richard_dawkins_-_the_god_delusion
CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 313attitude to children is particularly revealing of the religious mind,and the evils that arise specifically because it is religious. First is theremarkable perception by the religious mind that a sprinkle ofwater and a brief verbal incantation can totally change a child's life,taking precedence over parental consent, the child's own consent,the child's own happiness and psychological well-being . . . overeverything that ordinary common sense and human feeling wouldsee as important. Cardinal Antonelli spelled it out at the time in aletter to Lionel Rothschild, Britain's first Jewish Member ofParliament, who had written to protest about Edgardo's abduction.The cardinal replied that he was powerless to intervene, and added,'Here it may be opportune to observe that, if the voice of nature ispowerful, even more powerful are the sacred duties of religion.'Yes, well, that just about says it all, doesn't it?Second is the extraordinary fact that the priests, cardinals andPope seem genuinely not to have understood what a terrible thingthey were doing to poor Edgardo Mortara. It passes all sensibleunderstanding, but they sincerely believed they were doing him agood turn by taking him away from his parents and giving him aChristian upbringing. They felt a duty of protection! A Catholicnewspaper in the United States defended the Pope's stance on theMortara case, arguing that it was unthinkable that a Christiangovernment 'could leave a Christian child to be brought up by aJew' and invoking the principle of religious liberty, 'the liberty of achild to be a Christian and not forced compulsorily to be a Jew . . .The Holy Father's protection of the child, in the face of all theferocious fanaticism of infidelity and bigotry, is the grandest moralspectacle which the world has seen for ages.' Has there ever been amore flagrant misdirection of words like 'forced', 'compulsorily','ferocious', 'fanaticism' and 'bigotry'? Yet all the indications arethat Catholic apologists, from the Pope down, sincerely believedthat what they were doing was right: absolutely right morally, andright for the welfare of the child. Such is the power of (mainstream,'moderate') religion to warp judgement and pervert ordinaryhuman decency. The newspaper Il Cattolico was frankly bewilderedat the widespread failure to see what a magnanimous favour theChurch had done Edgardo Mortara when it rescued him from hisJewish family:
314 THE GOD DELUSIONWhoever among us gives a little serious thought to thematter, compares the condition of a Jew - without a trueChurch, without a King, and without a country, dispersedand always a foreigner wherever he lives on the face of theearth, and moreover, infamous for the ugly stain withwhich the killers of Christ are marked . . . will immediatelyunderstand how great is this temporal advantagethat the Pope is obtaining for the Mortara boy.Third is the presumptuousness whereby religious people know,without evidence, that the faith of their birth is the one true faith,all others being aberrations or downright false. The abovequotations give vivid examples of this attitude on the Christianside. It would be grossly unjust to equate the two sides in this case,but this is as good a place as any to note that the Mortaras couldat a stroke have had Edgardo back, if only they had accepted thepriests' entreaties and agreed to be baptized themselves. Edgardohad been stolen in the first place because of a splash of water anda dozen meaningless words. Such is the fatuousness of thereligiously indoctrinated mind, another pair of splashes is all itwould have taken to reverse the process. To some of us, the parents'refusal indicates wanton stubbornness. To others, their principledstand elevates them into the long list of martyrs for all religionsdown the ages.'Be of good comfort Master Ridley and play the man: we shallthis day by God's grace light such a candle in England, as I trustshall never be put out.' No doubt there are causes for which to dieis noble. But how could the martyrs Ridley, Latimer and Cranmerlet themselves be burned rather than forsake their Protestant Littleendianismin favour of Catholic Big-endianism - does it reallymatter all that much from which end you open a boiled egg? Suchis the stubborn - or admirable, if that is your view - conviction ofthe religious mind, that the Mortaras could not bring themselves toseize the opportunity offered by the meaningless rite of baptism.Couldn't they cross their fingers, or whisper 'not' under their breathwhile being baptized? No, they couldn't, because they had beenbrought up in a (moderate) religion, and therefore took the wholeridiculous charade seriously. As for me, I think only of poor little
- Page 256 and 257: T H |{ • (. O O D ' B O O K A N D
- Page 258 and 259: HI-: ' G O O D ' B O O K A N D T H
- Page 260 and 261: T H I: ' G O O D ' BO O K A N D T H
- Page 262 and 263: 1 M I. • C; O () I) ' B O O K A N
- Page 264 and 265: T H E ' G () O I) ' B O O K A N D T
- Page 266 and 267: G O O I") ' B O O K A N D T 1 i I ,
- Page 268 and 269: T H E ' G O O D " B O O K A N D T H
- Page 270 and 271: T III ' (, () O D ' H O () K A X D
- Page 272 and 273: T H H ' G O () D ' B O O K A N D T
- Page 274 and 275: CHAPTER 8What's wrong withreligion?
- Page 276 and 277: 282 THE GOD DELUSIONbomb anybody, b
- Page 278 and 279: 284 THE GOD DELUSIONof the lecture,
- Page 280 and 281: 286 THE GOD DELUSIONof the church i
- Page 282 and 283: 288 T H E GOD D E L U S I O Nmentio
- Page 284 and 285: 290 THE GOD DELUSIONpeople is their
- Page 286 and 287: 292 T H E GOD D ELUSIONdoing his du
- Page 288 and 289: 294 THE GOD DELUSIONconsequentialis
- Page 290 and 291: 296 THE GOD DELUSIONliving in Brita
- Page 292 and 293: 298 THE GOD DELUSIONSecular moralis
- Page 294 and 295: 300 THE GOD DELUSIONof religious up
- Page 296 and 297: 302 THE GOD DELUSIONTaliban of Afgh
- Page 298 and 299: 304 T H E G O D D ELUSIO Nhimself.
- Page 300 and 301: 306 THE GOD DELUSIO Nbelieve what t
- Page 302 and 303: 308 T H E G O D DEL U S I O Nthat f
- Page 304 and 305: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND R E L
- Page 308 and 309: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 315Ed
- Page 310 and 311: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND R E L
- Page 312 and 313: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND R E L
- Page 314 and 315: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 321to
- Page 316 and 317: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND R E L
- Page 318 and 319: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 325be
- Page 320 and 321: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND R E L
- Page 322 and 323: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND RELIG
- Page 324 and 325: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND R E L
- Page 326 and 327: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 333.t
- Page 328 and 329: C H I L D H O O D , A B U S E A N D
- Page 330 and 331: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 337th
- Page 332 and 333: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 339He
- Page 334 and 335: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 341de
- Page 336 and 337: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND R E L
- Page 338 and 339: CHAPTER 10A much neededgap?What can
- Page 340 and 341: 348 THE GOD DELUSIONBinker - what I
- Page 342 and 343: 350 THE GOD DELUSIONfriends - and i
- Page 344 and 345: 352 T H E GOD DELUSIONtrying out id
- Page 346 and 347: 354 THE GOD DELUSIONconsoled by the
- Page 348 and 349: 356 T HE GOD DELUSIONdoctor's lie r
- Page 350 and 351: 358 THE GOD DELUSIONare most afraid
- Page 352 and 353: 360 THE GOD. DELUSIONevidence for t
- Page 354 and 355: 362 THE GOD DELUSIONpowerful enough
CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 313
attitude to children is particularly revealing of the religious mind,
and the evils that arise specifically because it is religious. First is the
remarkable perception by the religious mind that a sprinkle of
water and a brief verbal incantation can totally change a child's life,
taking precedence over parental consent, the child's own consent,
the child's own happiness and psychological well-being . . . over
everything that ordinary common sense and human feeling would
see as important. Cardinal Antonelli spelled it out at the time in a
letter to Lionel Rothschild, Britain's first Jewish Member of
Parliament, who had written to protest about Edgardo's abduction.
The cardinal replied that he was powerless to intervene, and added,
'Here it may be opportune to observe that, if the voice of nature is
powerful, even more powerful are the sacred duties of religion.'
Yes, well, that just about says it all, doesn't it?
Second is the extraordinary fact that the priests, cardinals and
Pope seem genuinely not to have understood what a terrible thing
they were doing to poor Edgardo Mortara. It passes all sensible
understanding, but they sincerely believed they were doing him a
good turn by taking him away from his parents and giving him a
Christian upbringing. They felt a duty of protection! A Catholic
newspaper in the United States defended the Pope's stance on the
Mortara case, arguing that it was unthinkable that a Christian
government 'could leave a Christian child to be brought up by a
Jew' and invoking the principle of religious liberty, 'the liberty of a
child to be a Christian and not forced compulsorily to be a Jew . . .
The Holy Father's protection of the child, in the face of all the
ferocious fanaticism of infidelity and bigotry, is the grandest moral
spectacle which the world has seen for ages.' Has there ever been a
more flagrant misdirection of words like 'forced', 'compulsorily',
'ferocious', 'fanaticism' and 'bigotry'? Yet all the indications are
that Catholic apologists, from the Pope down, sincerely believed
that what they were doing was right: absolutely right morally, and
right for the welfare of the child. Such is the power of (mainstream,
'moderate') religion to warp judgement and pervert ordinary
human decency. The newspaper Il Cattolico was frankly bewildered
at the widespread failure to see what a magnanimous favour the
Church had done Edgardo Mortara when it rescued him from his
Jewish family: