richard_dawkins_-_the_god_delusion
K O O I S O I V! (> R A 1 1 T Y : W H V A R 1 W 1'. (, O (> 1) ? 229we need religion when what they really mean is we need police.'Obviously, not everybody in Montreal behaved badly as soon asthe police were off the scene. It would be interesting to knowwhether there was any statistical tendency, however slight, forreligious believers to loot and destroy less than unbelievers. Myuninformed prediction would have been opposite. It is oftencynically said that there are no atheists in foxholes. I'm inclined tosuspect (with some evidence, although it may be simplistic to drawconclusions from it) that there are very few atheists in prisons. I amnot necessarily claiming that atheism increases morality, althoughhumanism - the ethical system that often goes with atheism -probably does. Another good possibility is that atheism iscorrelated with some third factor, such as higher education,intelligence or reflectiveness, which might counteract criminalimpulses. Such research evidence as there is certainly doesn'tsupport the common view that religiosity is positively correlatedwith morality. Correlational evidence is never conclusive, but thefollowing data, described by Sam Harris in his Letter to a ChristianNation, are nevertheless striking.While political party affiliation in the United States is nota perfect indicator of religiosity, it is no secret that the 'red[Republican| states' are primarily red due to the overwhelmingpolitical influence of conservative Christians. Ifthere were a strong correlation between Christian conservatismand societal health, we might expect to see somesign of it in red-state America. We don't. Of the twentyfivecities with the lowest rates of violent crime, 62percent are in 'blue' [Democrat] states, and 38 percent arein 'red' [Republican] states. Of the twenty-five most dangerouscities, 76 percent are in red states, and 24 percentare in blue states. In fact, three of the five most dangerouscities in the U.S. are in the pious state of Texas. The twelvestates with the highest rates of burglary are red. Twentyfourof the twenty-nine states with the highest rates oftheft are red. Of the twenty-two states with the highestrates of murder, seventeen are red.** Note that these colour conventions in America are exactly the opposite of thosein Britain, where blue is the colour of the Conservative Party, and red, as in therest of the world, is the colour traditionally associated with the political left.
230 Mil- (.OP I") r I. I; '•> I O NSystematic research if anything tends to support such correlationaldata. Dan Dennett, in Breaking the Spell, sardonically comments,not on Harris's book in particular, but on such studies generally:Needless to say, these results strike so hard at the standardclaims of greater moral virtue among the religious thatthere has been a considerable surge of further researchinitiated by religious organizations attempting to refutethem . . . one thing we can be sure of is that if there is asignificant positive relationship between moral behaviourand religious affiliation, practice, or belief, it will soon bediscovered, since so many religious organizations areeager to confirm their traditional beliefs about thisscientifically. (They are quite impressed with the truthfindingpower of science when it supports what theyalready believe.) Every month that passes without such ademonstration underlines the suspicion that it just isn't so.Most thoughtful people would agree that morality in theabsence of policing is somehow more truly moral than the kind offalse morality that vanishes as soon as the police go on strike or thespy camera is switched off, whether the spy camera is a real onemonitored in the police station or an imaginary one in heaven. Butit is perhaps unfair to interpret the question 'If there is no God,why bother to be good?' in such a cynical way.* A religious thinkercould offer a more genuinely moral interpretation, along the linesof the following statement from an imaginary apologist. 'If youdon't believe in God, you don't believe there are any absolutestandards of morality. With the best will in the world you mayintend to be a good person, but how do you decide what is goodand what is bad? Only religion can ultimately provide yourstandards of good and evil. Without religion you have to make itup as you go along. That would be morality without a rule book:morality flying by the seat of its pants. If morality is merely amatter of choice, Hitler could claim to be moral by his owneugenically inspired standards, and all the atheist can do is make apersonal choice to live by different lights. The Christian, the Jew or* H. L. Mencken, again with characteristic cynicism, defined conscience as theinner voice that warns us that someone may be looking.
- Page 176 and 177: T H E R O O T S OF R I: I. I (i I O
- Page 178 and 179: T 11 E R O O T S O F R K L 1 (. 1 O
- Page 180 and 181: THE ROOTS OF RELIGION 181psychologi
- Page 182 and 183: THE R O O T S O F R E L I G I O N 1
- Page 184 and 185: THE R O O T S O F RELIGI O N 185boo
- Page 186 and 187: T H E ROOTS OF RELIGION 187Breakfas
- Page 188 and 189: T H E R O O T S O F R E L I G 1 0 N
- Page 190 and 191: T H E R O O T S O F R E L \ G I O N
- Page 192 and 193: T H E ROOTS OF RELIGION 193the prob
- Page 194 and 195: T H E R O O T S O F R E L I G I O N
- Page 196 and 197: T H E R O O T S OF RELIGION 197'mem
- Page 198 and 199: T HE ROOTS OF RELIGION 199ambiguity
- Page 200 and 201: T H E R O O T S OF R E L I G I O N
- Page 202 and 203: T H E ROOTS OF RELI G I O N 203They
- Page 204 and 205: T HE R O O T S O F R E L J G 1 O N
- Page 206 and 207: T H E R O O T S O F R E L 1 G I O N
- Page 208 and 209: THE R O O T S OF M O R A L I T Y :
- Page 210 and 211: T H E R O O T S OF M O R A L ! T Y
- Page 212 and 213: T H H R O O T S O F M O R A L I T Y
- Page 214 and 215: T H K R O O "I S O ! ; M O R A M T
- Page 216 and 217: T H F , R O O T S O F M O R A L I T
- Page 218 and 219: \ I i') K A I I M : \V 1 ! \ A i d
- Page 220 and 221: R (> O I S (i I Y1 O l< A I I I "I
- Page 222 and 223: R O t ' i l s O F M d l t A I I'I'V
- Page 224 and 225: K O O I S O! M O R A I . I H : «
- Page 228 and 229: 1K O O I \ < ) i VI O K A I . i l >
- Page 230 and 231: HO I s o r M (.> R A ! I ! Y : \\ I
- Page 232 and 233: O O K \ \ i> 'Mil Xi I'H ,\ j / J.
- Page 234 and 235: T H E ' G O O D ' B O O K A N D T H
- Page 236 and 237: H E ' G O O D " B O O K A N D T H E
- Page 238 and 239: THE ' G O O D ' B O O K AND T H E M
- Page 240 and 241: T H E ' G O O D ' B O () K A N D T
- Page 242 and 243: T H E ' G O I H ) ' B O O K AN l> T
- Page 244 and 245: T H E ' G O O D ' BO O K A N D T H
- Page 246 and 247: ' ! I K ' G O O 1) ' B O O K A N I"
- Page 248 and 249: T H E - G O O D ' B O O K A N D T H
- Page 250 and 251: T H i : ' G O O IV Si O O K A N D T
- Page 252 and 253: TII 1- ' G O O D ' B O O K A N D T
- Page 254 and 255: F i l l • ( . O O D ' B O O K A N
- Page 256 and 257: T H |{ • (. O O D ' B O O K A N D
- Page 258 and 259: HI-: ' G O O D ' B O O K A N D T H
- Page 260 and 261: T H I: ' G O O D ' BO O K A N D T H
- Page 262 and 263: 1 M I. • C; O () I) ' B O O K A N
- Page 264 and 265: T H E ' G () O I) ' B O O K A N D T
- Page 266 and 267: G O O I") ' B O O K A N D T 1 i I ,
- Page 268 and 269: T H E ' G O O D " B O O K A N D T H
- Page 270 and 271: T III ' (, () O D ' H O () K A X D
- Page 272 and 273: T H H ' G O () D ' B O O K A N D T
- Page 274 and 275: CHAPTER 8What's wrong withreligion?
K O O I S O I V! (> R A 1 1 T Y : W H V A R 1 W 1'. (, O (> 1) ? 229
we need religion when what they really mean is we need police.'
Obviously, not everybody in Montreal behaved badly as soon as
the police were off the scene. It would be interesting to know
whether there was any statistical tendency, however slight, for
religious believers to loot and destroy less than unbelievers. My
uninformed prediction would have been opposite. It is often
cynically said that there are no atheists in foxholes. I'm inclined to
suspect (with some evidence, although it may be simplistic to draw
conclusions from it) that there are very few atheists in prisons. I am
not necessarily claiming that atheism increases morality, although
humanism - the ethical system that often goes with atheism -
probably does. Another good possibility is that atheism is
correlated with some third factor, such as higher education,
intelligence or reflectiveness, which might counteract criminal
impulses. Such research evidence as there is certainly doesn't
support the common view that religiosity is positively correlated
with morality. Correlational evidence is never conclusive, but the
following data, described by Sam Harris in his Letter to a Christian
Nation, are nevertheless striking.
While political party affiliation in the United States is not
a perfect indicator of religiosity, it is no secret that the 'red
[Republican| states' are primarily red due to the overwhelming
political influence of conservative Christians. If
there were a strong correlation between Christian conservatism
and societal health, we might expect to see some
sign of it in red-state America. We don't. Of the twentyfive
cities with the lowest rates of violent crime, 62
percent are in 'blue' [Democrat] states, and 38 percent are
in 'red' [Republican] states. Of the twenty-five most dangerous
cities, 76 percent are in red states, and 24 percent
are in blue states. In fact, three of the five most dangerous
cities in the U.S. are in the pious state of Texas. The twelve
states with the highest rates of burglary are red. Twentyfour
of the twenty-nine states with the highest rates of
theft are red. Of the twenty-two states with the highest
rates of murder, seventeen are red.*
* Note that these colour conventions in America are exactly the opposite of those
in Britain, where blue is the colour of the Conservative Party, and red, as in the
rest of the world, is the colour traditionally associated with the political left.