richard_dawkins_-_the_god_delusion

10.03.2023 Views

K O O I S O I V! (> R A 1 1 T Y : W H V A R 1 W 1'. (, O (> 1) ? 229we need religion when what they really mean is we need police.'Obviously, not everybody in Montreal behaved badly as soon asthe police were off the scene. It would be interesting to knowwhether there was any statistical tendency, however slight, forreligious believers to loot and destroy less than unbelievers. Myuninformed prediction would have been opposite. It is oftencynically said that there are no atheists in foxholes. I'm inclined tosuspect (with some evidence, although it may be simplistic to drawconclusions from it) that there are very few atheists in prisons. I amnot necessarily claiming that atheism increases morality, althoughhumanism - the ethical system that often goes with atheism -probably does. Another good possibility is that atheism iscorrelated with some third factor, such as higher education,intelligence or reflectiveness, which might counteract criminalimpulses. Such research evidence as there is certainly doesn'tsupport the common view that religiosity is positively correlatedwith morality. Correlational evidence is never conclusive, but thefollowing data, described by Sam Harris in his Letter to a ChristianNation, are nevertheless striking.While political party affiliation in the United States is nota perfect indicator of religiosity, it is no secret that the 'red[Republican| states' are primarily red due to the overwhelmingpolitical influence of conservative Christians. Ifthere were a strong correlation between Christian conservatismand societal health, we might expect to see somesign of it in red-state America. We don't. Of the twentyfivecities with the lowest rates of violent crime, 62percent are in 'blue' [Democrat] states, and 38 percent arein 'red' [Republican] states. Of the twenty-five most dangerouscities, 76 percent are in red states, and 24 percentare in blue states. In fact, three of the five most dangerouscities in the U.S. are in the pious state of Texas. The twelvestates with the highest rates of burglary are red. Twentyfourof the twenty-nine states with the highest rates oftheft are red. Of the twenty-two states with the highestrates of murder, seventeen are red.** Note that these colour conventions in America are exactly the opposite of thosein Britain, where blue is the colour of the Conservative Party, and red, as in therest of the world, is the colour traditionally associated with the political left.

230 Mil- (.OP I") r I. I; '•> I O NSystematic research if anything tends to support such correlationaldata. Dan Dennett, in Breaking the Spell, sardonically comments,not on Harris's book in particular, but on such studies generally:Needless to say, these results strike so hard at the standardclaims of greater moral virtue among the religious thatthere has been a considerable surge of further researchinitiated by religious organizations attempting to refutethem . . . one thing we can be sure of is that if there is asignificant positive relationship between moral behaviourand religious affiliation, practice, or belief, it will soon bediscovered, since so many religious organizations areeager to confirm their traditional beliefs about thisscientifically. (They are quite impressed with the truthfindingpower of science when it supports what theyalready believe.) Every month that passes without such ademonstration underlines the suspicion that it just isn't so.Most thoughtful people would agree that morality in theabsence of policing is somehow more truly moral than the kind offalse morality that vanishes as soon as the police go on strike or thespy camera is switched off, whether the spy camera is a real onemonitored in the police station or an imaginary one in heaven. Butit is perhaps unfair to interpret the question 'If there is no God,why bother to be good?' in such a cynical way.* A religious thinkercould offer a more genuinely moral interpretation, along the linesof the following statement from an imaginary apologist. 'If youdon't believe in God, you don't believe there are any absolutestandards of morality. With the best will in the world you mayintend to be a good person, but how do you decide what is goodand what is bad? Only religion can ultimately provide yourstandards of good and evil. Without religion you have to make itup as you go along. That would be morality without a rule book:morality flying by the seat of its pants. If morality is merely amatter of choice, Hitler could claim to be moral by his owneugenically inspired standards, and all the atheist can do is make apersonal choice to live by different lights. The Christian, the Jew or* H. L. Mencken, again with characteristic cynicism, defined conscience as theinner voice that warns us that someone may be looking.

K O O I S O I V! (> R A 1 1 T Y : W H V A R 1 W 1'. (, O (> 1) ? 229

we need religion when what they really mean is we need police.'

Obviously, not everybody in Montreal behaved badly as soon as

the police were off the scene. It would be interesting to know

whether there was any statistical tendency, however slight, for

religious believers to loot and destroy less than unbelievers. My

uninformed prediction would have been opposite. It is often

cynically said that there are no atheists in foxholes. I'm inclined to

suspect (with some evidence, although it may be simplistic to draw

conclusions from it) that there are very few atheists in prisons. I am

not necessarily claiming that atheism increases morality, although

humanism - the ethical system that often goes with atheism -

probably does. Another good possibility is that atheism is

correlated with some third factor, such as higher education,

intelligence or reflectiveness, which might counteract criminal

impulses. Such research evidence as there is certainly doesn't

support the common view that religiosity is positively correlated

with morality. Correlational evidence is never conclusive, but the

following data, described by Sam Harris in his Letter to a Christian

Nation, are nevertheless striking.

While political party affiliation in the United States is not

a perfect indicator of religiosity, it is no secret that the 'red

[Republican| states' are primarily red due to the overwhelming

political influence of conservative Christians. If

there were a strong correlation between Christian conservatism

and societal health, we might expect to see some

sign of it in red-state America. We don't. Of the twentyfive

cities with the lowest rates of violent crime, 62

percent are in 'blue' [Democrat] states, and 38 percent are

in 'red' [Republican] states. Of the twenty-five most dangerous

cities, 76 percent are in red states, and 24 percent

are in blue states. In fact, three of the five most dangerous

cities in the U.S. are in the pious state of Texas. The twelve

states with the highest rates of burglary are red. Twentyfour

of the twenty-nine states with the highest rates of

theft are red. Of the twenty-two states with the highest

rates of murder, seventeen are red.*

* Note that these colour conventions in America are exactly the opposite of those

in Britain, where blue is the colour of the Conservative Party, and red, as in the

rest of the world, is the colour traditionally associated with the political left.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!