10.03.2023 Views

richard_dawkins_-_the_god_delusion

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

W H Y '11IKRK A L M O S T (.: F R T A 1 N [. Y 15 NO (, O I) 125

irreducible complexity, the smooth gradient of Mount Improbable.

The creationists are right that, if genuinely irreducible complexity

could be properly demonstrated, it would wreck Darwin's theory.

Darwin himself said as much: 'If it could be demonstrated that any

complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed

by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would

absolutely break down. But I can find no such case.' Darwin could

find no such case, and nor has anybody since Darwin's time, despite

strenuous, indeed desperate, efforts. Many candidates for this holy

grail of creationism have been proposed. None has stood up to

analysis.

In any case, even though genuinely irreducible complexity would

wreck Darwin's theory if it were ever found, who is to say that it

wouldn't wreck the intelligent design theory as well? Indeed, it

already has wrecked the intelligent design theory, for, as I keep saying

and will say again, however little we know about God, the one

thing we can be sure of is that he would have to be very very

complex and presumably irreducibly so!

THE WORSHIP OF GAPS

Searching for particular examples of irreducible complexity is a

fundamentally unscientific way to proceed: a special case of arguing

from present ignorance. It appeals to the same faulty logic as 'the

God of the Gaps' strategy condemned by the theologian Dietrich

Bonhoeffer. Creationists eagerly seek a gap in present-day

knowledge or understanding. If an apparent gap is found, it is

assumed that God, by default, must fill it. What worries thoughtful

theologians such as Bonhoeffer is that gaps shrink as science

advances, and God is threatened with eventually having nothing to

do and nowhere to hide. What worries scientists is something else.

It is an essential part of the scientific enterprise to admit ignorance,

even to exult in ignorance as a challenge to future conquests. As my

friend Matt Ridley has written, 'Most scientists are bored by what

they have already discovered. It is ignorance that drives them on.'

Mystics exult in mystery and want it to stay mysterious. Scientists

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!