richard_dawkins_-_the_god_delusion
T H I: ' G O O D ' BO O K A N D T H E M O R A I, Z /• I f C I: 1 S T 265that we have almost all moved on, and in a big way, since biblicaltimes. Slavery, which was taken for granted in the Bible andthroughout most of history, was abolished in civilized countries inthe nineteenth century. All civilized nations now accept what waswidely denied up to the 1920s, that a woman's vote, in an electionor on a jury, is the equal of a man's. In today's enlightened societies(a category that manifestly does not include, for example, SaudiArabia), women are no longer regarded as property, as they clearlywere in biblical times. Any modern legal system would haveprosecuted Abraham for child abuse. And if he had actually carriedthrough his plan to sacrifice Isaac, we would have convicted him offirst-degree murder. Yet, according to the mores of his time, hisconduct was entirely admirable, obeying God's commandment.Religious or not, we have all changed massively in our attitude towhat is right and what is wrong. What is the nature of this change,and what drives it?In any society there exists a somewhat mysterious consensus,which changes over the decades, and for which it is not pretentiousto use the German loan-word Zeitgeist (spirit of the times). I saidthat female suffrage was now universal in the world's democracies,but this reform is in fact astonishingly recent. Here are some datesat which women were granted the vote:New ZealandAustraliaFinlandNorwayUnited StatesBritainFranceBelgiumSwitzerlandKuwait1893190219061913192019281945194619712006This spread of dates through the twentieth century is a gauge ofthe shifting Zeitgeist. Another is our attitude to race. In the earlypart of the twentieth century, almost everybody in Britain (andmany other countries too) would be judged racist by today's
266 T H 1- (• O V> I) F I. U s I O Nstandards. Most white people believed that black people (in whichcategory they would have lumped the very diverse Africans withunrelated groups from India, Australia and Melanesia) were inferiorto white people in almost all respects except - patronizingly - senseof rhythm. The 1920s equivalent of James Bond was that cheerfullydebonair boyhood hero, Bulldog Drummond. In one novel, TheBlack Gang, Drummond refers to 'Jews, foreigners, and otherunwashed folk'. In the climax scene of The Female of the Species,Drummond is cleverly disguised as Pedro, black servant of the archvillain.For his dramatic disclosure, to the reader as well as tothe villain, that 'Pedro' is really Drummond himself, he could havesaid: 'You think I am Pedro. Little do you realize, I am your archenemyDrummond, blacked up.' Instead, he chose these words:'Every beard is not false, but every nigger smells. That beard ain'tfalse, dearie, and dis nigger don't smell. So I'm thinking, there'ssomething wrong somewhere.' I read it in the 1950s, three decadesafter it was written, and it was (just) still possible for a boy to thrillto the drama and not notice the racism. Nowadays, it would beinconceivable.Thomas Henry Huxley, by the standards of his times, was anenlightened and liberal progressive. But his times were not ours,and in 1871 he wrote the following:No rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that theaverage negro is the equal, still less the superior, ofthe white man. And if this be true, it is simply incrediblethat, when all his disabilities are removed, and ourprognathous relative has a fair field and no favor, as wellas no oppressor, he will be able to compete successfullywith his bigger-brained and smaller-jawed rival, in acontest which is to be carried on by thoughts and not bybites. The highest places in the hierarchy of civilizationwill assuredly not be within the reach of our duskycousins. 104It is a commonplace that good historians don't judge statementsfrom past times by the standards of their own. Abraham Lincoln,like Huxley, was ahead of his time, yet his views on matters of race
- Page 210 and 211: T H E R O O T S OF M O R A L ! T Y
- Page 212 and 213: T H H R O O T S O F M O R A L I T Y
- Page 214 and 215: T H K R O O "I S O ! ; M O R A M T
- Page 216 and 217: T H F , R O O T S O F M O R A L I T
- Page 218 and 219: \ I i') K A I I M : \V 1 ! \ A i d
- Page 220 and 221: R (> O I S (i I Y1 O l< A I I I "I
- Page 222 and 223: R O t ' i l s O F M d l t A I I'I'V
- Page 224 and 225: K O O I S O! M O R A I . I H : «
- Page 226 and 227: K O O I S O I V! (> R A 1 1 T Y : W
- Page 228 and 229: 1K O O I \ < ) i VI O K A I . i l >
- Page 230 and 231: HO I s o r M (.> R A ! I ! Y : \\ I
- Page 232 and 233: O O K \ \ i> 'Mil Xi I'H ,\ j / J.
- Page 234 and 235: T H E ' G O O D ' B O O K A N D T H
- Page 236 and 237: H E ' G O O D " B O O K A N D T H E
- Page 238 and 239: THE ' G O O D ' B O O K AND T H E M
- Page 240 and 241: T H E ' G O O D ' B O () K A N D T
- Page 242 and 243: T H E ' G O I H ) ' B O O K AN l> T
- Page 244 and 245: T H E ' G O O D ' BO O K A N D T H
- Page 246 and 247: ' ! I K ' G O O 1) ' B O O K A N I"
- Page 248 and 249: T H E - G O O D ' B O O K A N D T H
- Page 250 and 251: T H i : ' G O O IV Si O O K A N D T
- Page 252 and 253: TII 1- ' G O O D ' B O O K A N D T
- Page 254 and 255: F i l l • ( . O O D ' B O O K A N
- Page 256 and 257: T H |{ • (. O O D ' B O O K A N D
- Page 258 and 259: HI-: ' G O O D ' B O O K A N D T H
- Page 262 and 263: 1 M I. • C; O () I) ' B O O K A N
- Page 264 and 265: T H E ' G () O I) ' B O O K A N D T
- Page 266 and 267: G O O I") ' B O O K A N D T 1 i I ,
- Page 268 and 269: T H E ' G O O D " B O O K A N D T H
- Page 270 and 271: T III ' (, () O D ' H O () K A X D
- Page 272 and 273: T H H ' G O () D ' B O O K A N D T
- Page 274 and 275: CHAPTER 8What's wrong withreligion?
- Page 276 and 277: 282 THE GOD DELUSIONbomb anybody, b
- Page 278 and 279: 284 THE GOD DELUSIONof the lecture,
- Page 280 and 281: 286 THE GOD DELUSIONof the church i
- Page 282 and 283: 288 T H E GOD D E L U S I O Nmentio
- Page 284 and 285: 290 THE GOD DELUSIONpeople is their
- Page 286 and 287: 292 T H E GOD D ELUSIONdoing his du
- Page 288 and 289: 294 THE GOD DELUSIONconsequentialis
- Page 290 and 291: 296 THE GOD DELUSIONliving in Brita
- Page 292 and 293: 298 THE GOD DELUSIONSecular moralis
- Page 294 and 295: 300 THE GOD DELUSIONof religious up
- Page 296 and 297: 302 THE GOD DELUSIONTaliban of Afgh
- Page 298 and 299: 304 T H E G O D D ELUSIO Nhimself.
- Page 300 and 301: 306 THE GOD DELUSIO Nbelieve what t
- Page 302 and 303: 308 T H E G O D DEL U S I O Nthat f
- Page 304 and 305: C H I L D H O O D , ABUSE AND R E L
- Page 306 and 307: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 313at
- Page 308 and 309: CHILDHOOD, ABUSE AND RELIGION 315Ed
T H I: ' G O O D ' BO O K A N D T H E M O R A I, Z /• I f C I: 1 S T 265
that we have almost all moved on, and in a big way, since biblical
times. Slavery, which was taken for granted in the Bible and
throughout most of history, was abolished in civilized countries in
the nineteenth century. All civilized nations now accept what was
widely denied up to the 1920s, that a woman's vote, in an election
or on a jury, is the equal of a man's. In today's enlightened societies
(a category that manifestly does not include, for example, Saudi
Arabia), women are no longer regarded as property, as they clearly
were in biblical times. Any modern legal system would have
prosecuted Abraham for child abuse. And if he had actually carried
through his plan to sacrifice Isaac, we would have convicted him of
first-degree murder. Yet, according to the mores of his time, his
conduct was entirely admirable, obeying God's commandment.
Religious or not, we have all changed massively in our attitude to
what is right and what is wrong. What is the nature of this change,
and what drives it?
In any society there exists a somewhat mysterious consensus,
which changes over the decades, and for which it is not pretentious
to use the German loan-word Zeitgeist (spirit of the times). I said
that female suffrage was now universal in the world's democracies,
but this reform is in fact astonishingly recent. Here are some dates
at which women were granted the vote:
New Zealand
Australia
Finland
Norway
United States
Britain
France
Belgium
Switzerland
Kuwait
1893
1902
1906
1913
1920
1928
1945
1946
1971
2006
This spread of dates through the twentieth century is a gauge of
the shifting Zeitgeist. Another is our attitude to race. In the early
part of the twentieth century, almost everybody in Britain (and
many other countries too) would be judged racist by today's