Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT

Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT

26.12.2012 Views

Thruster-seconds are something of a placeholder variable against which to plot this thrust loss; there are no thruster-second terms in the thrust equations (4-1), (4-3), (4-5) or (4-7). At first, it was thought that the observed thrust loss might be a temperature effect; the temperature of the nitrogen in the CGSE was known to decrease as the flight tanks were drained, since condensation and frost were observed to form on the outside of various CGSE pipes and fittings (although no direct measurements of nitrogen temperature were taken), and equation (4-8) does show that

One solution to this problem would have been to run a very extensive test battery so that a large number of data points could be grouped in different ways to isolate particular effects. For example, the type of test for which results were plotted in Figure 6-8 could be performed for each of the 31 thruster combinations of interest, to obtain initial thrust levels and individualized profiles of thrust decrease with gas usage for each combination. However, this would have been very resource-intensive in a number of ways. Each characterization test involved a range of tasks including preparing the TALARIS vehicle, filling the flight tanks, and making safety checks before thruster firing and data collection could occur; the process took two to four people at least one to two hours to complete. Then, the data had to be analyzed, which took additional people and time. The cost of propellant was also a concern. The nitrogen used in the CGSE was ordered in cylinders pressurized to 6000 psig at 70°F [58]; in terms of moles of gas, each cylinder held slightly more nitrogen than necessary to fill the flight tanks three times. However, a cylinder could only be used for filling if its pressure was higher than that of the flight tanks, and as the pressure of a cylinder was depleted it became more and more difficult to use the gas inside it. In order to mitigate this issue, several nitrogen cylinders were kept on hand and used for staged filling; the cylinder at lowest pressure would be used to fill the flight tanks as full as possible, after which the cylinder at next lowest pressure would be used to increase the flight tank pressure further, and so on until the fullest cylinder simply topped the flight tanks off. This practice enabled more efficient use of the nitrogen, but it also increased the amount of time needed for fill operations, and it was still never possible to use all of the nitrogen in a cylinder. With all these considerations, it was simply not practical to run 31 separate tests; even 8 to 10 tests required several weeks of work, which was a considerable amount of time given the accelerated schedule of the TALARIS project. Thus, each of the 31 combinations was fired at least once, but only a few representative selections of the combinations were repeated in a different order over several tests to try to identify the envelope within which the CGSE thrust levels varied. Maximum thrust levels Data from single-thruster firings at the very beginning of test sequences was used to determine the maximum thrust of each CGSE thruster, as presented in the following Table 6-1. 95

Thruster-seconds are something <strong>of</strong> a placeholder variable against which to plot this thrust loss; <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

no thruster-second terms in <strong>the</strong> thrust equations (4-1), (4-3), (4-5) or (4-7). At first, it was thought that<br />

<strong>the</strong> observed thrust loss might be a temperature effect; <strong>the</strong> temperature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nitrogen in <strong>the</strong> CGSE<br />

was known to decrease as <strong>the</strong> flight tanks were drained, since condensation and frost were observed to<br />

<strong>for</strong>m on <strong>the</strong> outside <strong>of</strong> various CGSE pipes and fittings (although no direct measurements <strong>of</strong> nitrogen<br />

temperature were taken), and equation (4-8) does show that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!