Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT
Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT Development of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the ... - SSL - MIT
6.3.3 Thrust Output Characterization To make measurements of static thrust production, thrusters were fired for at least 1 s, with at least 2 s of space between successive firings. This allowed time for transient effects to damp out. The following thruster combinations were fired: • Each individual thruster • Each pair of vertical thrusters • Each station pair • Each set of three vertical thrusters • All four vertical thrusters together • All four vertical thrusters plus each individual horizontal thruster • All four vertical thrusters plus a pair of horizontal thrusters firing to provide translational force (e.g. thrusters 2 and 8) • All four vertical thrusters plus a pair of horizontal thrusters firing to provide a torque to roll the vehicle about its X axis (e.g. thrusters 2 and 6) This set of combinations (31 in total) was chosen for several reasons. First, the single thruster firings allowed for the easiest comparison to the results of the single-stream tests. Second, the wide range of combinations tested allowed for some characterization of the effects on an individual thruster’s performance depending on how many other thrusters fired with it. This was useful in planning future changes to the CGSE; for instance, it gave some sense of how performance might change if horizontal thrusters were added in the Y direction. Finally, the combinations most likely to be used in flight were tested. During a hop, the four vertical thrusters would essentially be firing constantly (though not at 100% duty cycle); the horizontal thrusters would only fire some of the time, and then most likely in pairs to translate or rotate the vehicle, although under certain conditions a single horizontal thruster might be fired to make a small attitude correction. All of these situations were included in the static testing plan. As testing of the various planned combinations began, it became clear that one effect that had not been fully considered was the state of gas in the CGSE when a given thruster was fired. The starting pressure of the flight tanks did not seem to matter, as long as it was high enough for the regulator to maintain a given chamber pressure; if thruster 1 was the first thruster fired in a test, it produced approximately the same thrust level whether the tanks started at 4500 psia or 1500 psia. However, as a given test progressed and gas was depleted from the flight tanks, thruster output decreased even if no other 92
variables (such as number of thrusters firing) were changed. This effect is illustrated in Figure 6-8, for both a single horizontal thruster and the set of all four vertical thrusters. Figure 6-8. CGSE thrust decrease with gas usage. In the tests from which this data was collected, the flight tanks were filled to approximately 4500 psia, and the thruster(s) were fired for 1 s pulses at 2 s intervals until the pressure across the flight regulator equalized at the output set pressure of approximately 600 psia. On the y axis, thrust is normalized against the thrust measured for the first firing in a given test. On the x axis, gas usage is tracked with the unit of thruster-seconds. One thruster firing for one second consumes one thruster-second of gas, one thruster firing for two seconds and two thrusters firing for one second both consume two thruster- seconds of gas, etc. Figure 6-8 shows that there is a general decrease in thrust level as gas is consumed from the tanks. This decrease appears to be more severe at an earlier stage for the four thrusters firing together; the single thruster firing alone maintained a higher percentage of its initial thrust for a longer period, although it did drop off sharply at the end of the test. 93
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 3-1. Scaling of TALARIS terr
- Page 45 and 46: (3) Providing attitude control Ther
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 3-2 also shows the body coor
- Page 49 and 50: 4 Modeling and Flow Control Compone
- Page 51 and 52: 4.1.2 Rocket Propulsion Equations L
- Page 53 and 54: variables in equation (4-8) deal wi
- Page 55 and 56: equations. Equation (4-10) was then
- Page 57 and 58: that of helium (0.227 MPa = 32.9 ps
- Page 59 and 60: thruster solenoid valve, and chambe
- Page 61 and 62: where
- Page 63 and 64: discussed later in section 6.3.4, t
- Page 65 and 66: The flight profile begins with maxi
- Page 67 and 68: hop, any given valve or regulator o
- Page 69 and 70: esponse time was an important perfo
- Page 71 and 72: directly opens and closes the main
- Page 73 and 74: If 1D isentropic flow is assumed, t
- Page 75 and 76: 5 Single-Stream Component Testing A
- Page 77 and 78: the solenoid valve, and a pressure
- Page 79 and 80: As indicated in Figure 5-3, initial
- Page 81 and 82: Figure 5-5. CGSE high side as const
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 5-7 illustrates several aspe
- Page 85 and 86: 6 Full Eight-Thruster Flight System
- Page 87 and 88: Figure 6-2. TALARIS CGSE assembled
- Page 89 and 90: stream tests revealed that changes
- Page 91 and 92: Figure 6-5. Original CGSE control c
- Page 93: other constraints. This was difficu
- Page 97 and 98: One solution to this problem would
- Page 99 and 100: One of the characterization tests w
- Page 101 and 102: or more thrusters were firing toget
- Page 103 and 104: Table 6-3. Valve timing metrics dur
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 6-11. Redesigned CGSE contro
- Page 107 and 108: The imaginary simplified thruster c
- Page 109 and 110: traverse phase of a hop and involve
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 7-3. GNC data from 3-DOF tes
- Page 113 and 114: Tests on this vertical stand demons
- Page 115 and 116: control the belay line can be put u
- Page 117 and 118: accounting for changes in thrust le
- Page 119 and 120: development under the supervision o
- Page 121 and 122: documenting progress takes time whi
- Page 123 and 124: were encountered, it was harder to
- Page 125 and 126: [10] Bryant, K. M., Knight, C. J.,
- Page 127 and 128: [31] Canadian Centre for Occupation
6.3.3 Thrust Output Characterization<br />
To make measurements <strong>of</strong> static thrust production, thrusters were fired <strong>for</strong> at least 1 s, with at least 2 s<br />
<strong>of</strong> space between successive firings. This allowed time <strong>for</strong> transient effects to damp out. The following<br />
thruster combinations were fired:<br />
• Each individual thruster<br />
• Each pair <strong>of</strong> vertical thrusters<br />
• Each station pair<br />
• Each set <strong>of</strong> three vertical thrusters<br />
• All four vertical thrusters toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />
• All four vertical thrusters plus each individual horizontal thruster<br />
• All four vertical thrusters plus a pair <strong>of</strong> horizontal thrusters firing to provide translational <strong>for</strong>ce<br />
(e.g. thrusters 2 and 8)<br />
• All four vertical thrusters plus a pair <strong>of</strong> horizontal thrusters firing to provide a torque to roll <strong>the</strong><br />
vehicle about its X axis (e.g. thrusters 2 and 6)<br />
This set <strong>of</strong> combinations (31 in total) was chosen <strong>for</strong> several reasons. First, <strong>the</strong> single thruster firings<br />
allowed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> easiest comparison to <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> single-stream tests. Second, <strong>the</strong> wide range <strong>of</strong><br />
combinations tested allowed <strong>for</strong> some characterization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects on an individual thruster’s<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance depending on how many o<strong>the</strong>r thrusters fired with it. This was useful in planning future<br />
changes to <strong>the</strong> CGSE; <strong>for</strong> instance, it gave some sense <strong>of</strong> how per<strong>for</strong>mance might change if horizontal<br />
thrusters were added in <strong>the</strong> Y direction. Finally, <strong>the</strong> combinations most likely to be used in flight were<br />
tested. During a hop, <strong>the</strong> four vertical thrusters would essentially be firing constantly (though not at<br />
100% duty cycle); <strong>the</strong> horizontal thrusters would only fire some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> time, and <strong>the</strong>n most likely in pairs<br />
to translate or rotate <strong>the</strong> vehicle, although under certain conditions a single horizontal thruster might be<br />
fired to make a small attitude correction. All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se situations were included in <strong>the</strong> static testing plan.<br />
As testing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> various planned combinations began, it became clear that one effect that had not been<br />
fully considered was <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> gas in <strong>the</strong> CGSE when a given thruster was fired. The starting pressure<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flight tanks did not seem to matter, as long as it was high enough <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> regulator to maintain a<br />
given chamber pressure; if thruster 1 was <strong>the</strong> first thruster fired in a test, it produced approximately <strong>the</strong><br />
same thrust level whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> tanks started at 4500 psia or 1500 psia. However, as a given test<br />
progressed and gas was depleted from <strong>the</strong> flight tanks, thruster output decreased even if no o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
92