10.03.2023 Views

richard_dawkins_-_the_god_delusion

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

140 T H V. C, O L) I) I- i U S I O N

over the planet, on all continents and islands, and at all times. We

can safely predict that, if we wait another ten million years, a whole

new set of species will be as well adapted to their ways of life as

today's species are to theirs. This is a recurrent, predictable,

multiple phenomenon, not a piece of statistical luck recognized

with hindsight. And, thanks to Darwin, we know how it is brought

about: by natural selection.

The anthropic principle is impotent to explain the multifarious

details of living creatures. We really need Darwin's powerful crane

to account for the diversity of life on Earth, and especially the

persuasive illusion of design. The origin of life, by contrast, lies outside

the reach of that crane, because natural selection cannot

proceed without it. Here the anthropic principle comes into its

own. We can deal with the unique origin of life by postulating a

very large number of planetary opportunities. Once that initial

stroke of luck has been granted - and the anthropic principle most

decisively grants it to us - natural selection takes over: and natural

selection is emphatically not a matter of luck.

Nevertheless, it may be that the origin of life is not the only

major gap in the evolutionary story that is bridged by sheer luck,

anthropically justified. For example, my colleague Mark Ridley in

Mendel's Demon (gratuitously and confusingly retitled The

Cooperative Gene by his American publishers) has suggested that

the origin of the eucaryotic cell (our kind of cell, with a nucleus and

various other complicated features such as mitochondria, which are

not present in bacteria) was an even more momentous, difficult and

statistically improbable step than the origin of life. The origin of

consciousness might be another major gap whose bridging was

of the same order of improbability. One-off events like this might

be explained by the anthropic principle, along the following lines.

There are billions of planets that have developed life at the level of

bacteria, but only a fraction of these life forms ever made it across

the gap to something like the eucaryotic cell. And of these, a yet

smaller fraction managed to cross the later Rubicon to consciousness.

If both of these are one-off events, we are not dealing with a ubiquitous

and all-pervading process, as we are with ordinary, run-of-themill

biological adaptation. The anthropic principle states that,

since we are alive, eucaryotic and conscious, our planet has to be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!