordinaryhuman decency. The newspaper Il Cattolico was frankly bewilderedat the widespread failure to see what a magnanimous favour theChurch had done Edgardo Mortara when it rescued him from hisJewish family:

314 THE GOD DELUSIONWhoever among us gives a little serious thought to thematter, compares the condition of a Jew - without a trueChurch, without a King, and without a country, dispersedand always a foreigner wherever he lives on the face of theearth, and moreover, infamous for the ugly stain withwhich the killers of Christ are marked . . . will immediatelyunderstand how great is this temporal advantagethat the Pope is obtaining for the Mortara boy.Third is the presumptuousness whereby religious people know,without evidence, that the faith of their birth is the one true faith,all others being aberrations or downright false. The abovequotations give vivid examples of this attitude on the Christianside. It would be grossly unjust to equate the two sides in this case,but this is as good a place as any to note that the Mortaras couldat a stroke have had Edgardo back, if only they had accepted thepriests' entreaties and agreed to be baptized themselves. Edgardohad been stolen in the first place because of a splash of water anda dozen meaningless words. Such is the fatuousness of thereligiously indoctrinated mind, another pair of splashes is all itwould have taken to reverse the process. To some of us, the parents'refusal indicates wanton stubbornness. To others, their principledstand elevates them into the long list of martyrs for all religionsdown the ages.'Be of good comfort Master Ridley and play the man: we shallthis day by God's grace light such a candle in England, as I trustshall never be put out.' No doubt there are causes for which to dieis noble. But how could the martyrs Ridley, Latimer and Cranmerlet themselves be burned rather than forsake their Protestant Littleendianismin favour of Catholic Big-endianism - does it reallymatter all that much from which end you open a boiled egg? Suchis the stubborn - or admirable, if that is your view - conviction ofthe religious mind, that the Mortaras could not bring themselves toseize the opportunity offered by the meaningless rite of baptism.Couldn't they cross their fingers, or whisper 'not' under their breathwhile being baptized? No, they couldn't, because they had beenbrought up in a (moderate) religion, and therefore took the wholeridiculous charade seriously. As for me, I think only of poor little

CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 313

attitude to children is particularly revealing of the religious mind,

and the evils that arise specifically because it is religious. First is the

remarkable perception by the religious mind that a sprinkle of

water and a brief verbal incantation can totally change a child's life,

taking precedence over parental consent, the child's own consent,

the child's own happiness and psychological well-being . . . over

everything that ordinary common sense and human feeling would

see as important. Cardinal Antonelli spelled it out at the time in a

letter to Lionel Rothschild, Britain's first Jewish Member of

Parliament, who had written to protest about Edgardo's abduction.

The cardinal replied that he was powerless to intervene, and added,

'Here it may be opportune to observe that, if the voice of nature is

powerful, even more powerful are the sacred duties of religion.'

Yes, well, that just about says it all, doesn't it?

Second is the extraordinary fact that the priests, cardinals and

Pope seem genuinely not to have understood what a terrible thing

they were doing to poor Edgardo Mortara. It passes all sensible

understanding, but they sincerely believed they were doing him a

good turn by taking him away from his parents and giving him a

Christian upbringing. They felt a duty of protection! A Catholic

newspaper in the United States defended the Pope's stance on the

Mortara case, arguing that it was unthinkable that a Christian

government 'could leave a Christian child to be brought up by a

Jew' and invoking the principle of religious liberty, 'the liberty of a

child to be a Christian and not forced compulsorily to be a Jew . . .

The Holy Father's protection of the child, in the face of all the

ferocious fanaticism of infidelity and bigotry, is the grandest moral

spectacle which the world has seen for ages.' Has there ever been a

more flagrant misdirection of words like 'forced', 'compulsorily',

'ferocious', 'fanaticism' and 'bigotry'? Yet all the indications are

that Catholic apologists, from the Pope down, sincerely believed

that what they were doing was right: absolutely right morally, and

right for the welfare of the child. Such is the power of (mainstream,

'moderate') religion to warp judgement and pervert ordinary

human decency. The newspaper Il Cattolico was frankly bewildered

at the widespread failure to see what a magnanimous favour the

Church had done Edgardo Mortara when it rescued him from his

Jewish family:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!